Does Johnny Mac get fired if we get embarrassed by the Rags tommorrow?
#1
Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:32 PM

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
#2
Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:35 PM
--John Buccigross
#3
Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:37 PM
Nah I think eight games is too soon to fire a coach.
It's how they're losing that makes the difference. We're starting to be one of those teams that others look forward to playing, and not because it's a challenge.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
#4
Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:37 PM
I voted no, because I doubt the gets the axe so quickly (and he shouldn't). It's still a bit early, although he should definitely feel Lou's breath on his neck and if things don't improve very quickly, there will be changes. With a team stocked like this and in a "win now" mode, I don't think it was a smart idea to hire a rookie coach.
Edited by Revan, 23 October 2010 - 07:38 PM.
#5
Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:39 PM
Is this poll about us thinking LOU will fire JMac if we lose badly to the Rangers or about US wanting Lou to fire JMac?
I voted no, because I doubt the gets the axe so quickly (and he shouldn't). It's still a bit early, although he should definitely feel Lou's breath on his neck and if things don't improve very quickly, there will be changes. With a team stocked like this and in a "win now" mode, I don't think it was a smart idea to hire a rookie coach.
I think it's because he's a rookie coach that he won't get any slack for this awful a start, especially given money spent this offseason.

I collect spores, molds and fungus.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power. Good. Thank you, thank you. If you vote me, I'm hot. What? Taxes, they'll be lower... son. The Democratic vote is the right thing to do Philadelphia, so do.
How do you spot risk? How do you avoid risk? And what makes it so risky?
#6
Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:40 PM

Devils Fan since 1989
~~~
Season Ticket Holder since '08 - '09
Section 226 - Row 2 - Seats 15 and 16
~~~
#7
Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:42 PM
#8
Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:45 PM
#9
Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:48 PM
No. Start firing the veteran players that have gone through 20 coaches in the last few years.
Amen to that, Langs is first on my list.
#10
Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:48 PM
LETS GO DEVILS
- Jim Leyland"Take all that clubhouse [expletive] and all that, throw it out the window. Every writer in the country has been writing about that [expletive] for years. Chemistry don't mean [expletive]."
#11
Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:48 PM
#12
Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:50 PM
He's coaching a team that's half rookies and half bad contracts.
No.
#13
Posted 23 October 2010 - 08:01 PM
Fired for what?
He's coaching a team that's half rookies and half bad contracts.
No.
Stop...he's got a roster that should be top in the conference. Hopefully either mac is gone ina a week or a major shakeup happens. For all the bs that lou spits year after year about nothing mattering other than a cup...well his team is certainly showing its worth.
#14
Posted 23 October 2010 - 08:07 PM
#15
Posted 23 October 2010 - 08:08 PM
The question is, should he be fired and that's debatable.
Co-
of Ilya Kovalchuk
Proud to be King of the Kovalnuts (Est. June 2010 by MantaRay)
#16
Posted 23 October 2010 - 08:28 PM
Stop...he's got a roster that should be top in the conference. Hopefully either mac is gone ina a week or a major shakeup happens. For all the bs that lou spits year after year about nothing mattering other than a cup...well his team is certainly showing its worth.
No doubt Jmac takes some blame. He has some talent for sure. But no Volchenkov, no Salvador and no cap room means some blueliners that should be in the minors. And Elias, Rolston, Zubrus(although I like his style of play) and others have been playing below there cap hit before Maclean showed up...
Hopefully they can pull out of it but maybe a shekeup is needed.
#17
Posted 23 October 2010 - 08:33 PM
Elias and Rolston are now playing above their cap hit?No doubt Jmac takes some blame. He has some talent for sure. But no Volchenkov, no Salvador and no cap room means some blueliners that should be in the minors. And Elias, Rolston, Zubrus(although I like his style of play) and others have been playing below there cap hit before Maclean showed up...
Hopefully they can pull out of it but maybe a shekeup is needed.
Short of blind passes to no one or a falling Clarkson Elias has been invisible....
Rolston is tougher to tell as he's hurt.

Sole Keeper of Anton Volchenkov
Sole Keeper of Mike Mottau #27
Keeper of Bryce Salvador #24
#18
Posted 23 October 2010 - 08:36 PM
This, X 100. I've had it with these a$$hole vets doing nothing but collect paychecks. I'm looking at you Langenbrunner.No. Start firing the veteran players that have gone through 20 coaches in the last few years.

#19
Posted 23 October 2010 - 08:38 PM

Co-
of Ilya Kovalchuk
Proud to be King of the Kovalnuts (Est. June 2010 by MantaRay)
#20
Posted 23 October 2010 - 08:38 PM
Elias and Rolston are now playing above their cap hit?
Short of blind passes to no one or a falling Clarkson Elias has been invisible....
Rolston is tougher to tell as he's hurt.
No they are still playing below it. They are playing terrible. I'm just saying you can't blame Maclean for those guys sucking, because they haven't been right for a while.
Yes unfair to blame Rolston. He actually looked like he was coming around before the injury.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














