Even bad teams are pretty much guaranteed to find a way to win 20 games over the course of a full season...why not this game?
And for love of God, score more than one friggin' goal! PLEASE?!
So much for that...
Posted 30 December 2010 - 07:07 AM
Even bad teams are pretty much guaranteed to find a way to win 20 games over the course of a full season...why not this game?
And for love of God, score more than one friggin' goal! PLEASE?!
Posted 30 December 2010 - 07:10 AM
The Devils already look 200% better organized. This goes to show how bad of a coach MacLean indeed was or how much better a HOF coach can make a team. They may not be scoring but we are outplaying the opposition.
Posted 30 December 2010 - 07:28 AM
Posted 30 December 2010 - 07:46 AM
Yes, now that JMac is finally gone the team looks better.
Now Brodeur appears to be our biggest weakness, because of the lack of offensive scoring. And the back of his neck must be sun-burned from that goal light going off so much lately.
2010 was an ugly year to be a Devils fan. Hoping 2011 starts off with some goals & ultimately some wins.
Posted 30 December 2010 - 07:47 AM

Posted 30 December 2010 - 08:01 AM
So much? - 2 goals last night.
Posted 30 December 2010 - 08:19 AM
looking at the Devils stats it's amazing that Clarkson has no PP points this season. He's been on the PP all year and hasn't even been able to accident his way into a point

Posted 30 December 2010 - 08:22 AM
Posted 30 December 2010 - 08:34 AM
Edited by Colorado Rockies 1976, 30 December 2010 - 08:35 AM.
Posted 30 December 2010 - 08:40 AM
Send Marty to Albany for conditioning and bring up Frazee to alternate with Hedberg and allow Frazee to get some NHL experience. Marty has been killing the momentum by allowing soft goals like the first GA.
Posted 30 December 2010 - 09:02 AM
We did not lose that game last night because of the weak goal allowed. We lost it because Queen Henrik has our number and we struggle to score as it is. If Hedberg was in there last night he would have given up 3 or 4 easily....
Posted 30 December 2010 - 09:18 AM

Posted 30 December 2010 - 09:20 AM
Why do you continue to stick your head in the sand and not see that Marty is costing us games now. That goal totally took the momentum away and every game now for the past year I have been expecting him to let in at least one soft goal. That is unacceptable. When he was younger I would expect a weak goal once every few games, but not every friggin game.
Yes we continue to score, but that makes every goal of ours count even more. When we take the lead, that is an instant confidence booster for this fragile group and to let a softie in less than a minute later is unacceptable and changed the momentum. Yeah we outshot them, but that was the case in the 90's when we would outshoot the other team, get only 1 or 2 goals, and then win the game. With Marty's play now, we cannot even do that. Marty needs to retire soon before he really taints his career.
Edited by Colorado Rockies 1976, 30 December 2010 - 09:21 AM.
Posted 30 December 2010 - 09:29 AM
Do you realize that this team team has scored 1 goal or less in 22 games (Two of them were 2-1 SO wins where the Devils were awarded a phantom goal for winning)? They're averaging 1.72 GPG...take out the phantom goals and it drops to 1.67. This is comically, laughably, insanely bad. Marty hasn't been good this year, no disputing that, but NO GOALIE ANYWHERE (even Marty playing at the top of his game) is going to be able to do much with a team that's this offensively impotent. I'd say there's plenty of other candidates costing the Devils games.
Posted 30 December 2010 - 09:41 AM
The Devils have scored only one goal in:
- the last six games.
- nine of the last 12 games.


Posted 30 December 2010 - 09:56 AM
The Devils were not known as an offensive powerhouse in the 90's to say the least, but they stayed competative. This was because of both Brodeur and to a bigger extent the defense. Hell in 94 our leading socrer was Stevens, so that says a lot about our offense during that time. Now that we have pretty much no defense, Brodeur's weaknesses are showing. He is in fact old and slow, and should retire gracefully instead of subjecting himself to Marty chants from opposing fans and letting in softies. I should not go to games now and expect our goalie (even those not named Marty) to let in at least 1 soft goal a game.

Posted 30 December 2010 - 09:57 AM
mills is terrible too. mills, sestito, and gionta do not belong in the nhl, period.
Posted 30 December 2010 - 09:59 AM
The Devils were not known as an offensive powerhouse in the 90's to say the least, but they stayed competative. This was because of both Brodeur and to a bigger extent the defense. Hell in 94 our leading socrer was Stevens, so that says a lot about our offense during that time. Now that we have pretty much no defense, Brodeur's weaknesses are showing. He is in fact old and slow, and should retire gracefully instead of subjecting himself to Marty chants from opposing fans and letting in softies. I should not go to games now and expect our goalie (even those not named Marty) to let in at least 1 soft goal a game.
Posted 30 December 2010 - 10:20 AM
Posted 30 December 2010 - 10:38 AM
Devils are 1-11 in december.
of each of Toronto's 6 shots on goal in Game 6
Deviling the Details - A feeble attempt at being a hockey writer.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users