Jump to content

Photo

The Devils Minority partners are looking to sell their share.


  • Please log in to reply
226 replies to this topic

#201 titans04

titans04

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,455 posts

Posted 02 February 2011 - 04:46 PM

Why? This is likely the minority owner wanting out after experiencing almost a 100% appreciation in his team equity. It's not likely a new owner will be calling shots in the future, so VBK will keep running the team and he seems willing to spend.



Don't you have to take into consideration the 250M in debt as well when looking at the overall financial picture?
  • 0

#202 Devils731

Devils731

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,471 posts

Posted 02 February 2011 - 05:05 PM

Don't you have to take into consideration the 250M in debt as well when looking at the overall financial picture?


That isn't changing, new partner or old partner, so no, it's pretty meaningless when it comes to change due to a new partner.
  • 0
Your unconditional rejection of violence makes you smugly think of yourselves as noble, as enlightened, but in reality it is nothing less than abject moral capitulation to evil. Unconditional rejection of self-defense, because you think its a supposed surrender to violence, leaves you no resort but begging for mercy or offering appeasement.

-Terry Goodkind


Sex Panther cologne -- 50 percent of the time, it works every time.

-Anchorman

The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.

-Anonymous

Keeper of Section 212-213's wayward step

#203 titans04

titans04

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,455 posts

Posted 02 February 2011 - 08:05 PM

That isn't changing, new partner or old partner, so no, it's pretty meaningless when it comes to change due to a new partner.



So that little debt is a non-factor to potential new partners, I highly doubt it. Most people are focused on the value of the club increasing from 128 to something like 220 which is great until you look at the debt vs value. I don't see how the debt doesn't factor into the overall picture.

Pretty cool though if 250M is meaningless. I think you'd be hard pressed to find a single interested investor that wouldn't take that debt into consideration. Owning sports franchises these days is risky business to begin with. Time will tell.
  • 0

#204 Devils731

Devils731

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,471 posts

Posted 02 February 2011 - 08:07 PM

1) I was talking about the day to day running of the company doesn't change because of new partner or older partner, the debt is the same.

2) The Forbes valuation included the debt, so that is factored into their estimated worth of the team. How leveraged a new partner would feel comfortable being is up to them, but doesn't affect how the Devils organization is run, since VBK calls the shots.
  • 0
Your unconditional rejection of violence makes you smugly think of yourselves as noble, as enlightened, but in reality it is nothing less than abject moral capitulation to evil. Unconditional rejection of self-defense, because you think its a supposed surrender to violence, leaves you no resort but begging for mercy or offering appeasement.

-Terry Goodkind


Sex Panther cologne -- 50 percent of the time, it works every time.

-Anchorman

The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.

-Anonymous

Keeper of Section 212-213's wayward step

#205 maxpower

maxpower

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,427 posts

Posted 02 February 2011 - 08:14 PM

Montreal was debt-ridden when they were sold as well. is there a true estimation of their debt level? Forbes is merely assumptions.
  • 0

#206 95Crash

95Crash

    General Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,950 posts

Posted 02 February 2011 - 08:44 PM

Didn't Corzine lead a group that wanted to buy the Nets a few years ago before that team was sold to Ratner? Maybe VBK is friends with him and can convince him to gather up some interested investors. ... Just throwing that out there.
  • 0



#207 titans04

titans04

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,455 posts

Posted 02 February 2011 - 09:08 PM

1) I was talking about the day to day running of the company doesn't change because of new partner or older partner, the debt is the same.

2) The Forbes valuation included the debt, so that is factored into their estimated worth of the team. How leveraged a new partner would feel comfortable being is up to them, but doesn't affect how the Devils organization is run, since VBK calls the shots.



I hear what you're saying. However I'm going by what TG wrote and long story short I believe the jist of what he said was when people are talking about the value of the team jumping from 125 to 218 they've leaving out the 250M in debt. Guess I could be wrong.
  • 0

#208 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,511 posts

Posted 02 February 2011 - 10:06 PM

I hear what you're saying. However I'm going by what TG wrote and long story short I believe the jist of what he said was when people are talking about the value of the team jumping from 125 to 218 they've leaving out the 250M in debt. Guess I could be wrong.


I'm sorry but read back what you wrote here and try to make any sense of it. The Devils now own their own arena and their value not factoring in debt is only going to jump 70 million? Especially considering that franchise values have been continually rising.

Edited by Triumph, 02 February 2011 - 10:07 PM.

  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#209 titans04

titans04

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,455 posts

Posted 02 February 2011 - 10:52 PM

http://blogs.northje..._entire_te/P50/
  • 0

#210 titans04

titans04

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,455 posts

Posted 02 February 2011 - 10:59 PM

Apparently according to Forbes they value isn't always increasing in this case according to Forbes it went down slightly this year.
  • 0

#211 Devils731

Devils731

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,471 posts

Posted 02 February 2011 - 11:47 PM

If the debt wasn't included in the value then the franchise would have increased by at least $250 million. Nobody borrows 250 mil to finance a project that's only worth 100 mil. You do borrow 250 mil to add 350 in asset value to net an additional 100 mil in value. To just use round numbers.
  • 0
Your unconditional rejection of violence makes you smugly think of yourselves as noble, as enlightened, but in reality it is nothing less than abject moral capitulation to evil. Unconditional rejection of self-defense, because you think its a supposed surrender to violence, leaves you no resort but begging for mercy or offering appeasement.

-Terry Goodkind


Sex Panther cologne -- 50 percent of the time, it works every time.

-Anchorman

The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.

-Anonymous

Keeper of Section 212-213's wayward step

#212 Triumph

Triumph

    A Legend

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,511 posts

Posted 03 February 2011 - 12:49 AM

If the debt wasn't included in the value then the franchise would have increased by at least $250 million. Nobody borrows 250 mil to finance a project that's only worth 100 mil. You do borrow 250 mil to add 350 in asset value to net an additional 100 mil in value. To just use round numbers.


you're not factoring in empty seats though.
  • 0

http://drivingplay.blogspot.com - The blog with three first lines
 


#213 newarkdev01

newarkdev01

    Senior Devil

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 895 posts

Posted 03 February 2011 - 10:12 AM

When you get down to it, the minority partner wants out of the arrangement and has to find a buyer for his stake or the whole stake. Gilfillan can push, shove and drag this out in court if he wishes but given the structure of the franchise's in the NHL I can see that backfiring against him. I would keep in mind while this all goes on that any sale must get approved by the NHL and they have in the past blocked moves. I have no idea of JVB's relationship with the league but I have to imagine it's better than that of Gilfillan.

Edited by newarkdev01, 03 February 2011 - 10:14 AM.

  • 0

#214 overtime98

overtime98

    General Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,139 posts

Posted 03 February 2011 - 10:18 AM

Its no secret Devils are losing money..... Ive seen food concessions close this season and not re open. and what happened to the Devils alley pub? lack of interest and sales, that's what. Being in last place and a bad winter has hurt the Devils this season!
  • 0
New Jersey Devils 3 time Stanley Cup Champions 1995 - 2000 - 2003!

Posted Image

#215 NJDevs4978

NJDevs4978

    A Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,053 posts

Posted 03 February 2011 - 12:19 PM

Its no secret Devils are losing money..... Ive seen food concessions close this season and not re open. and what happened to the Devils alley pub? lack of interest and sales, that's what. Being in last place and a bad winter has hurt the Devils this season!


That plus it's so well-hidden I doubt most people even realize we have an Alley Pub :P There's like one or two signs for it, and one's far away from it plus both blend in too well with the wall so they're not that noticeable.
  • 0
"The Devils have high standards, that's the difference. We have a standard to live up to every year, and a couple of teams in our area don't have the standards we do." - Pat Burns

The New Jersey Devils win Stanley Cups everywhere:
-NHL record for most road wins in the playoffs - 10-1 in '95 and 10-2 in '00
-NHL record for most home wins in the playoffs - 12-1 in '03

#216 maxpower

maxpower

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,427 posts

Posted 03 February 2011 - 03:08 PM

Its no secret Devils are losing money..... Ive seen food concessions close this season and not re open. and what happened to the Devils alley pub? lack of interest and sales, that's what. Being in last place and a bad winter has hurt the Devils this season!


they don't run the food concessions. Centerplate does. and Centerplate has been hurting for years
  • 0

#217 DaneykoIsGod

DaneykoIsGod

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,187 posts

Posted 03 February 2011 - 03:52 PM

For any of the knuckleheads still fearing the team might move:

One of the questions that I have received most often since the news broke two days ago that at least part of the Devils is up for sale concerned whether there is any way this could result in the team leaving New Jersey.

The answer to that is no.

Although Brick City Hockey LLC, which is headed by Ray Chambers and his son-in-law, Mike Gilfillan is looking to sell its share of the team, any sale of that share of the team would be packaged with team’s arena rights.

On Jan. 25, a letter was sent out by Moag and Co., a Baltimore-based investment bank, on behalf of Brick City to prospective buyers.

The first sentence of the letter read: “This firm has been engaged by the New Jersey Devils of the National Hockey League to act as a financial adviser with respect to the current capitalization of the Devils and the Prudential Center.”

In essence, whoever buys Brick City’s share of the team would also be buying its share of Devils Arena Entertainment.

If that wasn’t enough, the Devils are in the third year of a 30-year lease at Prudential Center. So, clearly, they are not leaving New Jersey.

A league official told me that there is no concern at all in the league offices about the future of the Devils in New Jersey.


Another interesting note:

Contrary to other reports, Devils president and general manager Lou Lamoriello does not own any share of the team. Lamoriello did own part of the team when John McMullen was the majority owner, but has not since the team was sold to YankeeNets/Puck Holdings in 2000.


http://blogs.northje...ing_new_jersey/
  • 0
Posted Image

"I don't like those Rangers fans from New Jersey." - Jim Dowd

#218 sundstrom

sundstrom

    Hall of Famer

  • Mod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,250 posts

Posted 03 February 2011 - 05:20 PM

re: lou's ownership.

it might not be in lou's name, but lou has stock in SOMETHING that owns part of the devils. I'm sorry that i don't know the specifics. I just know that he has a piece of the devils - probably as a partner in some other entity. that way he can say "i don't own part of the devils. - oh but i am a partner in a group that does."
  • 0

"This team was never the same once we lost Patrik Sundstrom"- Lou Lamoriello


20082719943.png
_________________________________________________________________
“They’re the ones that makes it happen,” Lemaire said. “It’s not us. It’s not me. It’s not the other guy. It’s not the guy before. It’s not the guy after. It’s them. And they have to take care of business.”
-
"I guess I just miss my friend" (#28)


#219 95Crash

95Crash

    General Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,950 posts

Posted 03 February 2011 - 06:19 PM

If the entire club was sold at once, Chambers and Gilfillan would have an easier time getting a good price for their shares. But Vanderbeek said he wanted to keep his stake in Devils Arena Entertainment, which owns the team and operates the arena.

So a showdown is under way, with two board members who don’t own stakes in the club — Patrick Hobbs, the dean of Seton Hall’s law school, and Arthur Ryan, the former chief executive of Prudential Financial — trying to broker a solution, according to a person with knowledge of the partnership.

This could include Vanderbeek’s buying out Chambers and Gilfillan, or another investor taking their shares. The price is the key. According to Forbes, the Devils were worth $218 million last year, down 2 percent from 2009. The team had debt equal to 115 percent of its value.


NY Times: Sell or Build? Devils Owners Clash Over How to Proceed
  • 0



#220 titans04

titans04

    All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,455 posts

Posted 04 February 2011 - 03:30 PM

If the debt wasn't included in the value then the franchise would have increased by at least $250 million. Nobody borrows 250 mil to finance a project that's only worth 100 mil. You do borrow 250 mil to add 350 in asset value to net an additional 100 mil in value. To just use round numbers.



I bet your wrong here because aren't you saying the value of the team is the 218M + 250M (to offset the debt) in other words the overall value is 468M, I highly doubt that.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users