It's a fact, sorry to break it to you. I remember you calling players or prospects (you've never seen live) playing overseas awful cause they had a bad shooting % which was the only info you had on them.
You're as robotic as an human being can get, that's no news to anyone here.
You have as good a memory as you are a reader or a thinker. Does this make any sense? Could you think about this for a single second and think 'Hey, does this make sense?' It just shows you don't even know what you don't know - you haven't paid attention to a lot of what I've written.
ATL: he wasn't calling me a pessimist, he's saying I judge players without context. The enormous irony of course is that A: I do consider context and that B: it's a lot easier to be skeptical of my method than it is to come up with a counter method. First it's 'Corsi doesn't matter' now it's 'you have no context'.