Jump to content

Beezer34

Member Since 09 Nov 2007
Offline Last Active Jul 10 2014 08:40 AM
****-

#1102077 Hedberg or Brodeur

Posted by Beezer34 on 25 March 2012 - 11:33 PM

yeah because marty lost them that game. zubie fvck off


Stop bro. Stop making it seem like it's 1 isolated game, as opposed to a mediocre season sandwiched around an 8 game surge after the All-Star break. Brodeur loses Tuesday he'll have as many losses on the year as wins. (26)

..this thread is completely fair by Guadana, and a very good argument to debate heading into the post-season. I don't find anything wrong with Devil fans having more confidence in Hedberg, based on the body of work he's displayed here over the past 2 seasons. (despite not being HOF bound)

EDIT: Didn't mean any disrespect Beetle.. I'm just tired of hearing Marty getting glorified throughout this season, putting up pedestrian type numbers. Playing .500 hockey for the year, with a GAA that's 2½ doesn't justify post-season play at the age of 40. (even if you're a legend)
  • 1


#1101700 Hedberg or Brodeur

Posted by Beezer34 on 24 March 2012 - 12:10 PM

They tied the game in regulation. The OT was tie. The Shoot Out started with Kovy scoring first. You know the results Toronto 3 shots 3 goals vs Devils 3 shots 2 goals. Is it Elias to be blamed for the missing a point for missing a goal?


..maybe our offense is to be blamed for not scoring 4 or 5 during the game. Or perhaps the defense should've help allow less than 18 shots. :rolleyes: Comical how everyone and everything gets the finger point, aside from Marty. *Newsflash; You're not any less a fan to acknowledge when your goalie had a bad game.. especially when he acquiesces the fact. "That was a tough game for me. It’s my job to try to get a big save somehow and try to win. We should've won that game."
Fact is Marty's won 4 out of his last 13. He absolutely needs to pick up his play, if we're to sustain any type of long run into the playoffs.

I understand the love our fanbase as for Brodeur. All-time great.. the franchise.. I get it. But he's got 26 wins in 53 played. Back on topic of this thread.. if Brodeur struggles at all come April, Hedberg will see playoff time.

..you could tell his was pissed at himself.


..and I admire that about him. It goes to show you that despite being 40, and having won everything possible there is to win, he still cares.
  • 2


#1096909 Do you think there is any truth that

Posted by Beezer34 on 05 March 2012 - 06:09 PM

I hate to throw gas on what I would have originally guessed is a made-up fire, but the numbers seem to back it up.


You have to look at the goal scoring stats in losses.. as that's where the grievance of this thread lies. Who cares if we win a 2-1 game, so long as we win. ;)
I think people seem to have a short-term memory when it comes to Brodeur's stats this season, based on the last 2 games where we got shutout and Marty only allowed 1 goal.
Marty's got 22 wins, and 20 losses this season. His GAA in losses is 3.34

..I know the MB30 ra-ra unit has been screaming foul since the Ranger\Islander games, that we left Marty out to dry (and they're 100% right to complain about those games) but I feel there's a bit too much focus on 2 games out of 20. Based on Brodeur's GAA in losses, the offense doesn't just have to score 2 or 3 to win.. they need to score 4 or 5.

I was at the game in January against the Bruins, and heard fans complain first hand; that the "offense lost the game for us.. we only scored 1 goal.. gotta score more." :blahblah:
..the game was 6-1. Even if we scored 5, it wouldn't have been enough.
  • 2


#1086384 Stuff Devils Fans Don't Say

Posted by Beezer34 on 30 January 2012 - 12:14 AM

"..did you pre-order the new third jersey yet?"
  • 1


#1076116 Just imagine a sold out rock full of devils fans

Posted by Beezer34 on 24 December 2011 - 10:58 AM

It has nothing to do with; "strength of franchise" or having a passionate fanbase. The Rangers were here first! PERIOD!
..the sooner people realize that, the better.

------------------------------------

Today the Jets play the Giants @ MetLife (Giants) stadium. Although the Jets are the home-team, I fully expect a 60/40 (possibly 50/50) split, between the fans in attendance.

Does this have anything to do with strength of franchise? --NO. The Jets are valued as one of the highest revenue organizations in sports.
Does this have anything to do with the Jets being a competitive team? --NO. The Jets have only 3 losing seasons, since 1997.
Does this have anything to do with the Jets being a newer team? --NO. The franchise was started in 1959.

..this is because of 1 reason, and 1 reason only. The Giants were here first! End of sentence.

------------------------------------

I'm actually astonished that we're averaging nearly 15,000 thus-far this season. The arena holds 17,000. What the fvck do people want?! :noclue:
The NEW YORK RANGERS are ranked 15th in the league in attendance!!! And that's fvcking NEW YORK! Why should I expect anything more from a 29 year old hockey franchise, in the tri-state area?! All things considered, I am extremely proud of the Devils following!

EDIT: I also think you're missing the point of what an economic recession really is.
People can't go to games, because people can't afford it. The majority of the country is on budget. The family man no longer has any type of disposable income.

..sick and tired of these fvcking threads. :blahblah:
  • 3


#977489 Jamie Langenbrunner Appreciation Thread

Posted by Beezer34 on 07 January 2011 - 12:22 PM

I remember that 2001-2002 season very well. I was thrilled when we got Jamie. For nearly 10 years, he has been a great player for the Devils.. and an all around nice guy.
....thanks for the memories Langs. You'll be missed. :clap2:
  • 2


#975656 Marty is now the "co-#1" goaltender - sharing duties

Posted by Beezer34 on 04 January 2011 - 12:32 PM

....not sure how this topic deformed into a; Brodeur's Legacy debate. :noclue:
Marty's been garbage this season, simple as that. He doesn't deserve to be the clear starter for the Devils. He's looked sloppy, he's looked old, he's looked slow.. no two ways about it. I commend the decision to have Co. #1 goaltenders the rest of the season. Rotate them both game-to-game, and whoever plays better.. plays more. -Period.

Now having said that, how does this season take away from 3 Stanley Cups.. 2 Olympic Gold Medals.. 4 Vezina's.. 5 Jennings.. 1 Calder Memorial.. 10 All`Stars.. 600+ wins.. 100+ shutouts.. a World Cup & Challenge Bowl? :huh:
  • 2


#975058 NFL Week 17...

Posted by Beezer34 on 02 January 2011 - 09:30 PM

say what u want but it is prettyremarkable that at 10-6, the giants missed the playoffs


....it's only remarkable because it's the NFC.. where @ 7-9, you can dream about hoisting up Lombardi.
2 years ago when the 11-5 Patriots missed the postseason, nobody said sh!t.
  • 1


#973640 2012 Jets Thread

Posted by Beezer34 on 29 December 2010 - 06:41 PM

I think the only AFC team they have a shot of beating is KC. I am still predicting a swift 1 and done for this team. Sanchez is dragging them down and the D has been very suspect at times. No way this team starts out on the road and wins the Super Bowl. If they do, I will be the first to come here and congratulate them on a miraculous run.


As the season has progressed, so has the laundry list of *proof stages* from Jet haters far & wide.. in an effort to look for sufficient evidence, to discredit them to the average fan.
"Beat a REAL team, and then I'll give credit" ~ "Make the playoffs, and then I'll give credit" ~ "Get to the AFC Title game again, and then I'll give credit" -etc..

..the reality is, people like you will never give credit to the "things" in your paradigm you have abolished long ago. Your theory is; "I have a foundation in hating this _______, and I must defend it"
You've patterned your concepts on dogmatism, and will not deviate from your framework one bit. Instead.. you'd rather stand there defiantly (even in the face of defeat) and make excuses, to defend your flawed logic.

If the Jets win the Superbowl, I'm sure they'll be 10 reasons of luck & fortune, to 'why it happened'.. as opposed to kudos on skill & ability.
  • 2


#972960 2012 Jets Thread

Posted by Beezer34 on 28 December 2010 - 09:14 AM

..do you still wanna take anyone up in this thread on that "sig-bet" of yours? Just askin. :whistling:
  • 1


#972885 2012 Jets Thread

Posted by Beezer34 on 27 December 2010 - 11:15 PM

joey c called out and no where 2 b found


I'm sorry. I spent the day sledding with my kids, and then went out to dinner to have a quiet meal with my wife. I'll try to prioritize my retorts in a more appropriate fashion in the future. B )

Guess you'll have to log out to read this as well...

What I wrote was hardly a rant (and everyone except you seemed to understand it perfectly Mr. Italics). Yes, Sanchez has improved from last season to this statistically, but unlike you, I pointed out that his play AS OF LATE has not been good, which for me would put a damper on the whole "statistically better than last season" observation you made, Mr. Black-and-White-I-can't-see-shades-of-gray. Most of what's made this Sanchez season better than last was accomplished early on.

I'll make it easy for you:
First 5 games: 8 TDs, 0 INT
Next 5 games: 7 TDs, 7 INT
Next 5 games: 2 TDs, 6 INT

And did you really think Sanchez wasn't going to improve on last season's 12 TDs, 20 INT, 2444 yrds and 63.0 rating?
You made a list of things that dispute the "nothing to be proud of" stance...all I did was point out that some of the things you seem to want to make sound good aren't quite as good as you're making them out to be. I get it, you're a homer and a blowhard, you always have been. NJDevs4978 and Devils Dose made more sense in their responses to me than you did...no surprise there.


"..a 'last word whore' is a person that responds to someone on impulse, without the benefit of logic. Their replies typically provide nothing other than reiteration, and immaturity. -Example: I know you are, but what am I." -Jon Stewart.

...The last time I tried to get into a meaningful conversation with you, it turned into this..


*Beezer - Out.

*CR76 - Also Out.


...In a little over a year, has anything really changed? Let's see..

In your 1st post you stated your opinion regarding: *how you'd feel if your team did just enough to get into the playoffs, after starting the season so strongly.. You reiterated the same point, in your 2nd post. You commented that my "points of pride" weren't "quite as good" as I was making them out to be in your 1st post.. and essentially said the same thing in your 2nd post. In your 1st post, you responded with "the last 5 games" schtick for Mark Sanchez regarding his season.. and then further broke it down some more in your 2nd post.
I was called a blowhard in your 1st post... I was called a blowhard in your 2nd post.. etc. --You beginning to get the picture here? :mellow:

..so let me ask you, what exactly was the point in posting your 2nd response? :noclue: What was it you were trying to prove?
You laid it all out quite clearly the 1st go around, and I responded. I brought up why I was pointing out the positive's of the Jets season.. commented on the Sanchez last 5 games routine.. and I even sprinkled in some reasoning as to the "low standards" crack.
So please, tell me.. what on earth did the 2nd post provide? :huh:

Now hold on. I'm sure your answer is going to be; "because you didn't understand me the first time" ..but here's the thing.. I DID! I got it.. loud & clear. There's nothing that you said, that I didn't either already know, or couldn't look up on ESPN. My post was me explaining my point of view, and you interjected.. explaining yourself like a semi retard by saying; "well, Beezer just went way overboard.. and I had to step in." --who the fvck are you?! What are you, the judicioual police.. patrolling njdevs for what you feel are homer\objective posts?! I'm supposed to take you seriously or something? You have; enjoys-hating-the-Jets, in your profile.. and your unbiased opinion is supposed to mean a damn, to the people in this thread? :rofl: You should've simply opened your drivel with; "My opinion is better than yours, and here's why." That at least would've been honest.

The REAL answer to the question of "what did the 2nd post provide" is.. nothing!
..the 2nd post provided nothing. Nothing more than recycled bullsh!t, in a feeble attempt to try and get the parting shot. I'm sure you must've taken great pride in writing your post, ---which you then went on to edit 3x, over the course of what was a half hour later, most likely rereading it over and over again.. adding empty statistics no one other than yourself could give a sh!t about. But here's a tip going forward.. THINK! Like the old adage goes; "look before you leap". I know the knee jerk reaction for people like you is; `QUICK, RESPOND! I MUST HAVE THE LAST WORD! -But stop and think a little. `What exactly is it that I'm writing?? Is it something worthy of posting.. or is it just rewording of what I said prior? If it's the latter.. what's the point? :noclue:
You're allegedly 40 years old, and this is the 2nd time you have attempted to get into a tit-for-tat game with me. (God only knows who else on this board) And make no mistake about it.. your 2nd post is the definition of tit-for-tat. Beyond the garnishes of; *Mr. Black-and-White.. *Mr. Italics.. and finally, *Mr. I-can't-see-shades-of-gray.. what was the true difference between your 1st & 2nd post, Mr. Reiterate? Was is something(s) of prominence and knowledge.. or just more emphasis on everything you said in the first post?
Furthermore.. my post of: things to be proud of, was retaliatory. I was defending my team with multiple points of facts. I didn't just say; "Hey everybody.. look how great the Jets are!!" It was a post in DEFENSE.. something both NJDevs4978 & Devils Dose (2 people you sited as agreeing with you when they never did) in fact pointed out to YOU!

If you took any litigation courses in college, you'd know.. the proceedings are equal. Ergo; the defense rests! Yet, that doesn't apply to you here on njdevs does it? Your train of thought seems to be bully mentality. ie: *You started it, I finish it* -or- *I started it.. I still finish it*
So please, say whatever it is you have to say, because I know you won't be able to leave it as is.. despite the fact that YOU attacked me... and then go away! I swear I won't respond again.. just go away. You can go on continuing to "enjoy hating the Yankees & Jets" ..and we'll all go on ignoring your posts, right here in this thread. Is that a deal?

..now be a good trained seal, and prove me right. :thumbsup:
  • 1


#930839 2012 Jets Thread

Posted by Beezer34 on 14 September 2010 - 11:33 AM

24 hours after the tailgating.. after the rain.. after greenday.. and after all the heartbreak last nights game fed the Gang Green faithful.. I send one message to my fellow Jet fans: *We will be fine!

After a week hearing about *all-the-weapons* the Ravens have.. "Heap, Boldin, Rice, Flacco, Houshmandzadeh, McGahee, " :blahblah: ..this star-studded cast of ProBowlers.. managed to score.... one..... single.....touchdown! Thus.. their 1 touchdown was, ultimately, enough to beat the Jets offense. (which really isn't saying much)
..and as much as that sums up what an utter disgrace the Jets offense is.. it's also a testament to our defense. A defense without 3 of our starters I might add. (Pace, Jenkins, & Pool)
Not-withstanding.. when you give your opponent over 100 yards in field position, off 14 penalties.. you make it extremely difficult to mount any kind of momentum.

I maintain however, in the end, this is the first game of the season. Pump your brakes.. take a deep breath, and relax. Take a step back, and look at the overall picture. We lost to a Superbowl caliber team by 1 point people! Excuse me, if I don't echo the doom-&-gloom outlook that some others may share.
Someone once said; "It's not how you start, it's how you finish." Let me translate beyond that --> WEEK 1 MEANS NOTHING!! Yes.... the Jets are 0-1. As are the Vikings... the Cowboys... the Colts... Atlanta.. Philly.. SD.. Cincinnati.. etc. Call me crazy, but I believe, these teams will be just fine come November. :thumbsup:


---------------------------------
EDIT: I'm not sour grapes. Congratulations to Baltimore. Their defense is awesome.. Flacco is unquestionably the real-deal.. and yes, they may very well be the best team in the Conference...
...but let's not fool ourselves here folks.... 10-9?? This game could've went either way.


I am leaning towards Sanchez just not being very good.


He's 23 years old bro.. give him a break\some time. Yesterday was his 19th career game, against quite possibly the best defense in the league. You remember what Giant fans were saying about their beloved quarterback after he was taken to the woodshed? It took Eli 4 years to develop. Can we give Sanchez at least half that?
  • 1


#928037 2012 Jets Thread

Posted by Beezer34 on 05 September 2010 - 10:10 PM

Great read Beezer. I agree on a lot of points you made. I also think the rb situation will be better this season. Sanchez worries me. He's either been over throwing or under throwing the recievers and is still trying to force the ball into double coverage. The INTs need to come down this season for this team to succeed.


Sadly these are the growing pains of drafting a 22 year old kid, and him thinking he's invincible.. and able to make any throw. He'll learn..
..and besides, there's always Brunell. ;)

nicely written beez.
the record is about right. 10-6 sounds a tad better though.
just make sure you update the offense section. not sure if you know this or not but tony richardson was released tonight


...yeah, I did hear about that.
However, I really feel this move was just another way to save a buck. *AKA; He'll be back in time for Week 2.

This appears to be the latest craze the Jets have been manipulating throughout the entire offseason. They release a veteran (after he goes through training camp\preseason) just to resign him again after the first game of the regular season, for the sole purpose of having his contract non-guaranteed.. thereby paying him $50k per week, and being able to cut him off the roster at any moment during the year.
After hearing RR's quotes regarding the team (and watching Hardknocks) there are 3 players I feel the Jets will bring in, come time for the Patriots game. Adalius Thomas.. Laveranues Coles.. and now, Tony Richardson. I'm even hearing Ty Law's name being thrown around. (as he is best friends with Darrelle Revis) Really not sure why they're looking to save all this money here and there. Maybe they're ready to cave into DR's demands.

*Edit: You want to talk about CBA circumvention? (in regards to Kovalchuk\NHL) The NFL needs to squash this gimmick ASAP. It's disrespectful.. it's dirty tactics.. and it's just plain lame.
  • 1


#927687 2012 Jets Thread

Posted by Beezer34 on 04 September 2010 - 01:08 PM

JETS SEASON IN REVIEW
------------------------------------------------------------

Defense.
*Secondary:
Obviously Revis not being here hurts. Okay.. it really, REALLY hurts. But as RR said on the first episode of Hardknocks; "a good defense aint all about just one player." If this were last season, and all we had left back there was Lito Sheppard.. I'd feel a hell of alot more uneasy. But the secondary this season, should be more of a factor for Jets. I expect Jim Leonhard to take an enormous step forward this year. At 27 years old, he's just now entering his prime, and most importantly.. (with a season already under his belt as a Jet) he knows the system that much more. Though I'm not ga-ga over Kyle Wilson, the way everyone else seems to be.. I think he has incredible upside as a player, and could prove to be an above average CB throughout the league, within the next 2-3 years. Losing Rhodes -for- Pool was, in my opinion, a misstep and shame.. however, I don't feel the downside is that significant in terms of ability as I had thought it was going to be. Most importantly (when the dust settles) I STILL feel Darrelle will play for the New York Jets this season at some point. The sheer notion of Revis & Cromartie makes the hair rise from the back of my neck. Here's hoping DR comes to his senses relatively soon.. fires his agent(s).. and starts playing football again.
*Front 7:
WOW.. what can you say? Kris Jenkins.. David Harris.. Jason Taylor.. Bart Scott.. Shaun Ellis.. On paper, this group has all the talent.. all the tools.. and all the credentials you could ask for. I absolutely love the fact that RR moved Gholston to DE. Though I don't put that much stock into the preseason, I really like the way Vernon ended it with a BANG! I also find it odd that the Jets, in the wake of the Calvin Pace injury, would release 7 LB's (Foley, Knicky, Laury, Mauga, Lee, Reamer, & Satele) on cut day this morning. This basically leaves only Cummings & Westerman (both extremely raw) left for linebacker depth on the roster. It is for this reason I believe the signing of Adalius Thomas is a foregone conclusion, after Week 1.. thereby making his salary non-guaranteed.
Bottomline, if this group can stay healthy.. I am confident they will do more than their fair share of putting points on the board as a defense should.

------------------------------------------------------------

Offense.
*Through the air:
Same thing here like the defense. On paper, it looks great.. now let's see them put it into action. I know the preseason cast a bleak cloud over the 'O.. but again, that's what preseason is for. Though the big spotlights will be on Dustin Keller & Braylon Edwards.. I think J'Co is going to have an excellent year. At the start of last season, he was the Jets #1, in front of Clowney & Stuckey. This season however, Cotchery is a player that can slip under the radar. He knows the system better than any of the other WR's on the team, and his route-running is the best I've seen since Santana Moss. Laveranues Coles will be back for Week 2.. and he should fill in fine, until Santonio Holmes comes back from his suspension. If each receiver can overcome their own corresponding bug-a-boo's (ie: injuries.. dropped passes.. etc) this is a talented bunch, that should help Sanchez considerably, in his own development.
*On the ground:
I don't care what anyone says.. LT > Jones. *PERIOD! The Chargers really did a good job here, trying to fork the blame over on Tomlinson this offseason, when the sad fact remains. They forgot how to use LT. LaDainian's faster than Jones.. younger than Jones.. has better hands than Jones.. and after this season, will prove to be better than Thomas Jones. I really don't want to get into this any further, because I could write another 8 paragraphs on my thoughts and feelings regarding LT. I'll just end it by saying.. Though the rest of the free world laughed out loud when the Jets signed Tomlinson, I stood up and cheered. We will make San Diego look like fools for releasing him after this season. Book It!
Greene will have a better year.. Richardson will get his usual 10-15 touches this season.. and (although he may hit people well) the Terminator still has much to learn. I'd also like to see more of Chauncey Washington.

------------------------------------------------------------

*Special Teams:
Mike Westhoff. It starts and ends there. He's the best at what he does, and he knows exactly the types of players to pick. I don't trust Joe McKnight with PR & KR duties at all. Leave that to Brad Smith, and Danny Woodhead. Nick Folk may trump Jay Feely in kickoffs, but not at FG's Jet fans. Sorry. Not when you're missing PAT's. Weatherford's the best punter we've had since Ben Graham. I like him alot.

------------------------------------------------------------

Game-by-Game:
Week 1: vs. Ravens - WIN
Week 2: vs. Patriots - WIN
Week 3: vs. Dolphins - LOSE
Week 4: vs. Bills - WIN
Week 5: vs. Vikings - LOSE
Week 6: vs. Broncos - WIN
Week 7: vs. BYE
Week 8: vs. Packers - WIN
Week 9: vs. Lions - WIN
Week 10: vs. Browns - WIN
Week 11: vs. Texans - WIN
Week 12: vs. Bengals - LOSE
Week 13: vs. Patriots - LOSE
Week 14: vs. Dolphins - WIN
Week 15: vs. Steelers - LOSE
Week 16: vs. Bears - WIN
Week 17: vs. Bills - WIN

Prediction: 11-5 record.

Posted Image


I'm glad it's September again MD. I missed our back-&-forth's ;)
  • 1


#811410 Evaluating Sanchez (Jets Scepticism)

Posted by Beezer34 on 23 October 2009 - 12:08 AM

Posted Image

While retaining all the prime talent from last season.. (Kerry Rhodes, Leon Washington, Dustin Keller) in addition; cutting some of the old-dead-weight.. (Ty Law, Laveranues Coles, Bubba Franks, etc) coupled with all the acquisitions.. (Bart Scott, Lito Sheppard, Braylon Edwards) Are the Jets a better team (at least on paper) then they were last season? 'Yes! -Yet after half-a-dozen games played, they sit @ .500 with a 3-3 record. (the same record they were after 6 games last season) So what gives right? :unsure:

*Well let's look at the 3 loses. #1.`New Orleans: Sanchez finishes the game with 4 turnovers, (1 Fumble - 3 INT's) 2 of the 4 turnovers result in touchdowns, which... by matter of points, are the exact number the Saints beat the Jets by. (14) #2.`Miami: Sanchez (looking average at best) doesn't show up throughout the game until nearly the 3rd quarter, complete's half of his passes, and ultimately gets outshined by Henne. The Dolphins go on to squeeze out a victory.. by 4 points.. with 3 seconds remaining in the game. #3.`Buffalo: Do I really need to even write a description here? Sanchez's worst game of the season. 5 picks.. completed 10 out of 30 passes.. and an 8 (YES EIGHT) QB Rating for the evening. STILL, despite all of this (AND the fact Jenkins, Smith, & Cotchery are all absent from this game) the Jets stay in the game until OT, where they lose a nailbiter to the Bills 16-13.
Okay, now let's recap: ~Of the Jets 3 loses. `Dirty Sanchez: *8 INT's.. *39.8 QB Rt.. *44 Cmp%... *1 TD... *3 Fumbles... -&- has been Sacked for *50 yrds. :blink:

The Point? Sanchez, PLAYING LIKE A DOG through all 3 of the Jets loses, has turned the ball over 11 FVCKING TIMES between fumbles & picks! THE JETS (somehow) HAVE STAYED IN EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THESE GAMES DESPITE #6! Are the Jets 3-3 with (A HEALTHY) Favre this season? -No fvcking way!! More like 4-2 imo. (who knows, maybe even 5-1) I think after this year ends with the Vikings, and all the dust settles.. alot of people are going to owe #4 an apology. There's a reason why his season with the Jets last year started to tank, right around the same time he tore the biceps tendon. (in his throwing arm for Christ sake) How's he look this season after surgery? The disparity within this Jets team is stunning. The squad itself is built for "Win-Now" mode... although, the quarterback's a 22 year old rookie. :yea:

I'm sick of hearing: "These are the growing pains of a rookie QB" -&- "Oh, you just gotta wait when it comes to Sanchez" -Please Stop! Jets fans have been waiting 40 years.
I miss Brett.
  • 1




Positive SSL on a transparent background