Jump to content


Member Since 26 Jun 2010
Offline Last Active Aug 25 2014 01:12 PM

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Lou, Harris speak

17 August 2014 - 10:58 AM

as far as bettman goes on riding a hard line if and more likely when kovalchuk comes back... you would have to think that he would be willing to get kovy back in the nhl with open arms. kovy is a top player in the league and he dipped to go to another league.. people like watching him you want the nhl to have all of the top talent right? so im pretty sure he would be more willing to have him come back.. as far as lou goes, kovy leaving was just an all arounf great thing. too great of a happening to not have been a mutual agreement which is why i dont understand why people get so upset about it and still a year later.. if you dont realize that then i dont know i guess you just dont understand or see the entire happening of the situation, so with this yes when the timing is right i absolutely think lou will have kovy back if kovy wants to come back.

You're wrong.  Let me quote the article as evidence to why you're wrong.  He said, "You'd never look at someone coming back at 35."  Lou literally dodges every question about Kovalchuk because he's done with him. 

So he's 35, and then has to wait an entire year of not playing, so he's 36 if he were to come back.  It's not happening.  I would agree with you if Kovy pulled his stunt when he was 25 or 26, but he pulled that sh!t when he was 30.


“I’ll answer that the best way you can. He cannot come back until he is 35. He’s (31) now. You’d never look at someone coming back at 35 when he’s (31),” the GM explained.  - Lou

In Topic: Lou, Harris speak

17 August 2014 - 09:15 AM

Clemmenson... wow uh... that's quite a very sarcastic post shut down by one word.

Notice how I said sarcastically, PLENTY OF RECENT EVIDENCE.  I guess my counter-point to your post is now invalid.  Clemmenson is one signing within two years.  I guess one signing that fits your argument is all you need man.  Wow is right.  I like how you defended you're argument with plenty of evidence of recent instances to back up your stupid jab at Lou.  You used the word "obsession".  Obsession to me would mean it happens every year or very often.  It's not an obsession and you're just looking to take every little stupid jab you can because you think it's funny. 

Scoreboard: 7 Recent acquisitions(non-Devils):1 former Devil acq
1. Who was lucky to play as often as he did when he was a Devil
2. Is by no means a lock to play on the Devils this year(see Janssen, Cam)

In Topic: Lou, Harris speak

16 August 2014 - 07:58 PM

Scott Clemmenson was brought back though in fairness.

Dammit! lol

Yes, Clemmer was brought back, but how likely is it that he even makes the team??  It's kind of like saying, hey we brought back Cam Janssen again!

In Topic: Lou, Harris speak

16 August 2014 - 07:56 PM

I don't read minds, I read words.

Never said I wanted JVB back. Thankfully the new owners have plenty cash to make up for their disappointing attitude towards the fans.

You read words??!?  Dude, like 2-5 people quoted WORDS directly fom the article that I'm pretty sure Harris and Lou said.  In fact, my first post in the thread is filled with words too.  Check it out. :thumbsup:   I feel like I took a wrong turn somewhere and ended up on fvcking Sesame Street. 

This post is brought to you by.....WORDS  :doh1:

In Topic: Lou, Harris speak

16 August 2014 - 07:33 PM

? is there any doubt that Lou wouldnt want to bring him back? Kovy was a Devils... and left.... of course Lou would bring him back once he's older. thats his obsession haha

Wait, that obsession that he played on in this offseason?  No...can't be, we brought in Cammalleri and Havlat, not former Devils.  Maybe it was just LAST summer, right? That has to be it.....Wait....no...It was Ryder, Olesz, Brunner, and Clowe.  MAYBE Ruutu!?  sh!t, not him either.  WAIT, Lou will definitely sign Brian Gionta to unite the Gionta brothers!  Dammit, I guess that didn't happen either.  I guess that obsession is going strong with plenty of hard, recent evidence to back it up.  :rolleyes:



Positive SSL on a transparent background