Fair enough.
But you are cherry-picking by giving credence to the "nothing imminent" report, while suggesting the writer and the analysts he cites really don't know anything with respect to everything else in the article.
If your position is that the reports are based on nothing concrete, ok -- but if true it necessarily applies to everything, as there is no basis for distinguishing those parts of the piece. It simply isn't possible for the sources to know with certainty that something they don't really know anything about won't happen soon.