Random Poster Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Well, Ryan Carter is off to a -1 already! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quinn01 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 What the fvck? That was just made up just to count the damn goal. He purposly kicked it...but it hit a devils stick so it counts? fvck that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 remember last year when Clarkson got his goal waive off? it was clearly not kicked in... fvck Toronto Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobilly45 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 it was kicked but it clearly hit salvadors stick, have to say it was the correct call. idk what chico was going on about cause he made no sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quinn01 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 (edited) There are so many discrepancies to calls and sh!t and its really starting to annoy me. You kicked it? yes? No goal. End of story. What if he kicked it and it hit Moose's pad and went in? Edited October 28, 2011 by Quinn01 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bodnar41 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 It was a kicking motion which started the momentum of the puck into the net Sooooo.........what the sh!t Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devilsfan26 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 There are so many discrepancies to calls and sh!t and its really starting to annoy me. You kicked it? yes? No goal. End of story. What if he kicked it and it hit Moose's pad and went in? That would be no goal. They got the call right, but the rule makes no sense. So Salvador should have just stopped trying to play defense so the goal wouldn't count? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Dan 56 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 (edited) Shhh. Phoenix needs to win so the NHL can finally sell them! Good goal!! Also, booooooo!!! Edited October 28, 2011 by Devil Dan 56 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beck27 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 (edited) What am I missing here?: 49.2 Goals - Kicking the puck shall be permitted in all zones. A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who uses a distinct kicking motion to propel the puck into the net. A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who kicks a puck that deflects into the net off any player, goalkeeper or official. I guess that it didn't deflect off a "player"; rather a player's stick, so it counts? Edited October 28, 2011 by Beck27 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOLLYWOOD Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 PAYBACK... just great Toronto. Next ruling against the Devs will be the Bettman vennidiction Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eldon Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 So basically, a goal is allowed because he kicked it so hard that the defending team's stick still couldn't stop the momentum of the puck from going into the net. What a crock! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Death Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 PARISE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :dance: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quinn01 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 How does it feel to get a reach around by Zach Parise? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eldon Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Way to go Zach, eat that toronto. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devhead17 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 What am I missing here?: 49.2 Goals - Kicking the puck shall be permitted in all zones. A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who uses a distinct kicking motion to propel the puck into the net. A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who kicks a puck that deflects into the net off any player, goalkeeper or official. I guess that it didn't deflect off a "player"; rather a player's stick, so it counts? Rule 49.2 (ii) A kicked puck that deflects off the stick of any player (excluding the goalkeeper’s stick) shall be ruled a good goal. Totally moronic rule but I guess the right call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOLLYWOOD Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 nice... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devilsfan26 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 I think the point of that part of the rule is so if you kick it and it's going wide and it goes off someone and into the net, then yea of course that should count. But if you kick it and it's going on net and it deflects off a defender and still manages to go in, then I don't think that should count. I think that's the intent of the rule but since it's not written that way I suppose they got it right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 im kinda okay with that rule eventhough its weird... what if a guy clearly kick it on purpose and youre de defender... are you not gonna try to clear it just in case you miss and that it goes off your stick? but on that goal seems like he kicked it over the stick but his skate followed through on the puck even after the stick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devilsfan26 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 im kinda okay with that rule eventhough its weird... what if a guy clearly kick it on purpose and youre de defender... are you not gonna try to clear it just in case you miss and that it goes off your stick? Yea but in this case he would have been better off not even trying to stop it, which is why it is a stupid rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onddeck Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 anybody got a new streaming site? no offense to anyone, but every other one ive tried is awful and choppy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quinn01 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Overall good period. Few minor mistakes, few dumb penalties, but the offense has been pretty good so far. The forecheck by Parise tonight is on. Another win after last nights would be a HUGE boost for the Devils. The team needs the extra confidence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormJosh Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 anybody got a new streaming site? no offense to anyone, but every other one ive tried is awful and choppy http://www.ilemi.me/32285/1/Watch-Phoenix-Coyotes-vs-New-Jersey-Devils/ its the coyotes feed, ok quality for internet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onddeck Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 http://www.ilemi.me/32285/1/Watch-Phoenix-Coyotes-vs-New-Jersey-Devils/ its the coyotes feed, ok quality for internet thank youuuuuuuu! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Yea but in this case he would have been better off not even trying to stop it, which is why it is a stupid rule. exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quinn01 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 :moose: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.