SterioDesign Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 4 minutes ago, thecoffeecake said: You know, I thought that as soon as I posted it. I think Vasilevski might be closer, though. truth is goalies are sooooo hard to gauge, you can be on top of the world on year than struggle to be top 15 the next season Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zubie#8 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 If Bishop is traded they probably have enough room to sign Stamkos. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Pittsburgh is asking for Calgary's first i guess http://www.thescore.com/nhl/news/1047221?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDfan1711 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 I'm also hearing Bishop to Calgary. Wouldn't surprise me a whole lot. Vasilevski/Gudklevski is an excellent tandem, although pretty inexperienced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vadvlfan Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 5 hours ago, SterioDesign said: im hearing talks about Ben Bishop to Calgary are heating up between the 2 club... also heard they were after Fleury... for sure the Flames are pushing to get a legit #1 goalie I thought Rutherford over valued the Flower. It would've solved his problems to trade him now,(Calgary) before the draft. Now he might get stuck w/ him,( a la Luongo). And lose him in expansion draft. Cest le vie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sokar Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Cap is $73M. Floor is $54M Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog2020 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Craig Custance @CraigCustance: Hearing Coyotes and defenseman Alex Goligoski closing in on a five-year deal in the neighborhood of $5.5 million per season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 i wish capgeek was still a thing so that we could easily estimate our cap based on estimated contracts that our RFA should get. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 i guess Carolina and Detroit are working on a deal for Datsyuk. From what i could gather Detroit we're offering Tomas Jurco and/or Teemu Pulkkinen. But they are apparently working on a better deal now.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog2020 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 i guess Carolina and Detroit are working on a deal for Datsyuk. From what i could gather Detroit we're offering Tomas Jurco and/or Teemu Pulkkinen. But they are apparently working on a better deal now.... There were rumors yesterday teams we're asking for Mantha or Afenasiou... If either of those guys are on the table, I'd hope Shero is involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecoffeecake Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 1 hour ago, MadDog2020 said: There were rumors yesterday teams we're asking for Mantha or Afenasiou... If either of those guys are on the table, I'd hope Shero is involved. Athanasiou would be sick. We don't have enough Greeks in the NHL, it'd be nice to get one here. Never mind the absurd skill this dude has. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sundstrom Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 getting ANYTHING of value - even a guy like jurco, would be fine if the devils are taking datsyuk contract. they don't have to pay a cent. it's a cap number for a year that they can absolutely absorb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sokar Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 I heard a rumor that Shaw from Chicago maybe on the trading block anyone interested Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommonDreads Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 Pierre LeBrun: Keith Yandle has agreed to terms with the Florida Panthers: seven years and $6.35 million average per season Rangers get a 2017 4th Rounder as part of the condition on his rights Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lateralous Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 It's kinda cool seeing the big free agents sign in places like Florida and Arizona. That's a pretty good deal for the Panthers. They basically replace the hole they were going to have with Campbell's departure with a much younger Campbell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 One thing about Yandle: the guy is an iron man. Since the 2009-10 season, his regular season games totals: 82, 82, 82, 48 (lockout season), 82, 84 (due to differences in the number of games-played between the two teams he played for), and 82. As all long-term deals go, that one could get ugly earlier than the Panthers would like...but at least they're getting a guy who's the anti-Cammalleri, as far as being able to actually stay on the damned ice goes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lateralous Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 Aaron Portzline @Aportzline now13 seconds agoMany convinced #CBJ trading the No. 3 overall pick. It's all over the place across the league. Could Jarmo know something about the Finns? If true, Davidson/Jarmo shouldn't try to get too cute with this pick. Be grateful that you got lucky in the lottery and just take Puljujarvi and then fix your team and cap in other moves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Lateralous said: It's kinda cool seeing the big free agents sign in places like Florida and Arizona. That's a pretty good deal for the Panthers. They basically replace the hole they were going to have with Campbell's departure with a much younger Campbell. It's also good to see them committing and signging there before July 1st and not using the whole "i could have more on the market" leverage thing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 (edited) 2 hours ago, SterioDesign said: It's also good to see them committing and signging there before July 1st and not using the whole "i could have more on the market" leverage thing Sure, but in this particular case, I think this was Florida deciding that they REALLY wanted this player, and making him a "OK, you can see we're not fvcking around here" offer. I think he and his agent knew, with the length of the deal being offered, that it wasn't going to get any better than this. No one else could offer more years, and I doubt anyone else would've offered more money. Edited June 23, 2016 by Colorado Rockies 1976 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 16 minutes ago, Colorado Rockies 1976 said: Sure, but in this particular case, I think this was Florida deciding that they REALLY wanted this player, and making him a "OK, you can see we're not fvcking around here" offer. I think he and his agent knew, with the length of the deal being offered, that it wasn't going to get any better than this. No one else could offer more years, and I doubt anyone else would've offered more money. yah i guess now trading for rights makes a little more sense cause you can offer that one extra year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 (edited) 47 minutes ago, SterioDesign said: yah i guess now trading for rights makes a little more sense cause you can offer that one extra year Florida didn't even have to go that far (they could've maxed out at eight years)...by offering seven, all any other team could do was match the length at best (Florida really would've been bidding against themselves by offering that 8th year off the bat)...who knows if someone else would've been willing to match the cash too. It wouldn't surprise me if, once the offer was made, Florida simply said something in the realm of "The very best offer you're going to get is the one on the table. You can waste your time and ours by trying to see if you can do better." I'm guessing Florida probably had some inkling that Yandle wasn't dead-set against signing with them...but even if they didn't, it was only going to cost them a 6th-rounder. I don't blame them for rolling the dice. Very aggressive by the Panthers...they decided that Yandle was their guy and were willing to go pretty damned far to ensure that they got him, and that he would never have any motivation to test the market. Edited June 23, 2016 by Colorado Rockies 1976 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 (edited) Just now, Colorado Rockies 1976 said: oops dp Edited June 23, 2016 by Colorado Rockies 1976 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triumph Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 You cannot offer an extra year unless a player was on your roster as of the trade deadline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 1 minute ago, Triumph said: You cannot offer an extra year unless a player was on your roster as of the trade deadline. Good to know. So scratch everything I said about that 8th year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevsMan84 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 Yandle was one of the pending UFA that I was hoping the Devils would target. I wouldn't have minded that we overpay for him either. However, that contract Florida gave him is nuts and naturally an overpayment (yes I know most UFA contracts are overpayment). Team was missing that dimension that Zidlicky gave to their defense and it showed. Very little offense generated from the blue line and unless something changes in a hurry it looks like Larsson is not going to be the offensive and PP quarterback beast we were hoping for when we drafted him. Not saying he is not a good player (IMO him and Greene are our clear cut top 2 D-men), but was hoping he could have picked up some of the slack that was left when Zidlicky was traded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.