Jump to content

2018 NFL Season


Daniel

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Daniel said:

Welp, 3-0 allowed for more wishful thinking than Dolphins typically get in any particular season.  It really is a matter of waiting for the Pats dynasty to end before any other team in the AFC East is worth watching again.

I find NFL football in general not to be that great to watch these days.  The game is just horribly unbalanced (defenses are more unsure now more than ever what they can actually do without getting flagged) and officiating is all over the place.  Do I still watch?  Sure.  But it just doesn't feel like "football" to me...I get that certain things had to change for the sake of player safety, but 43-40 and 38-31 track meets just feels off.  As do constant 300-yard passing games and QB numbers more bloated than ever. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MadDog2020 said:

Every season is the same. Nothing ever changes. Also, Wilson and Stills both went down yesterday, Wilson probably for the season, adding to the unending list of injuries to key players. They are gonna get absolutely torched in Houston Thursday night. It’s gonna be painful. 

I'm more concerned with Stills missing time than Wilson.  Wilson has had some awesome plays obviously, but the biggest ones were trick plays that only work a few times in a season.  There's also enough redundancy with Amendola and Grant, and you could even, gasp, split out Drake every once in a while.  And maybe Parker finally takes off the diapers and does something, even if it's just to up his trade value a little.

The other rumor is that Amari Cooper is on the trade block.  Supposedly, Oakland is asking for a first, but I imagine that drops to a second.  If by some miracle, the Dolphins are still in the playoff hunt by then, I'd make that trade.

EDIT:  And for my latest crazy idea, what do you think the Giants would give us for Tannehill if Herbert stays in college another year as has been reported?

Edited by Daniel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Daniel said:

EDIT:  And for my latest crazy idea, what do you think the Giants would give us for Tannehill if Herbert stays in college another year as has been reported?

A ham sandwich and a 6-pack of Rolling Rock.

38 minutes ago, Daniel said:

Welp, Cooper just traded to Dallas for their 1st, so there goes that idea and my belief that he wouldn't bring back that much.

A 1 for Cooper lmfao. Jerry Jones is such a clown.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2018 at 3:15 PM, Daniel said:

Welp, Cooper just traded to Dallas for their 1st, so there goes that idea and my belief that he wouldn't bring back that much.

Your belief is correct. A 1 for Cooper is absurd but Jerry Jones sometimes does absurd things. I would've given up the 3 we got for Bridgewater for Cooper but I would outright reject even a 2 for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2018 at 1:38 PM, Daniel said:

I'm more concerned with Stills missing time than Wilson.  Wilson has had some awesome plays obviously, but the biggest ones were trick plays that only work a few times in a season.  There's also enough redundancy with Amendola and Grant, and you could even, gasp, split out Drake every once in a while.  And maybe Parker finally takes off the diapers and does something, even if it's just to up his trade value a little.

The other rumor is that Amari Cooper is on the trade block.  Supposedly, Oakland is asking for a first, but I imagine that drops to a second.  If by some miracle, the Dolphins are still in the playoff hunt by then, I'd make that trade.

EDIT:  And for my latest crazy idea, what do you think the Giants would give us for Tannehill if Herbert stays in college another year as has been reported?

I could see the Giants having interest in Tannehill as a potential stop gap that could develop into a long term answer for them. Thing is they do have Lauletta and may just decide to roll with him in 2019 and stockpile the picks . Tannehill (and I think the cost would be a 2nd&5th) would mean the Giants are looking at a retool and an immediate turnaround, but I think they may he hunkering down for a long and painful rebuild.

Giants are headed for some dark dark years.

Edited by '7'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, '7' said:

I could see the Giants having interest in Tannehill as a potential stop gap that could develop into a long term answer for them. Thing is they do have Lauletta and may just decide to roll with him in 2019 and stockpile the picks . Tannehill (and I think the cost would be a 2nd&5th) would mean the Giants are looking at a retool and an immediate turnaround, but I think they may he hunkering down for a long and painful rebuild.

Giants are headed for some dark dark years.

Depending on their cap situation, a Rams like turn around isn't out of the question.  Meaning, it wouldn't happen immediately, but after a season or two, things just click. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, '7' said:

Buffalo won't win this game because they are an abomination but holding it to 12-6 well into the 4th Q is pretty impressive.

They played very hard, and their crowd was everything you'd want a home crowd to be.  Unfortunately for them, their QBs just give them damned near no chance to win right now...but when they get some breaks, they can definitely surprise some teams...just ask the Vikings.  I'm sure the Titans are wondering how the hell they lost too.  The Bills do compete.

Saw a mention of the current crop of rookie QBs in the Jets thread, and I don't know how anyone can really judge these guys based off these samples...there's just not enough games yet.  It's definitely easier to have more success quicker now as a rookie QB than it was back in the day (they usually looked pretty awful that first year), but it's still VERY difficult for most guys to not have that year on the bench (like Mahomes did) to take everything in and to have to learn right away as you go.  It used to be around Year 3 or 4 (for QBs who jumped right into starting slots) that you'd be able to see what you really had...now it's more Year 2 that you expect to see significant progress, with some guys already looking very polished...with Year 3 being the "OK, now this guy should be pretty close to being what he'll be from here on out, if he's not already" season (as long as enough other pieces are in place). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of the recent guys that have jumped in year two like Goff and Trubisky also had coaching changes to more offensive minded head coaches and it looks like the Browns are going the same way. God help us if the Jets don’t fire Bowles and/or get another defense first coach to replace him. Bruce Coslet might have been the last legit offensive coach they hired..three DECADES ago. And he was a second choice to Holmgren who snubbed us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, NJDevs4978 said:

A lot of the recent guys that have jumped in year two like Goff and Trubisky also had coaching changes to more offensive minded head coaches and it looks like the Browns are going the same way. God help us if the Jets don’t fire Bowles and/or get another defense first coach to replace him. Bruce Coslet might have been the last legit offensive coach they hired..three DECADES ago. And he was a second choice to Holmgren who snubbed us.

And the conservative three yards and a cloud of dust offensive coordinators we've employed to go along wit them. Tony Sparano, Paul Hackett. Brian Schottenheimer was not Mr. Creative either and a lot of his fathers super conservative tendencies crept in with him as well. I don't know what's the cutoff regarding wins and Bowles coming back, but I get the feeling if it's 7-9 he returns. Anything worse and he's gone

Edited by '7'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Colorado Rockies 1976 said:

They played very hard, and their crowd was everything you'd want a home crowd to be.  Unfortunately for them, their QBs just give them damned near no chance to win right now...but when they get some breaks, they can definitely surprise some teams...just ask the Vikings.  I'm sure the Titans are wondering how the hell they lost too.  The Bills do compete.

Saw a mention of the current crop of rookie QBs in the Jets thread, and I don't know how anyone can really judge these guys based off these samples...there's just not enough games yet.  It's definitely easier to have more success quicker now as a rookie QB than it was back in the day (they usually looked pretty awful that first year), but it's still VERY difficult for most guys to not have that year on the bench (like Mahomes did) to take everything in and to have to learn right away as you go.  It used to be around Year 3 or 4 (for QBs who jumped right into starting slots) that you'd be able to see what you really had...now it's more Year 2 that you expect to see significant progress, with some guys already looking very polished...with Year 3 being the "OK, now this guy should be pretty close to being what he'll be from here on out, if he's not already" season (as long as enough other pieces are in place). 

I was impressed with McCoy as well. Still has a world of talent but late in his career he's totally wasting his time in Buffalo right now. They really should've moved him this deadline

You're right about  how quickly young QB's turn into impact players relative to past years. Also has to do with just how slanted the league is towards offense. QB's nowadays don't have to make 12-15 tight window throws like in the past but maybe only a handful per game. Every game has receivers making circus catches aided by ridiculous sticky gloves. It's cartoonish

Though the league does adjust to guys who take it by storm and if you don't put the work in the league will swallow you up and you'll be done. Derek Anderson, Josh Freeman, Matt Flynn, Vince Young, RG3 etc

Edited by '7'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pats really haven't had a good defense in a long time.  Brady's covered up for a lot there through the years.  They'll still likely win their division, but I think KC will eat them for lunch if they have to go to Arrowhead come playoff time.  

And this run isn't going to last forever...it's already been insanely long.  Not like it wasn't successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, CarterforPresident said:

True. The division has been garbage for a long time to. Everything must come to an end at some point.  Still can't be they dealt Cooks

Every now and then BB has to do something just to prove how smart he is.  Dealing Cooks was just asinine. 

I think TB and BB are still working together almost exclusively due to past success, but I think their relationship is pretty frayed now.  They've done their best to keep that under wraps, but I think they're plenty sick of each other now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.