Jump to content

2019 Offseason Thread


Daniel

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, mfitz804 said:

And not just stats. Things like community work,  longevity, etc. also factor in. Dano deserved it, so does Luongo. 

Dano contributed to winning as well, not just being one of the only good players on a horrendous team. Roberto basically had his career wasted away in Florida and charity work is nice and all but so many guys around the league do it that it shouldn't have anything to do with retiring a jersey.

This feels more like I'm a sorry we wasted your time down here, here's a moment to make up for it but hey not my team so I really don't care and they are always involved in talks of relocating so might not matter in the long run anyway lol

Edited by Satans Hockey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, the jersey retirement is about what that specific player meant to that specific team. Luongo was a huge part of the team and community, whether he had on-ice success or not. He is a hall of fame player who played most of his career with Florida, and played for them for nearly half of their entire history. 

We have been so incredibly lucky to have the Hall of Fame players and success that we have had and I think it allows us to hold the number retirement thing to a higher standard than a team like Florida. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Satans Hockey said:

Dano contributed to winning as well, not just being one of the only good players on a horrendous team. Roberto basically had his career wasted away in Florida and charity work is nice and all but so many guys around the league do it that it shouldn't have anything to do with retiring a jersey.

This feels more like I'm a sorry we wasted your time down here, here's a moment to make up for it but hey not my team so I really don't care and they are always involved in talks of relocating so might not matter in the long run anyway lol

So he played well on a sh!tty team, so the team can’t retire numbers because they’re sh!tty? That makes no sense. 

He’s arguably the best retired player in the history of the franchise. That’s enough reason to retire his number,whether or not the team was good shouldn’t be a factor. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mfitz804 said:

So he played well on a sh!tty team, so the team can’t retire numbers because they’re sh!tty? That makes no sense. 

He’s arguably the best retired player in the history of the franchise. That’s enough reason to retire his number,whether or not the team was good shouldn’t be a factor. 

More so because almost his entire career there was absolutely meaningless. Meaningless games, meaningless wins, meaningless stats. Much like 6 of the past 7 seasons that we have watched the Devils play. All rather forgettable. 

He's arguably their best retired player because they don't have much at all to even choose from to begin with. After him it's Pavel Bure and then a decent drop off in terms of all time Panthers players. 

I guess it still beats this at least lol... 

https://miamiherald.typepad.com/flapanthers/2010/10/panthers-honor-torrey-with-banner-gifts-team-also-retires-no-93-grabner-back-in-town.html

Edited by Satans Hockey
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mfitz804 said:

So he played well on a sh!tty team, so the team can’t retire numbers because they’re sh!tty? That makes no sense. 

He’s arguably the best retired player in the history of the franchise. That’s enough reason to retire his number,whether or not the team was good shouldn’t be a factor. 

Just my opinion, but disagree with the bolded.  What are they honoring by retiring his number?  What legacy are they cementing?  A decade of mediocrity and irrelevancy?

He's a legend off the ice and he'll be in the HOF for his individual accomplishments but that doesn't translate to a franchise retiring a number, in my opinion.

This seems so amateur to me.

23 minutes ago, Satans Hockey said:

More so because almost his entire career there was absolutely meaningless. Meaningless games, meaningless wins, meaningless stats. Much like 6 of the past 7 seasons that we have watched the Devils play. All rather forgettable. 

He's arguably their best retired player because they don't have much at all to even choose from to begin with. After him it's Pavel Bure and then a decent drop off in terms of all time Panthers players. 

+1

Seems ridiculous to retire his number, but what do I know.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team sucked yes but this is a recognition of individual accomplishment. The team sucking made his play that much more impressive as a goaltender. Was their best player, was loyal to the organization, did a lot in the community, Luongo deserves to have his # retired there.

15 hours ago, SterioDesign said:

i don't really agree that you have to have won cups in order to get your # retired though. A cup is a team award. Getting your # retired should be based on personal achievements. 

I mean is there really a need to point out that great players never won cups and average players won it multiple times?... Chris Kunitz has 4 cups and guys like Stamkos or Joe Thornton 0. No one in their right mind would think Kunitz # should be retired vs the other 2

Yeah, the old Dan Marino vs Trent Dilfer case. Give me Marino as my qb.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as retiring Luongo’s number goes...I guess that I’m simply indifferent.  I don’t feel any real passion one way or the other.  

With him, his career was kinda odd.  True, he definitely played on his share of bad teams, and as Chico Resch can tell you, playing on bad teams can wreak havoc on a goaltender’s numbers...but in spite of that, Luongo did manage some nice glamour numbers...plenty of very good save%s.  And almost won 500 games (and played in over 1000 regular season games, which puts him in extremely rare company).  Like Marty and Roy, he had an insanely long prime.  Lou is obviously going to the HHoF.

But something just seems missing when it comes to him...and I’m not just talking about championships.  I can’t quite put my finger on it...his career never quite felt as good to me as his numbers suggest.  Like I said, not opposed to the Panthers retiring his number, but I don’t know why I’m not much more strongly in favor of it than I am.  I guess I’d like to feel like DD56 and many others do, but for some reason I don’t.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, moustic said:

With Valimaki from Flames being injured for loooong time... Does it make Vatanen a sexy trade for them ? 
I know that Vatanen's trade is not always supported but what if the price is right ? What can we get from them ? 

I should have talk about Luongo instead ; ) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Antiquated Colorado Rockie said:

The team sucked yes but this is a recognition of individual accomplishment. The team sucking made his play that much more impressive as a goaltender. Was their best player, was loyal to the organization, did a lot in the community, Luongo deserves to have his # retired there.

Yeah, the old Dan Marino vs Trent Dilfer case. Give me Marino as my qb.

I have no idea who you're talking about but i'm sure it's a good examples yes... i assume they are football players based on the "qb" tho... haha

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Colorado Rockies 1976 said:

As far as retiring Luongo’s number goes...I guess that I’m simply indifferent.  I don’t feel any real passion one way or the other.  

With him, his career was kinda odd.  True, he definitely played on his share of bad teams, and as Chico Resch can tell you, playing on bad teams can wreak havoc on a goaltender’s numbers...but in spite of that, Luongo did manage some nice glamour numbers...plenty of very good save%s.  And almost won 500 games (and played in over 1000 regular season games, which puts him in extremely rare company).  Like Marty and Roy, he had an insanely long prime.  Lou is obviously going to the HHoF.

But something just seems missing when it comes to him...and I’m not just talking about championships.  I can’t quite put my finger on it...his career never quite felt as good to me as his numbers suggest.  Like I said, not opposed to the Panthers retiring his number, but I don’t know why I’m not much more strongly in favor of it than I am.  I guess I’d like to feel like DD56 and many others do, but for some reason I don’t.  

Luongo played 19 seasons and got to the semifinals once.  He played in the playoffs only 7 seasons.  This is going to be more normal as more teams enter the league without expanding the number of teams who make the playoffs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My feeling with Luongo is, that despite him never really accomplishing anything amazing with either FLA or VAN, he's one of the league's best goalies ever and a HOFer, so it just feels like someone has to retire his jersey. He basically bookended his career with 11 years on the Panthers, so I have no issue with them retiring his jersey for his entire body of work, not just what he did with the Panthers.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neb00rs said:

My feeling with Luongo is, that despite him never really accomplishing anything amazing with either FLA or VAN, he's one of the league's best goalies ever and a HOFer, so it just feels like someone has to retire his jersey. He basically bookended his career with 11 years on the Panthers, so I have no issue with them retiring his jersey for his entire body of work, not just what he did with the Panthers.

Funny, the last sentence pretty much sums this up for me.  Like I said, not opposed to this, but this almost feels like a Lifetime Achievement Award of sorts, more than Luongo having truly meant a ton to the Panthers and their fans.  

That being said, I’ve seen jersey retirements that were far more questionable than this one.  Ray Bourque (Avs) and Jean Ratelle (Rangers) immediately come to mind.  

I do very much like the fact that ALL of the Devils’ retired numbers are non-debatable. Hope that never changes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Colorado Rockies 1976 said:

Funny, the last sentence pretty much sums this up for me.  Like I said, not opposed to this, but this almost feels like a Lifetime Achievement Award of sorts, more than Luongo having truly meant a ton to the Panthers and their fans.  

That being said, I’ve seen jersey retirements that were far more questionable than this one.  Ray Bourque (Avs) and Jean Ratelle (Rangers) immediately come to mind.  

I do very much like the fact that ALL of the Devils’ retired numbers are non-debatable. Hope that never changes.  

If we will have not enough reasons for different commercial successes we will see some strange or/and questionable  numbers retirements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya the Luongo jersey retirement surprised me too, but honestly who else could they retire the jersey for?  It's just an excuse to get a fuller crowd in their building, at least for that one night.

Maybe we could do a Doug Gilmour jersey night too to get a full house? He played for us for a few games anyway.

Edited by Rob_Ottawa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve already posted my general feelings about Luongo, but 571 regular season games played with any given team within a goalie’s career is up there...not as much as Marty with the Devils, Lundqvist with the Rangers, or MAF with the Penguins...but more than Roy with either the Avs or Canadiens.  Yes, Luongo has two stints there, but he did spend over half of his very long career there (as far as GP goes, anyway).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So last month was the Meigray expo and former Rangers Neil Smith and Stephane Matteau were the guest speakers.  Normally we probably wouldn't care but frankly they were easily the best speakers that I have ever heard at the expo.  Both, especially Smith, were extremely frank and open.  Some neat tidbits from them:

 A) Both Neil and Stephane hated Mike Keenan.  Neil hated him more than Stephane.
B. Neil said that Keenan bugged him immediately.  He liked Roger Nielsen but the hiring for Mike was a very "win-now" decision.  He said that he felt pressure to hire a guy who went to the finals only 2 years prior to get the rangers over the hump in 93-94, especially after 92-93 disaster of a season.
C) Smith said Mike was just irritating and frustrating to deal with.  An example he gave was that they played in Europe for a couple games.  He got on the flight back home and saw Neil's lawyer and agent on the flight.  He said that's unusual to see but for Mike that's not that unusual.  He later asked in the flight where mike is and his lawyer said he went on a different flight back to Chicago to see family.  Neil was pissed because mike didn't tell him or anyone he was doing that.  He said that was Mike in a nutshell.
D) Neil said Mike didn't like Amonte and Gartner pretty much immediately.  He said he hated Gartner for a personal reason that he didn't want to disclose at the expo.  He said he just didn't like how Amonte was as a player and preferred big power forwards.  He said that starting in mid November until the trade deadline Mike would immediately ask Neil after every practice in Rye to trade Amonte for Matteau.  He literally said for Matteau straight up because he liked him in Chicago.  Neil didn't make the trade until the deadline because he needed to get more than just the straight up swap and Noonan was the throw-in the even the trade out.
E) in an answer to a question, he said he traded Zubov in 95 because of how Zubov played in the 95 playoffs.  He said that against Philly in that year he played very scared and got man-handled.  He said that he looked like he was going to crap his pants every time Lindros came near him so he traded him and Nedved (whom both himself and Colin Campbell liked) to Pittsburg for Luc and Ulf.  The main target of that trade was actually Ulf because they figured for the next few years the road to the cup meant they would have to go through Philly at some point in the playoffs so they needed toughness.
 F) Colin Campbell didn't like Matteau and neither knew for sure why.
 G) in an answer to a question, Neil smith talked about the Messier to Vancouver signing.  He said that their owner, ITT, gave cCecketts and him direct orders to not pay Messier a cent more than what Gretzky was earning.  Neil flew down to Hilton Head in the summer of 97 to meet with Messier's agent which was his father Doug.  He said when he told them the most they were going to do Doug got extremely upset and basically told him to go to hell.  Neil said to us that he wasn't too broken up when Messier left.  He said Doug was a nightmare to deal with as all hockey parents as agents were and that he felt like Messier's play was starting to slip.  He said that while Doug argued that the Rangers were Mark's team in reality he was getting old and was man-handled by the Flyers in the 97 ECF and felt like Gretzky was better.
 H) Neil told us about the process of creating the liberty head third jersey.  He said he mainly wanted something for kids as he felt the main design was too old-timey and was a design from 30's/40's.  He said he got inspired for the NYR portion partially from seeing billboards in NY with DKNY and with the Rangers referred to as NYR on out of town scoreboards.  The Liberty head came directly from Richters mask.  He said that he actually was violating league rules with the white Liberty jersey because at the time teams were only allowed to have one alternate.  He wanted to do alternating years of white and blue.  96-97 and 97-98 were blue, 98-99 was white, 99-00 was blue.  He was going to do white in 00/01 but he was canned and Sather decided to finally listen to the league.  Smith said he got away with doing the fourth jersey because he simply ignored the league when they complained.
I) he brought a never before seen prototype of a third jersey they designed for the 99-00 season that was never used.  Picture is attached.
J) Smith said that he was ordered by ownership to offer sheet Sakic as they were slightly panicked in losing messier.  Vancouver only went after messier in 97 because he lost out on Gretzky in previous years when he was available and was obsessed with getting either messier, Gretzky or both.  The signing of messier was literally just a vanity project for the owners of Vancouver.  Smith said he told owners that Colorado would match it and it was a bad idea.  The idea was that Colorado ownership was having financial difficulties and would never match it.  They did and Smith said all it did was piss off the league's GM's.
K) Smith said when he heard during the playoffs that Keenan was talking to other teams about leaving the rangers while he was in the middle of the 94 playoffs he was really happy.  He said it saved him from headaches in firing Keenan during the off-season and getting backlash from the fans.
L) Matteau said he got along with Keenan for years as a player and that's why he seemed to follow him from Chicago, to New York to St. Louis.  He said he went to Florida for same reason but when he got there he found himself often being scratched.  At one point he was scratched for 18 games in a row.  He asked mike what was up and Mike flat out asked him to retire at 33.  He said that it pissed him off and he didn't talk to him again until the recent Rangers reunion only a few months ago where they patched things up.
M) he said that he was told Smith traded for him because they needed a third line center. Rangers were mostly using Tikkanen as the center and he was a natural winger.
N) He said that in the 96 playoffs when he was in St. Louis that after a bad game Keenan pointed the finger at Gretzky in the locker room and screamed at him saying he was playing like sh!t and that he was past his glory days.  He said he never was in a room so quiet before and since then.  He said Gretzky just sat there and gave him the death stare during the tirade while Hull was in the corner not giving a sh!t.  He said Hull rarely gave a sh!t about anything.  He said that after the series ended and they were leaving the locker room mike would stand at the door high fiving every player.  When Gretzky walked past him he purposefully didn't slap mikes hand.  Gretzky was a goner from St. Louis because of Iron Mike.
O) Matteau said the year he got the cup in 94 was the last year players had the cup without the keeper being right there.  He said the reason was mostly because of him.  He said when he had his day with it up in Canada he brought it up to his hometowns local dive bar.  Him and his buddies got drunk and were holding the cup above their heads.  He said by the time he got it the cup part at top was wobbly from years of abuse. When one of his buddies held it above his head the cup part finally snapped off and they were all horrified and panicking.  One of his drunk friends was a welder and said he could fix it.  He claimed he could do it even though he most welded steal and not silver.  So in the middle of the night with no other options Matteau's welder buddy fixed the cup.  The problem is that his inexperience worn silver was evident when the weld was gigantic and really thick with the solder.  Smith was the person who got it next and he said when he opened it up he was panicking and called the league because it was a mess with the solder and it was done very sloppy from the welder being drunk.  He said the league later fixed it but now that's the season why they have a guy with the cup at all times haha.

P) Matteau said in his second game on the Rangers (which was an away game in Edmonton as his first game with the Rangers was an away game in Calgary), it was the first time he actually said anything to Messier.  He said Mark had a really bad shift and when Messier came back to the bench he said to Mark "I hope all of your shifts aren't like that because you played worse than a pee-wee player!"  He said Mark just looked at him with that stone cold death stare for a few minutes.  Matteau said he broke into laughter and Mark had a little smirk then and didn't say anything.  He said Mark was a very serious guy but a really good leader in the locker room.  He said during that 94 run he said everyone in the locker room Messier was the undisputed leader of that locker room with Leetch and Graves as leaders as well.  He said Graves, Leetch and Richter were always very nice and friendly.
Q) Smith said that Lindros and Sundin really are the two players who changed the dynamics of the game from the mid to late 90's the most.  He said every GM wanted those type of players to go up against the Sundin's and Lindros' of the league.  He said Lindros especially was the player everyone was pointing to as the future of the NHL.  He said Zubov was not the only player who would crap his pants when they saw Lindros coming near them.  Smith kept stressing that pretty much every team in the Eastern conference were building their teams to directly compete against Philly from about 1995 through 2000.
R) Matteau said on that famous goal that he wasn't actually trying to stuff it in on a wrap-around.  He was actually trying to throw it in front of the crease for Tikkanen to bury it.  He said that it was just a lucky bounce off of Marty that it went in.
S) After the offer sheet he gave to Sakic was matched, the Rangers ownership demanded that he put another offer for Paul Kariya.  The owners figured that both Kariya and the Ducks were locked in a bitter contract dispute and that they could take advantage.  Smith advised against it and won that argument.  He said he told them that if they offer sheeted Kariya that it would not only piss off the other GM's even more after Sakic, but that they are going up against Michael Eisner who was not about to let his star athlete walk. 
 
 

RangersPrototype.jpg

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always great to see a guy who lived it be so open and forthcoming about his experiences.  

And the GM club really needs to get over themselves...why have RFA at all if you’re all going to borderline collude against it?  It exists.  GMs have the right to try to go that route if they don’t mind paying the price.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.