Jump to content

Hughes vs Crosby


ajsgolf

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, thecoffeecake said:

The word "generational talent" is tossed around every single draft lately (save for 2017). McDavid, Matthews, Dahlin, Hughes. Yea, not always for defensemen, obviously, but the term "generational" is  pretty much meaningless now because of its gross overuse by media and fans. 

Yup. You aren’t “generational” when there’s multiple guys from the same generation that are also “generational”. That’s just not how it works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MB3 said:

I haven’t heard the term “generational” used by actual hockey writers to describe anyone that wasn’t Crosby, McDavid or Dahlin. 

In fact I distinctly remember people saying Auston Matthews is a franchise forward but he is NOT a generational talent. 

You’re a generational poster, IMHO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MB3 said:

You’re a generational memer. Imagine how strong NJDEVS.com is having us as a 1-2 punch down the middle?

now we really need some defense. I nominate SD, he’s always overly defensive. 

:)

 

Fixed. We’re the Nico and Hughes of this site. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, MB3 said:

You’re a generational memer. Imagine how strong NJDEVS.com will be having us as a 1-2 punch down the middle?

now we really need some defense. I nominate SD, he’s always overly defensive. 

:)

 

well as we all know defense wins championships my man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nicomo said:

He passed on the guy with injury concerns last time, wonder if Kakko was truly neck and neck with Hughes if his health issues would be enough to sway Shero towards Hughes? I honestly have no idea how many NHL players deal with diabetes, but I assume it’s pretty manageable? The cileac disease I know is not a big deal, as my mom has it. 

I dont think he passed on Nolan for injury concerns. Hischier was simply on the rise going from a late round pick to a first round pick within a few months and shero probably figured that his ceiling was higher than Nolan if his projection was right.

This is incredibly important. At that age, kids can develop and improve incredibly within a year and some take longer than others for various reasons. Sometimes they even bloom way later once in the NHL, thats why you got guys like Kucherov or Gaudreau at times considered the best players in the league and they were not even first round picks... same with Dmen... they always say it takes longer for dmen to develop... and sure enough... many of the top dmen in the league were not even first round picks... some were like doughty but some were like 2nd,3rd round picks... it's all about when they are hitting their full potential.

Thats kind of why i don't put that much into the "this player has been rated #1 for 1-2 years"... it's really not impossible that other players suddenly explose and leap over them. And also why i was at least willing to give Kakko some credits and consider him if scouts thought he could have been on the rise and a late bloomer

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MB3 said:

Our starting lineup looks pretty good. 

Nicomo-Mfitz-MB3

SD-PK Subban

Crasher

 

You son of a... 

 

Edit: well perfect timing to bring up that Subban was voted BY NHL PLAYERS the most overrated player in the league. And by quiiiiiiiiiiiiiiite a wide margin (he was 23% while the 2nd place was 9%). So there's that. https://www.tsn.ca/player-poll-subban-laine-most-overrated-1.1265431

So find me a better D partner than that will ya. 

Edited by SterioDesign
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, MB3 said:

I haven’t heard the term “generational” used by actual hockey writers to describe anyone that wasn’t Crosby, McDavid or Dahlin. 

In fact I distinctly remember people saying Auston Matthews is a franchise forward but he is NOT a generational talent. 

Pierre on Matthews:

https://www.tsn.ca/radio/toronto-1050/mcguire-matthews-is-a-generational-player-1.575366

Medium on Matthews:

https://medium.com/@hockeypromagazine/so-auston-matthews-is-clearly-better-than-jack-eichel-2fd4469a2be5

SI on Hughes:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.si.com/nhl/2019/03/22/nhl-draft-lottery-jack-hughes-rangers-avalanche-kings-ducks-devils-red-wings

There's plenty. I can't do this all day. Saw articles debating the generational tag for Larkin and Svechnikov. You're gonna say it's not thrown around often? It's become synonymous with "really good".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thecoffeecake said:

Pierre on Matthews:

https://www.tsn.ca/radio/toronto-1050/mcguire-matthews-is-a-generational-player-1.575366

Medium on Matthews:

https://medium.com/@hockeypromagazine/so-auston-matthews-is-clearly-better-than-jack-eichel-2fd4469a2be5

SI on Hughes:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.si.com/nhl/2019/03/22/nhl-draft-lottery-jack-hughes-rangers-avalanche-kings-ducks-devils-red-wings

There's plenty. I can't do this all day. Saw articles debating the generational tag for Larkin and Svechnikov. You're gonna say it's not thrown around often? It's become synonymous with "really good".

It’s the most over and mis-used word on the planet and I wish people would just stop saying it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thecoffeecake said:

Pierre on Matthews:

https://www.tsn.ca/radio/toronto-1050/mcguire-matthews-is-a-generational-player-1.575366

Medium on Matthews:

https://medium.com/@hockeypromagazine/so-auston-matthews-is-clearly-better-than-jack-eichel-2fd4469a2be5

SI on Hughes:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.si.com/nhl/2019/03/22/nhl-draft-lottery-jack-hughes-rangers-avalanche-kings-ducks-devils-red-wings

There's plenty. I can't do this all day. Saw articles debating the generational tag for Larkin and Svechnikov. You're gonna say it's not thrown around often? It's become synonymous with "really good".

I’d like to see anything in writing where it was argued that someone who wasn’t on central scouting’s top ten North American skaters (Larkin)  being “generational.”

To my knowledge, the first time it got used in any sport was with McDavid.  I don’t even remember the term being used for Lebron.  It seems to have caught on in other sports since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/12/2019 at 11:36 PM, Daniel said:

I’d like to see anything in writing where it was argued that someone who wasn’t on central scouting’s top ten North American skaters (Larkin)  being “generational.”

To my knowledge, the first time it got used in any sport was with McDavid.  I don’t even remember the term being used for Lebron.  It seems to have caught on in other sports since then.

It wasn't when he was a prospect, it was written by some Detroit area paper since he's been in the league. 

My point is that it's horribly overused. If you hear it more than once in a generation, it's not being used properly. 

To some extent, i get it. Players are better than ever, and scouts are seeing guys with tools that you almost never saw ten or fifteen years ago almost every draft. Ii'm sure the knee jerk reaction to long time scouts seeing these guys is that they're generational, which they all would've been in the year 2000.

Now kind of unrelated, I wonder how jack's scouting would've gone back then. Does anyone have the balls to draft someone of his size first overall 20 years ago? I doubt it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SterioDesign said:

i cannot overstate how i really think that we should get Elias to spend some time with Hughes for a bit during the summer. 

That kid is a sponge and Elias is like..... Liquid Nutella. 

I would say "water" might have been a netter reference, but I am sure its your second favorite thing to be absorbed by a sponge which is why it got ignored. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, SterioDesign said:

well i know. That's what i said too. 

I figured when i say something you don't agree with that you often  just don't get it so i'll take another approach and just say the things you say? 

I got it, it was just stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SterioDesign said:

Basically Hughes is not Crosby level and it's unlikely that he gets to that level. That's about it

Exactly. Three pages to figure out what we knew even before this thread was created. What a bunch of bored Devils fans can do in an exciting off season.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.