Jump to content

GDT: Devils at Flames 9:00 PM


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 227
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

So tonight: Bad penalties. Both taken and phantoms called by the refs Horrendous second period and zero adjustments by the coaches during the third. Who’s our next 7th defender? Because

The answer was “exactly the wrong amount”. 

The two arrows on the right just merely indicate who both guys were responsible for picking up (I thought that much was obvious), the back two arrows of show, ideally, where they should have headed (T

Posted Images

Just now, NJDevils1214 said:

Looked to me like Coleman was turning and tried to avoid whatever flame was in his face. It looked more like incidental contact caused by not having eyes in the back of your head than an interference penalty. 

That’s just not what happened. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NJDevils1214 said:

Looked to me like Coleman was turning and tried to avoid whatever flame was in his face. It looked more like incidental contact caused by not having eyes in the back of your head than an interference penalty. 

Can’t even give him the benefit of the doubt though because of his history of taking stupid bonehead penalties in the offensive zone

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MB3 said:

That’s just not what happened. 

He kicked the guy’s foot out from under him. It was a penalty. And not a good one. 

Just now, pumpkin cutter said:

good news is that we can't blow a 3rd period lead. 

Not yet anyway...

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MB3 said:

That’s just not what happened. 

 

2 minutes ago, devlman said:

Can’t even give him the benefit of the doubt though because of his history of taking stupid bonehead penalties in the offensive zone

I rewind it. Coleman made contact with 2 people on that play, the penalty was called for the contact with the first player, not the second one. I didn't see the contact with the first guy. It was a penalty. The second contact I described did happen, it just wasn't want the penalty was called on.

EDIT: Contact with Flame #88 PENALTY - Contact with Flame #5 NOT A PENALTY. I only saw the contact with Flame #5.

Edited by NJDevils1214
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NJDevils1214 said:

 

I rewind it. Coleman made contact with 2 people on that play, the penalty was called for the contact with the first player, not the second one. I didn't see the contact with the first guy. It was a penalty. The second contact I described did happen, it just wasn't want the penalty was called on.

Yea. The initial contact was Coleman fvcking checking someone without the puck. It was a stupid penalty and if Pavel Zacha made that play he sits on the bench for the entire third period.

2 minutes ago, Devils01 said:

Hall thank you for fvcking up our lead and for a chance to go on a 3 game winning streak. This ones on you buddy

lol, wut 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.