Jump to content

Coleman to the Bolts


jagknife

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mfitz804 said:

I’m more annoyed by the people who insist it was a coaching issue, like they were told to only take sh!tty shots from outside the slot, not that the Blues just absolutely sh!t them down. 

Getting shutout happens, but what about giving up nearly 40 shots two nights after giving up 55? Isn’t Nas a defensive minded coach? 

Yes, some of it is the players (no Vats, no Greene), but ffs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't even want to think about what's left if they move Vats.  Seriously and all kidding aside there isn't one guy I would like left back there. That's not something they're going to be able to turn around quickly either.  Soooooooo many holes in this roster after all these years of futility is really hard to be optimistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Nicomo said:

Getting shutout happens, but what about giving up nearly 40 shots two nights after giving up 55? Isn’t Nas a defensive minded coach? 

Yes, some of it is the players (no Vats, no Greene), but ffs...

I can guarantee no NHL coach’s concept is to let the other team take as many shots as possible and let the goalie bail you out lol. 

Our defense is sh!t, and without Vatanen and Greene, it’s diarrhea. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mfitz804 said:

I can guarantee no NHL coach’s concept is to let the other team take as many shots as possible and let the goalie bail you out lol. 

Our defense is sh!t, and without Vatanen and Greene, it’s diarrhea. 

Well ofc not, but his job as coach is to address such things. They are obviously not going to look like the early 00’s Devils, but they also shouldn’t be giving up almost 100 shots in two games. Regardless of who is playing. It’s inexcusable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Nicomo said:

Well ofc not, but his job as coach is to address such things. They are obviously not going to look like the early 00’s Devils, but they also shouldn’t be giving up almost 100 shots in two games. Regardless of who is playing. It’s inexcusable. 

Right. But my point is, there’s no possible way it wasn’t addressed. It just wasn’t executed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, mfitz804 said:

Right. But my point is, there’s no possible way it wasn’t addressed. It just wasn’t executed. 

A coach is also responsible for effectively training execution. The blame can go all the way around to everyone in this organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, mfitz804 said:

Right. But my point is, there’s no possible way it wasn’t addressed. It just wasn’t executed. 

That’s assuming he’s actually effective at addressing the problem, and implementing the right changes. I’m sure it’s a bit of both (bad players and poor coaching). 

And it’s been going on even before Greene left. Blackwood had a 46 save shutout a couple weeks ago. 

Whatever they’re doing, it ain’t working...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nessus said:

Does anyone know if Dhaliwal is legit? It would be insane of Vancouver to do that.

I mean he works for TSN Radio in Vancouver, he must have connections or something. TSN dudes are usually legit in some sort, don't think TSN would accept them just spewing fake stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Devs3cups said:

I'd definitely take Woo and Baertschi for Simmonds. Hell, I'd definitely take Juolevi (who Vancouver fans seem to be souring on for some reason). Seems like a steal for us.

Friedman mentioned Juolevi tonight as a possibility in a deal for Simmonds.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Devs3cups said:

I'd definitely take Woo and Baertschi for Simmonds. Hell, I'd definitely take Juolevi (who Vancouver fans seem to be souring on for some reason). Seems like a steal for us.

For him injuries has been a problem so far so thats why. But i mean... for Simmonds it's a good gamble i feel

pretty easy to find articles describing what he went through so far

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SterioDesign said:

For him injuries has been a problem so far so thats why. But i mean... for Simmonds it's a good gamble i feel

pretty easy to find articles describing what he went through so far

Yup definitely, injuries are a problem with him. But he's on pace for a 42 point season as a 21 yo defenseman in the AHL, which is pretty darn solid. I'd definitely take a gamble with him. Maybe he needs a change of scenery and a good opportunity to play consistently in the big league? He'd definitely get that here. Defensemen take longer to develop so I wouldn't be worried about acquiring him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Daniel said:

Brotherhood was the motorcycle gang in Another 48 Hours

Oh..........I literally just watched 48 Hrs the other night.   Such a classic.  And during it I see Kehoe during it and I started chuckling because how dumb that one was. 

To each their own

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.