Jump to content

GDT: Two bad teams compete to see who isn't the worst (NJD Vs BUF)


Chimaira_Devil_#9

Recommended Posts

What in the flying fvck was Severson doing right there?

Just now, Devs3cups said:

It's a follow through from a shot/pass. Even though it sucks, that's not a penalty.

It’s absolutely a penalty. You have to control your stick no matter what. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nicomo said:

What in the flying fvck was Severson doing right there?

It’s absolutely a penalty. You have to control your stick no matter what. 

Actually, it isn't. When it is a shot or pass follow through that results in a high stick, it's not a penalty.

60.1 High-sticking - A “high stick” is one which is carried above the height of the opponent’s shoulders. Players and goalkeepers must be in control and responsible for their stick. However, a player is permitted accidental contact on an opponent if the act is committed as a normal windup or follow through of a shooting motion. A wild swing at a bouncing puck would not be considered a normal windup or follow through and any contact to an opponent above the height of the shoulders shall be penalized accordingly.

Edited by Devs3cups
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Devs3cups said:

It's a follow through from a shot/pass. Even though it sucks, that's not a penalty.

I could be wrong, but I believe it is a penalty - I'm pretty sure the rule is you have to be "in control of your stick", whether it's skating around the ice without the puck, or even the follow-through from a shot.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, 4 goals allowed on 17 shots isn't gonna cut it. 

Goals 2 and 4 were pretty avoidable. 2 mistakes by Zajac imo. The Dahlin goal Merkley got owned. 

Other than that, I though the Bratt/Zacha/Wood line played really well, as well as the Kuok/Hughes/Sharangovich line. 

On to the next one. 

Edited by Devs3cups
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Devs3cups said:

Actually, it isn't. When it is a shot or pass follow through that results in a high stick, it's not a penalty.

60.1 High-sticking - A “high stick” is one which is carried above the height of the opponent’s shoulders. Players and goalkeepers must be in control and responsible for their stick. However, a player is permitted accidental contact on an opponent if the act is committed as a normal windup or follow through of a shooting motion. A wild swing at a bouncing puck would not be considered a normal windup or follow through and any contact to an opponent above the height of the shoulders shall be penalized accordingly.

I feel like I’ve seen that exact call made on follow throughs. There’s way too much grey area that the way its written. So it’s basically up to the official on the ice. Stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NJDfan1711 said:

I could be wrong, but I believe it is a penalty - I'm pretty sure the rule is you have to be "in control of your stick", whether it's skating around the ice without the puck, or even the follow-through from a shot.  

60.1 High-sticking - A “high stick” is one which is carried above the height of the opponent’s shoulders. Players and goalkeepers must be in control and responsible for their stick. However, a player is permitted accidental contact on an opponent if the act is committed as a normal windup or follow through of a shooting motion. A wild swing at a bouncing puck would not be considered a normal windup or follow through and any contact to an opponent above the height of the shoulders shall be penalized accordingly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NJDfan1711 said:

I could be wrong, but I believe it is a penalty - I'm pretty sure the rule is you have to be "in control of your stick", whether it's skating around the ice without the puck, or even the follow-through from a shot.  

You are wrong. See the rule above. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Devs3cups said:

Actually, it isn't. When it is a shot or pass follow through that results in a high stick, it's not a penalty.

60.1 High-sticking - A “high stick” is one which is carried above the height of the opponent’s shoulders. Players and goalkeepers must be in control and responsible for their stick. However, a player is permitted accidental contact on an opponent if the act is committed as a normal windup or follow through of a shooting motion. A wild swing at a bouncing puck would not be considered a normal windup or follow through and any contact to an opponent above the height of the shoulders shall be penalized accordingly.

Wasn't the Buffalo player attempting to rifle the puck out of the zone?  I thought he was behind his own net, so essentially that wouldn't (or shouldn't) be considered a shot or a follow-through from a shot on goal.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nicomo said:

I feel like I’ve seen that exact call made on follow throughs. There’s way too much grey area that the way its written. So it’s basically up to the official on the ice. Stupid.

It happens sometimes. On the case here, you can clearly see the referee signaling that it was a follow through right after the play happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NJDfan1711 said:

Wasn't the Buffalo player attempting to rifle the puck out of the zone?  I thought he was behind his own net, so essentially that wouldn't (or shouldn't) be considered a shot or a follow-through from a shot on goal.  

Whether it's a shot on goal or not doesn't matter. "if the act is committed as a normal windup or follow through of a shooting motion".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thompson comes in and skates like he’s shot out of a cannon. Take fvcking notes. 
 

THIS TEAM CONTINUES TO HAVE ZERO IDENTITY. 
 

Wedgewood stinks the second goal was a joke. 
 

If you’re sitting here mad at the refs, you’re missing the point. The forecheck is nonexistent. Players take angles and rotations that would get you sat in a jv game. We can’t complete a 10 ft breakout pass. Wedgewood is sliding wide of a soccer net on goal 2. 
 

Time to stop with the friendly grandpa sh!t Lindy and get after this team. No accountability. You’re either coaching it, or allowing it to happen. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.