Jump to content

The 2021 Offseason Thread


jagknife

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, devlman said:

Man, Sakic has gone from king of the GMs to looking really bad this off-season - The mess with Landeskog, losing their starting goalie, trading away a first and Timmins for the very average Kuemper, and now losing Saad. 

Over the past few seasons, Kuemper has been pretty good. Definitely above average

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SterioDesign said:

 

#caphellisonlyamyth

I think you don't see a difference between a salary cap and "salary cap hell". Nobody is in "hell" over losing Brandon Saad. Does the cap prevent a team from having every player they want? Sure. 

Does not being able to sign Saad because you have MacKinnon, Landeskog, Rantanen, Makar and Maltsev count as "hell"? I think not. 

 

Edit: Yes, I put Maltsev in there for comedy. 

Edited by mfitz804
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nicomo said:

Eh, not the strongest example of a core player really considering he’s 36 years old. 

Yeah but its also not the strongest logic that you can only prove cap hell exist if you lose a young core player. That's a very flawed way to look at it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mfitz804 said:

I think you don't see a difference between a salary cap and "salary cap hell". Nobody is in "hell" over losing Brandon Saad. Does the cap prevent a team from having every player they want? Sure. 

Does not being able to sign Saad because you have MacKinnon, Landeskog, Rantanen, Makar and Maltsev count as "hell"? I think not. 

 

Edit: Yes, I put Maltsev in there for comedy. 

i know the difference. And i can see this conversations turning into nitpicking semantics as if it's actually disproving anything. A cap hell scenario exist and has been used by analyst and in sports community for awhile. To deny it cause it doesn't fit your own narrow view of it doesn't prove anything.

It can be that you have many veterans way past their prime not contributing anymore and you can't move them. So you can't get good depth enough to compensate and can't spend more on other things. There's many scenarios.

its used in all sports, why are we denying it? lol

 1427267731_ScreenShot2021-07-29at12_16_24PM.thumb.png.acf4b8b5206e5f2a1306e9a9cdc161e7.png

Edited by SterioDesign
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the Zajac thing... A few of the trackers say the Devils signed Brian Flynn, former Canadien and Sabre. He was playing in the National League in Switzerland last year. Most likely a Utica guy who may try to push for the 4th line. 

We also signed Chase De Leon who was a point per game player in the AHL for the Gulls but can't seem to make it work in the NHL. 

Both are centers so I wonder if the team is looking to use McLeod on the 3rd line and see if one of these guys fits on the 4th. 

I'd prefer they keep Zacha on the wing. He just does better there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Devil Dan 56 said:

On the Zajac thing... A few of the trackers say the Devils signed Brian Flynn, former Canadien and Sabre. He was playing in the National League in Switzerland last year. Most likely a Utica guy who may try to push for the 4th line. 

We also signed Chase De Leon who was a point per game player in the AHL for the Gulls but can't seem to make it work in the NHL. 

Both are centers so I wonder if the team is looking to use McLeod on the 3rd line and see if one of these guys fits on the 4th. 

I'd prefer they keep Zacha on the wing. He just does better there. 

id also want to land a 3rd line center so that mcleod stays on the 4th and doesnt do more than he should. unless he really deserve the 3rd line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Devil Dan 56 said:

On the Zajac thing... A few of the trackers say the Devils signed Brian Flynn, former Canadien and Sabre. He was playing in the National League in Switzerland last year. Most likely a Utica guy who may try to push for the 4th line. 

We also signed Chase De Leon who was a point per game player in the AHL for the Gulls but can't seem to make it work in the NHL. 

Both are centers so I wonder if the team is looking to use McLeod on the 3rd line and see if one of these guys fits on the 4th. 

I'd prefer they keep Zacha on the wing. He just does better there. 

I’d imagine Boqvist will get a shot before either of those guys. It took McLeod until he was the age Boqvist is now to really look like an NHL player so who knows. I’m not giving up on him yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nicomo said:

I’d imagine Boqvist will get a shot before either of those guys. It took McLeod until he was the age Boqvist is now to really look like an NHL player so who knows. I’m not giving up on him yet. 

I was thinking of other centers and totally forgot Boqvist. It would be really great for him to make a jump this year like McLeod did last year 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Devil Dan 56 said:

I was thinking of other centers and totally forgot Boqvist. It would be really great for him to make a jump this year like McLeod did last year 

 

Boqvist and Siegenthaler coming out with huge years would be huge for us. I feel like both are seen like "okay guys filling the gap for now" but if they could become something, we'd be talkin'

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, SterioDesign said:

i know the difference. And i can see this conversations turning into nitpicking semantics as if it's actually disproving anything. A cap hell scenario exist and has been used by analyst and in sports community for awhile. To deny it cause it doesn't fit your own narrow view of it doesn't prove anything.

It can be that you have many veterans way past their prime not contributing anymore and you can't move them. So you can't get good depth enough to compensate and can't spend more on other things. There's many scenarios.

its used in all sports, why are we denying it? lol

 1427267731_ScreenShot2021-07-29at12_16_24PM.thumb.png.acf4b8b5206e5f2a1306e9a9cdc161e7.png

I don't agree at all, not being able to spend on other things is not cap hell, that's just a salary cap. If you had to lose a core player, like if they had to choose between Makar, MacKinnon, Rantanen and Landeskog, sure, that's cap hell.

Losing any player at all because you are at the cap is not the same thing that anyone (other than you) is talking about. It's been made clear that those of us who say it doesn't exist feel teams don't lose their core pieces due to salary cap and moves are always made to preserve the core, and you keep trying to roll out examples that just don't fit the bill. 

34 minutes ago, Nicomo said:

I’d imagine Boqvist will get a shot before either of those guys. It took McLeod until he was the age Boqvist is now to really look like an NHL player so who knows. I’m not giving up on him yet. 

This is the only reason I am not on the Boqvist Sucks train already. But let's just say I have bought my ticket and I am waiting on the platform lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mfitz804 said:

This is what I’m saying, that’s not “cap hell”, that’s just “cap”. 

It's working with the cap.  Cap Hell is when you have to part with a core piece to stay under the cap.  For Colorado that would be someone like MacK, Rantanen, Makar, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Devil Dan 56 said:

Lets just all agree to call it cap heck. 

It’s like wanting to buy Michael J. Fox’s purple underwear from Back To The Future, but you can’t because you spent all of your money buying his auto-lacing sneakers and a full scale DeLorean. You missed out on the underpants but you still have way cooler stuff in your collection, so maybe you don’t need the place where his balls were resting. 

  • Shocking 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nicomo said:

I’d imagine Boqvist will get a shot before either of those guys. It took McLeod until he was the age Boqvist is now to really look like an NHL player so who knows. I’m not giving up on him yet. 

Absolutely. Boqvist looked like he was figuring it out second half of last season. He can absolutely be an effective piece this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, devlman said:

Absolutely. Boqvist looked like he was figuring it out second half of last season. He can absolutely be an effective piece this season.

I think that plus McLeod keeping pasce or improving would be the two things I want to see out of our bottom 6 as currently situated. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MB3 said:

you're really, really good at being really, really, really dumb.

that's "can't fit him under the cap". it's not "we cannot afford to re-sign our best players"

I wouldn't call him dumb, personally, but that's exactly the distinction that I mentioned he doesn't understand, that he insisted he does understand.

Suffice to say, he does not define "cap hell" the same way we do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Satans Hockey said:

As said a couple pages back I also fall into move on from Zajac camp. We'll have plenty of new guys and the younger guys stepping up to make this team their own. No more retreads. 

Let’s also point out that I’m not sure Zajac is even looking to come back. He implied that part of why he left is because the team got so young and he is old and he felt out of place. I don’t think he would be looking to put himself back into that situation. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mfitz804 said:

Let’s also point out that I’m not sure Zajac is even looking to come back. He implied that part of why he left is because the team got so young and he is old and he felt out of place. I don’t think he would be looking to put himself back into that situation. 

There is also the possibility that he is considering retirement. He doesn't seem interested in being away from family or uprooting family. It wouldn't shock me to see him an office job with either us or the Isles. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Devil Dan 56 said:

There is also the possibility that he is considering retirement. He doesn't seem interested in being away from family or uprooting family. It wouldn't shock me to see him an office job with either us or the Isles. 

Valid point as well. Having had to struggle to get in the lineup with the Isles, he may not want to deal with that again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.