Jump to content

Who do you want at #4OA? *It's Luke! *


Nicomo
 Share

Who do you want at #4?  

50 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you want at #4?

    • Luke Hughes
    • Brandt Clarke
    • William Eklund
    • Matthew Beniers
    • Simon Edvinsson
      0
    • Other
      0


Recommended Posts

Just now, Nicomo said:

Yeah, I kind of sh!t on the Mercer pick last year in the live draft thread (tbf I was drinking lol), and now I’m higher on him than Holtz. I know nothing about Stillman, so I’ll reserve judgment. I would have been excited about Raty though. 

Yeah i was high on Mercer having seen him play live and scoring a big goal for canada. im also way higher on him than holtz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 867
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

3 minutes ago, SterioDesign said:

How is this not what NJ need?

You were literally getting all upset like YESTERDAY cursing the management because we traded / lost 2 right wingers saying we needed RW and that we needed grit and develop them cause it's the best an cheaper way. This is precisely what this dude is, he's a gritty RW ? lol How are you not happy?

Do I really have to explain this, or are you just kidding me now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MB3 said:

Devils don’t really have room for high-skill no-defense playmaker type forwards. I would’ve liked them to trade back but maybe they didn’t have a deal they liked where they could ensure they drafted Stillman.

He sounds like a perfect middle/bottom-6 forward. High energy, solid defense, likes to use his body, can still put the puck in the net. 

Sounds like Mercer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did some reading. The kid seems to be exactly what I love to hear; an absolute fvcking a$$hole on the ice. A total pest, obnoxious to play against, energizer bunny, sneaky talent. Saw someone on reddit say Brendan Gallagher type, which fits. 

I refuse to get frazzled about late round picks. It’s such a goddamned crapshoot anyway, and this guy’s seemingly got a solidly high floor. The devils liked him, so I’m good with it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/23/2021 at 11:39 PM, Jimmy Leeds said:

Sounds like Mercer!

The difference here would be that Merkley has no appreciable hockey talent.

Edited by MB3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MadDog2020 said:

Holy sh!t is that the kid who asked to not be drafted?! 

Yep, the same. 

Just now, MadDog2020 said:

Is Montreal nuts?!

It appears so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SterioDesign said:

Yeah you do cause i'm not the only person who didn't understand what you were trying to say

Growing and intelligently disposing of role players and choosing them in the first round of the draft are different things.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Guadana said:

Do I really have to explain this, or are you just kidding me now?

man i love your posts lately but acting like you’re the singular authority on what is good and bad for the Devils and scoffing at other members when questioned is an ugly look for you little man 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MB3 said:

Did some reading. The kid seems to be exactly what I love to hear; an absolute fvcking a$$hole on the ice. A total pest, obnoxious to play against, energizer bunny, sneaky talent. Saw someone on reddit say Brendan Gallagher type, which fits. 

I refuse to get frazzled about late round picks. It’s such a goddamned crapshoot anyway, and this guy’s seemingly got a solidly high floor. The devils liked him, so I’m good with it. 

Cool so an a$$hole when he gains 30 lbs and maybe can stand up to Tom Wilson’s broken corpse (by then)

sorry, I’m not attacking you, i’m lashing out at the so obvious reach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Guadana said:

We have an option Attu Raty - he was numbder one year ago and was struggle with covid season in adult league. But he was pretty bright on the ice. 

this is... not what devils need. They draft third liner who will develop 4-5 years. For what? We may trade pick with columbus for 2 picks in second round. 

dam. I dont like it.

This is basically how I feel about this one. I felt there were some much better choices here. To me, this is a bigger reach than Mukhamadullin. If they weren't interested in Raty, why not Pinelli?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Guadana said:

Growing and intelligently disposing of role players and choosing them in the first round of the draft are different things.

 

I mean, they took him at 29. Bastian was 41, is it really that big of a difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.