Jump to content

2021-2022 Around the League thread


MadDog2020
 Share

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, MB3 said:

how fvcking hard is it to just, like, watch some porn or go to a stripclub if you’re that much of a horny disgusting old man? 

“you’re wise beyond your years”, if that phrase ever gets texted it should immediately send a swat team to the texter’s door. vile.

You forgot the part where he has tons of money and, in his mind, should be able to have whatever he wants whenever he wants. 

I promise you guys when I’m a billionaire I will be the type that buys weird sh!t like a T-Rex skull instead of what this d!ckhead was up to. 

EDIT: To be clear, I have a very definite order of priority should I become a billionaire:

1) House and contents (and staff to maintain)

2) Take care of family members. 

3) Season Tickets

4) A fvcking T-Rex skull. 

Edited by mfitz804
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, mfitz804 said:

You forgot the part where he has tons of money and, in his mind, should be able to have whatever he wants whenever he wants. 

I promise you guys when I’m a billionaire I will be the type that buys weird sh!t like a T-Rex skull instead of what this d!ckhead was up to. 

EDIT: To be clear, I have a very definite order of priority should I become a billionaire:

1) House and contents (and staff to maintain)

2) Take care of family members. 

3) Season Tickets

4) A fvcking T-Rex skull. 

May I suggest an NJDevs suite at the Rock?  I'll sneak in jame-o shooters.  I have a whole system down.  Basically you just put them in your pockets because the security is more lax than Ovechkin's defensive game.

A5Gzw2u.gif?w=607&ssl=1

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Crisis said:

May I suggest an NJDevs suite at the Rock?  

Yup, that works. But anyone attending has to sign a disclaimer that they can't sue me over any weiner jokes I may tell. You assume that risk walking into my suite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mfitz804 said:

Yup, that works. But anyone attending has to sign a disclaimer that they can't sue me over any weiner jokes I may tell. You assume that risk walking into my suite. 

I'd be more upset if you weren't able to rise to the occasion and slide a few in.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Muevelos said:

Sad day for for Blue Jackets fan base. They traded ar Bjork for basically nothing to Seattle for salary purposes. Believe he was a fan favorite 

fvck em. Enjoy wasting Johnny Hockey, and good luck keeping Laine interested for the duration of that contract. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol a good buddy of mine who lives in Vancouver video called me like an hour ago cause we're working on a movie together. He's been insanely busy lately so we were just catching up. He's a Canucks fan so he hates the Flames.

So it went like...

ME: So... i assume you're enjoying the Flames....going down in flames at the moment lol

HIM: What do you mean?

ME: Well Gaudreau, etc

HIM: What happened to Gaudreau?

ME: ...... Are you kidding me? You've been this out of the loop and living under a rock or something?

HIM: Yeah man. It's been insane. So what's up with Gaudreau?

ME: Omg...... okay well.... Last week he told the Flames he was not re-signing with them and signed in Colombus.

HIM: WHAT!?! HAHAHAHA HOLY fvck. fvck yeah!

ME: Well wait... There's more.....

 

hahaha you can imagine how the rest went... 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SterioDesign said:

lol a good buddy of mine who lives in Vancouver video called me like an hour ago cause we're working on a movie together. He's been insanely busy lately so we were just catching up. He's a Canucks fan so he hates the Flames.

So it went like...

ME: So... i assume you're enjoying the Flames....going down in flames at the moment lol

HIM: What do you mean?

ME: Well Gaudreau, etc

HIM: What happened to Gaudreau?

ME: ...... Are you kidding me? You've been this out of the loop and living under a rock or something?

HIM: Yeah man. It's been insane. So what's up with Gaudreau?

ME: Omg...... okay well.... Last week he told the Flames he was not re-signing with them and signed in Colombus.

HIM: WHAT!?! HAHAHAHA HOLY fvck. fvck yeah!

ME: Well wait... There's more.....

 

hahaha you can imagine how the rest went... 

 

 

Did you send him the Sad Dome pic? 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So apparently another incident involving a Canada world junior team in 03 and also apparently filmed as well... 

https://www.tsn.ca/sexual-assault-allegations-2003-world-juniors-team-1.1828253

Some big names on that team and guys who had some long NHL careers and some former sh!tty Devils as well... 

Marc-Andre Fleury

P.A. Parenteau 

Brooks Laich

Carlo Colaiacovo

Scottie Upshall

Pierre-Marc Bouchard

Kyle Wellwood

Joffery Lupul

Jay McClement

Derek Roy

Jordin Tootoo

Matthew Stajan

Gregory Campbell(Colin Campbell's kid) 

Steve Eminger

Boyd Gordon

 

Edited by Satans Hockey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well this is interesting.

Especially the extension talks... i wonder if it means they had talks, got a feel of what he wanted and was supposed to resume and he was expecting to hear back or if it didn't happen at all? I can't imagine that it didn't happen at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MB3 said:

Like, if he's front and center on video he can just be like "ahhh. must've been hammered, like I said in my statement." 

He can say it, probably not a successful defense, but he could say it. 

You’re correct to be iffy on his statement, it definitely seems intentionally vague, especially after having written about group sex encounters in his book. Of course that doesn’t mean he knew about THIS incident, and there is such a thing as consensual group sex. 

But given the incident that’s been described, “you know I’m an alcoholic and I can’t remember” when you wrote a book and described similar sexual encounters that you obviously do remember (which he believes were consensual, I assume, or he wouldn’t have written about them), is not the best look. 

If he were accused, the prosecutor would have a field day reading quotes from the book and challenging him on the whole alcoholism/lack of memory thing. 

Edited by mfitz804
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This case is slightly different than the 2018 one from what i could gather.

the 2003 one.. there's a video of about half a dozen taking turns banging a girl that appeared to be unresponsive (so basically non-consensual) and the 2018 one a girl got banged by a bunch of dudes and is recorded on video saying she was totally fine with it, totally sober, saying it was consensual and enjoying herself. But the next day saying she was hammered and felt threatened or wtv. 

One is a clear black and white no-no and the other one well it's a... well who do you believe? hopefully the investigations will shine a light on all this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, RunninWithTheDevil said:

Can we avoid referring to a violent group rape as "banging a girl" Jesus fvcking Christ 

 

28 minutes ago, MB3 said:

I believe the woman because I have no reason not to believe the woman. 

All consent isn’t equal. 

You called gang-rape “Banged by a bunch of dudes”.

Jesus.

I'm choosing to use presumption of innocence as a safe route when things are still under investigations since it's a basic legal principle that every person accused of any crime is considered innocent until proven guilty and at the moment there's conflicting reports at the moment. She's straight up on video claiming she's totally fine with it and that the guys are paranoid. Then she wasn't okay with it the next day or later that night. We don't know the exact timeline. Was that video taken earlier in the evening and the incident happened later that night? We don't fvcking know. There's a reason it's still under investigation.

Plus It doesn't matter what I or you think happened. What's important is what actually happened and hopefully the investigation will shine a light on that and if it was indeed rape i hope those guys all the pay the price for it. Obviously.

So you guys can go around claiming you know what happened and feel good about your "blindly believe all victims" and ignore that false claims also does happen and there's victims of that too. See fvcking Brian Banks, see Patty Kane. Choosing to ignore that as an option is just as dumb and ignorant.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, MB3 said:

I believe the woman because I have no reason not to believe the woman. 

All consent isn’t equal. 

You called gang-rape “Banged by a bunch of dudes”.

Jesus.

Personally I won’t be bold enough to give any opinion, because who the fvck knows. But his position and your position are equally dangerous because they are both based on almost zero knowledge of the evidence. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, mfitz804 said:

Personally I won’t be bold enough to give any opinion, because who the fvck knows. But his position and your position are equally dangerous because they are both based on almost zero knowledge of the evidence. 

Well to be clear, my "position" is based on the basic legal principle that our legal system is based on. and not on my personal opinion. Plus i 100% specified all this and that there's conflicting reports at the moment and that everything is possible

Edited by SterioDesign
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.