Jump to content

Devils Trade for John Marino, ty Smith to Pitts.


jagknife

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Guadana said:

If Buffalo really wants Severson and we are talking about NHL  player, Fits should ask Tuch. If they don’t want to trade him, than Peterka, but Fitz should be proactive to trade for Tuch. 

Necas from Carolina is a real target for trade. Mobile big defensive forward with offensive upside. They have players to replace him and have some troubles with agreement.

I would love Tuch. I think he was the biggest part coming back in the Eichel trade besides that 1st rounder that I think turned into Ostland, who looks like might be a stud. Maybe we circle back with Buffalo around the deadline and float the idea of Seves for Tuch straight up. 

Edited by RizzMB30
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, MB3 said:

you guys are legitimately outrageous with these trades lmao. Alex Tuch is a 26 year old top-6 right wing with 4 years left on a reasonable contract. Why would a rebuilding team like buffalo trade him for a rental defenseman? 

He's also like the biggest Sabres fan in the world.  He escorted Rick Jeanneret to the ice when he retired and I think I remember hearing that he bought like 2 sections worth of tickets for friends and family during his first game in Buffalo when he played for Vegas.

Not that being a fan is a NTC or anything, but on top of what MB3 said, the guy just bleeds Buffalo.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/17/2022 at 12:34 AM, Brewskies said:

We still have Blackwood as goaltender. Fitz has done a good job with the defense this offseason. I am not convinced the offense is a playoff contender. 

More to come? C'mon Fitz 

I’m not concerned with the offense.  I think the issue is still at goal.  

Edited by Puckbuster
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Puckbuster said:

I’m not concerned with the offense.  I think the issue is still at goal.  

They’re both an issue. We can’t start out the way we did last year and expect success. I think we had the lowest goals for through the first 35 games, and it was well below what the bottom team had at the end of the year. 

I don’t know what the goalies will do. If they are weak, we need the offense to be stronger to offset it. We need our second half offense from the start. 

If the goalies are like last year, it won’t make a difference. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, mfitz804 said:

They’re both an issue. We can’t start out the way we did last year and expect success. I think we had the lowest goals for through the first 35 games, and it was well below what the bottom team had at the end of the year. 

I don’t know what the goalies will do. If they are weak, we need the offense to be stronger to offset it. We need our second half offense from the start. 

If the goalies are like last year, it won’t make a difference. 

Whatever defensive system they use could be huge. A system (and players) that can regularly get the puck out of dangerous areas and transition to offense means less pressure on the goaltending and theoretically more time on offense. It’s going to come down to personnel as well which I think is improved. The right side looks great, left is Seigs, Graves and Brendan Smith and I doing know how he compares to Ty. Of course a major issue will be depth. A few injuries on defense and it gets ugly 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Devil Dan 56 said:

Whatever defensive system they use could be huge. A system (and players) that can regularly get the puck out of dangerous areas and transition to offense means less pressure on the goaltending and theoretically more time on offense. It’s going to come down to personnel as well which I think is improved. The right side looks great, left is Seigs, Graves and Brendan Smith and I doing know how he compares to Ty. Of course a major issue will be depth. A few injuries on defense and it gets ugly 

Agree totally, I did complain about the defense all year and their obvious failure to cover guys in the slot. Do that and it doesn’t matter who is in goal, your opponent is going to convert a lot of those chances. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MB3 said:

If you believe that last year was atrocious for Blackwood because of the bad heel injury, the combination of he and Vanicek should be playoff caliber. I was most nervous the Devils would go into the year with Blackwood/Bernier, and it doesn’t seem like that’s the case. 

If you believe it wasn’t any injury and Blackwood went from “fringe top-10 goalie in the NHL” to “possibly the worst goalie in franchise history” over the course of one offseason, we’re probably fvcked. But i choose not to be that pessimist.

Well said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MB3 said:

If you believe that last year was atrocious for Blackwood because of the bad heel injury, the combination of he and Vanicek should be playoff caliber. I was most nervous the Devils would go into the year with Blackwood/Bernier, and it doesn’t seem like that’s the case. 

If you believe it wasn’t any injury and Blackwood went from “fringe top-10 goalie in the NHL” to “possibly the worst goalie in franchise history” over the course of one offseason, we’re probably fvcked. But i choose not to be that pessimist.

The reason I want to see Blackwood post-injury is this:

 Combination of the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 seasons:

70 games, 64 starts. 

31-24-8 record with a 2.72gaa and a .916 save %

 

Those are great numbers for a rookie/sophomore season on a terrible team. I don’t think it just disappeared. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Devil Dan 56 said:

The reason I want to see Blackwood post-injury is this:

 Combination of the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 seasons:

70 games, 64 starts. 

31-24-8 record with a 2.72gaa and a .916 save %

 

Those are great numbers for a rookie/sophomore season on a terrible team. I don’t think it just disappeared. 

I think we’d all sign up for that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Puckbuster said:

I’m not concerned with the offense.  I think the issue is still at goal.  

We still need a winger who can finish with consistency. Sharangovich hasn’t proven to be that guy yet. Holtz could step into that role but asking a rookie to lead the team in goals is a lot. Bratt is more a passer than a shooter. So, which winger is taking up this role? We missed a ton of grade A chances last year (Sharangovich being a prime offender)…can’t keep wasting Jack’s playmaking.

The other question I still have, and it’s a legitimate one, is who is our third goalie for when Blackwood gets hurts and Vanecek decides to retire and try his hand on Broadway a week before preseason? Bernier ain’t healthy. So is it back to square one with Daws? 

Edited by devlman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, devlman said:

We still need a winger who can finish with consistency. Sharangovich hasn’t proven to be that guy yet.

He kind of has though. 

16 goals in 54 GP

24 goals in 76 GP

I think it’s pretty safe to pencil him in as at least a 20 goal scorer going forward. Probably more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nicomo said:

He kind of has though. 

16 goals in 54 GP

24 goals in 76 GP

I think it’s pretty safe to pencil him in as at least a 20 goal scorer going forward. Probably more. 

Unless he’s talking about streakiness, there was a large portion of last season where he disappeared. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a great trade. I don’t want to take anything away from that, but I have to say I am bummed that we never got to see Ty realize his potential. I remember being so excited when he fell in that draft for us to take him. He probably doesn’t have much of a role on this team with Hughes, Nemec, and Hamilton being here long term. But he really was quite a prospect, and I always felt that he would figure it out in time. He definitely had the IQ both offensively and defensively to be a strong defenseman. I don’t know what happened in his sophomore season that turned him into a different player. The skating and decision making both took massive steps back.

I’ll continue to keep an eye on him in Pittsburgh. He could find his game there, and getting such a great return for him will make that sting a little less. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Nicomo said:

He kind of has though. 

16 goals in 54 GP

24 goals in 76 GP

I think it’s pretty safe to pencil him in as at least a 20 goal scorer going forward. Probably more. 

A 20 goal scorer from a top 6 winger is going to be your leading winger on a playoff team?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mfitz804 said:

Unless he’s talking about streakiness, there was a large portion of last season where he disappeared. 

A lot of goal scorers are streaky though. Palms was the best shooter we had since Kovy, and he was the definition of streaky. I’d still call his automatic 25-30 goals a season consistent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, devlman said:

A 20 goal scorer from a top 6 winger is going to be your leading winger on a playoff team?

Well no, hopefully Bratt is. But I could realistically see all 3 of Bratt, Jack, and Sharongovich having 30+ goals. 

I’m not even saying they shouldn’t be looking to add another winger btw. Just that Sharongovich has proved he can finish at a nice rate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mfitz804 said:

Agree totally, I did complain about the defense all year and their obvious failure to cover guys in the slot. Do that and it doesn’t matter who is in goal, your opponent is going to convert a lot of those chances. 

I actually just saw something yesterday about how Gillies and Daws were supposedly the 2 worst goalies in the league at giving up long goals. Which are obviously just total back breakers. A healthy Mac and Vanecek can at least be better than that. 

Edited by Nicomo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nicomo said:

Well no, hopefully Bratt is. But I could realistically see all 3 of Bratt, Jack, and Sharongovich having 30+ goals. 

I’m not even saying they shouldn’t be looking to add another winger btw. Just that Sharongovich has proved he can finish at a nice rate. 

Well, I don’t consider 20 goals on a playoff team playing next to Jack a nice rate. Hence why we need another winger.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, devlman said:

Well, I don’t consider 20 goals on a playoff team playing next to Jack a nice rate. Hence why we need another winger.

He had 24 this year. And that was with Jack missing 30 games. 

But it’s fine, I’m clearly higher on him than you are. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Nicomo said:

A lot of goal scorers are streaky though. Palms was the best shooter we had since Kovy, and he was the definition of streaky. I’d still call his automatic 25-30 goals a season consistent. 

Yeah that whole "streaky" thing is weird at times. Cause i mean... if you score 30 goals in a season... it means that you're on a pace to score every 2-3 games, that's what you bring to the team every season... some games you'll score 2... you'll score a few games in a row too... but it means that overall you'll have a few games without a goal, obviously.

Then the argument is that well he scored 20 in the first half of the season and only 10 in the second half its not good... which i also get what they are saying. But if he went on a long cold streak... and still ended up with 30 goals... it means he was a very very hot streak at some point too. And those goals may means a few extra wins for the team. There's also other players who should contribute

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Nicomo said:

He had 24 this year. And that was with Jack missing 30 games. 

But it’s fine, I’m clearly higher on him than you are. 

yeah i believe it's him that wanted Sharangovich out of the top 6 at all cost cause he was not a top 6 winger

Edited by SterioDesign
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.