MB3 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 38 minutes ago, mfitz804 said: Just saw this on eBay, @MB3, imma need your home address. either you forgot a link or you saw a pipe bomb on ebay and accidentally externalized your thoughts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfitz804 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 (edited) 19 minutes ago, MB3 said: either you forgot a link or you saw a pipe bomb on ebay and accidentally externalized your thoughts It’s better than a pipe bomb. Edited January 11 by mfitz804 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guadana Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 When Haula in the ice - 60%+ of goals positive difference. "GuY cAn`T dO nOtHiNg!". May be someone should make dirty work to help other player to score. Even without scoring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Dan 56 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 1 hour ago, mfitz804 said: 5 goals last night and none by Jack, we should trade him immediately. To the Rangers, for Kakko. At least Kakko can play with men Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 18 minutes ago, Guadana said: When Haula in the ice - 60%+ of goals positive difference. "GuY cAn`T dO nOtHiNg!". May be someone should make dirty work to help other player to score. Even without scoring. Most of those minutes have come with Hughes, who’s clearly become a “is going to put up some numbers no matter who he’s stuck with” kind of player. If Haula could EVER finish the chances Jack creates for him, that percentage would be even better. Take him off Jack’s line and that percentage will drop in time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MB3 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 19 minutes ago, Guadana said: When Haula in the ice - 60%+ of goals positive difference. "GuY cAn`T dO nOtHiNg!". May be someone should make dirty work to help other player to score. Even without scoring. lmao what absolute horrendous logic. the 2 “best” haula lines that have a 100% GF are for a whopping total of 4 goals. The line he’s currently on is Hughes’ third best GF% pairing, and you think that points to Haula being a positive contributor?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guadana Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 (edited) 26 minutes ago, MB3 said: lmao what absolute horrendous logic. the 2 “best” haula lines that have a 100% GF are for a whopping total of 4 goals. The line he’s currently on is Hughes’ third best GF% pairing, and you think that points to Haula being a positive contributor?? lmao is the way of thinking that remove Haula from Jack line will make Jack life easier. Why they didn`t do that before? You are sitting there and smart enough to understand that, but they don`t? I'm sure they continue to act like this just to annoy really smart people. I think I have eyes to see how Jack`s line is working with and without Haula and how much work Jack should to carry the line by his own. So yeah, I think Haula is positive contributor for Jack, like Jack is a positive contributor for Haula of course, because he is Jack Hughes. And we are talking about goals for only. Shot stat and situation stat could bring much more space for situation, but I don't see the point of loading. Edited January 11 by Guadana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MB3 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 1 minute ago, Guadana said: lmao is the way of thinking that remove Haula from Jack line will make Jack life easier. Why they didn`t do that before? You are sitting there and smart enough to understand that, but they don`t? I'm sure they continue to act like this just to annoy really smart people. I think I have eyes to see how Jack`s line is working with and without Haula and how much work Jack should to carry the line by his own. So yeah, I think Haula is positive contributor for Jack, like Jack is a positive contributor for Haula of course, because he is Jack Hughes. And we are talking about goals for only. Shot stat and situation stat could bring much more space for situation, but I don't see the point of loading. So you presented a chart to mock all of the people here who think that Haula shouldn't be in the top-6, and in literally 15 minutes have switched your argument to "muh eye test!" and "the chart doesn't even show other things bro". You're bad at this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guadana Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 (edited) 16 minutes ago, MB3 said: So you presented a chart to mock all of the people here who think that Haula shouldn't be in the top-6, and in literally 15 minutes have switched your argument to "muh eye test!" and "the chart doesn't even show other things bro". You're bad at this. I gave you a chart that confirms the eye test. And explains what is happening. This is literally what statistics exist for. I have an abstract question for you - how often do you go to a psychologist and what grades did you have in English and logic. Usually people with poorly developed speech and logical/logical way of thinking may well grow into an adequate personality, but they may experience some problems with consistent thinking. You are quite an emotional person, and you often get involved in disputes in which you are not only not well versed enough, but also cannot withstand discussions within the framework. Maybe it hurts your ego. And you have to be able to let go of such things. After all, it costs nothing, but in the end join people together. I noticed that you quite often participate in such obviously unsuccessful discussions for you, without having sufficient grounds for them. I think that a psychologist could help you with this for sure, at least it is part of their work, as far as I have heard. I`m not tellin you are psycho, please don`t understand me this way, I`m tellin that some strange thing triggers you and you are starting act like you are acting in those conversation. As if this is a personal dispute, and not a conversation on an abstract topic. Edited January 11 by Guadana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MB3 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 1 minute ago, Guadana said: I gave you a chart that confirms the eye test. And explains what is happening. This is literally what statistics exist for. You provided a chart that literally does the opposite. The sample size is ridiculously small, but even if we ignore that, your chart says: Haula is best when he's not on Jack's line, and Hughes best lines are without Haula You're still bad at this. (I'll ignore the weird rant at the end because it sounds like the homeless guy who lives at the corner of US1 near my office when he's shouting nonsense into the air to nobody in particular) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guadana Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 (edited) 12 minutes ago, MB3 said: You provided a chart that literally does the opposite. The sample size is ridiculously small, but even if we ignore that, your chart says: Haula is best when he's not on Jack's line, and Hughes best lines are without Haula You're still bad at this. (I'll ignore the weird rant at the end because it sounds like the homeless guy who lives at the corner of US1 near my office when he's shouting nonsense into the air to nobody in particular) Sample size is 40 games - that`s all we have, Jack is playing well with Haula. If you want shot\situation stat you can check https://www.naturalstattrick.com/teamreport.php?team=N.J That will help you to see how lines act. Please don`t fiorget about ice time - lines with a couple of minutes doesn`t bring a lot in full picture. Good luck. Hope, you will start to recognize something and don`t be the guy who is always trying to argue and be the douche of the world like every conversation should end like a rap battle. Let's admit that discussion of a homeless crazy and evil rapper with a small ego\dick is not the best picture to watch from the side for other readers. Good luck. Edited January 11 by Guadana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicomo Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 Well this took an odd turn… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MB3 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 6 minutes ago, Nicomo said: Well this took an odd turn… I have never been called an "evil rapper" before but Guadana called me "a great dude" on 01/05/2022 so I've got that going for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 FWIW Dawson's put up 6 G and 11 A over his last 23 GP, somewhat quietly (with the exception of last night, which was anything but quiet). Included in that stretch is a 7-game pointless streak, but hopefully he'll start to find more consistency. BTW over the 23 games, the Devils were 8-1-2 in the games where he had at least one point, and 3-8-1 when he didn't. So yeah, would be awesome if he finds a way to keep this up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guadana Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 23 minutes ago, Colorado Rockies 1976 said: FWIW Dawson's put up 6 G and 11 A over his last 23 GP, somewhat quietly (with the exception of last night, which was anything but quiet). Included in that stretch is a 7-game pointless streak, but hopefully he'll start to find more consistency. BTW over the 23 games, the Devils were 8-1-2 in the games where he had at least one point, and 3-8-1 when he didn't. So yeah, would be awesome if he finds a way to keep this up. It`s harder to win without secondary scoring. Especially against stronger("slower") teams, that were faced by the devils in december. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 9 minutes ago, Guadana said: It`s harder to win without secondary scoring. Especially against stronger("slower") teams, that were faced by the devils in december. Yeah many of us have brought that up. The Devils sometimes are too reliant on Jack-Nico-Bratt for goals. Hurts that much more that Sharangovich, Tatar and of course Haula simply don’t find the net enough. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfitz804 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 1 hour ago, Guadana said: I have an abstract question for you - how often do you go to a psychologist I think we all know that the answer to that is "nowhere near enough". 1 hour ago, Guadana said: like every conversation should end like a rap battle. Am I wrong or is this a REALLY good idea... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capo Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 I really like that McLeod, Mercer, Boqvist line. Boqvist has been really good this year in his role. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puckbuster Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 2 hours ago, Devil Dan 56 said: At least Kakko can play with men Even when there’s wood? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guadana Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 2 hours ago, Colorado Rockies 1976 said: Yeah many of us have brought that up. The Devils sometimes are too reliant on Jack-Nico-Bratt for goals. Hurts that much more that Sharangovich, Tatar and of course Haula simply don’t find the net enough. Should be great when Mercer will be ready enough to play regular top-6 role, but, like I said, someone should make a dirty work. Sharangovich is very streaky and his 10 goals as bottom player for 40 games is good result. I think when he will be on again, it will help to win games easily. And of course if Devils as organisation wants to win more against better teams, they should find better players for Nico and Jack who can make dirty work and score goals on more consistent basis. I think Mercer has big potential for that(I`m not a fan of his positional play, but I think may be even in his borders he can be good contributor on Nico line, may be he will be better player without the puck with time and will play strong on the Jack`s wing regulary), other than that... Gritsyuk is a scorer, but he is offensive first player, Holtz is a good shooter\passer, but his game without the puck, especially defensive game is bad in the moment of time. Foote isn`t fast enough to play Ruff`s game as top-6 F, Thompson? I think injuries ruined his development. Fitz still has something to work on(and don`t have 'insurance" center), but it`s great to see succesful team. Vegas missed playoff because of injuries of best players last year, Colorado has the same problem this year, I don`t how bad their situation is, may be they will figure it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob_Ottawa Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 Was surprised Fitz didn't grab his son off waivers. That must be really hard to put business first over your own son. I mean, he could have at least played in Utica for us. I guess Florida had first pick over us so maybe he would have taken him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagknife Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 4 hours ago, Rob_Ottawa said: Was surprised Fitz didn't grab his son off waivers. That must be really hard to put business first over your own son. I mean, he could have at least played in Utica for us. I guess Florida had first pick over us so maybe he would have taken him. Florida is significantly below us in the standings, wouldn’t have been shocked if Fitz claimed him, but it never got to us. that being said, was hoping he wouldn’t just grab his son Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfitz804 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 4 hours ago, Rob_Ottawa said: Was surprised Fitz didn't grab his son off waivers. That must be really hard to put business first over your own son. I mean, he could have at least played in Utica for us. I guess Florida had first pick over us so maybe he would have taken him. That is kinda messed up, like “Dad, I just lost my job, what am I gonna do?” ”I guess you have to go find another one”, knowing full well he could have provided said job. But, good on him for not buckling and realizing his kid kinda sucks at hockey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 16 hours ago, Guadana said: I gave you a chart that confirms the eye test. And explains what is happening. This is literally what statistics exist for. I have an abstract question for you - how often do you go to a psychologist and what grades did you have in English and logic. Usually people with poorly developed speech and logical/logical way of thinking may well grow into an adequate personality, but they may experience some problems with consistent thinking. You are quite an emotional person, and you often get involved in disputes in which you are not only not well versed enough, but also cannot withstand discussions within the framework. Maybe it hurts your ego. And you have to be able to let go of such things. After all, it costs nothing, but in the end join people together. I noticed that you quite often participate in such obviously unsuccessful discussions for you, without having sufficient grounds for them. I think that a psychologist could help you with this for sure, at least it is part of their work, as far as I have heard. I`m not tellin you are psycho, please don`t understand me this way, I`m tellin that some strange thing triggers you and you are starting act like you are acting in those conversation. As if this is a personal dispute, and not a conversation on an abstract topic. I disagree with you about Haula but i do agree with you about MB3 lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Figure everyone could use a chuckle on a dreary day: Mike McLeod: 41 GP, 4 G, 14 A, 18 Pts Alexis Lafailiere: 41 GP, 5 G, 13 A, 18 Pts Kaapo Kakko: 42 GP, 9 G, 9 A, 18 Pts 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.