NJDevils1214 Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 2 minutes ago, Colorado Rockies 1976 said: Yeah Fitz pretty much said he’ll have to create more space to do anything. Still think that means Wood will be the one to go, but he may have to attach a mid-round pick to make that happen. With Wood being a negative asset and 3.2MM I assumed it would take at least a first to unload him, let alone get something in return. Who knows tho. Teams are wheelin' and dealin' all over today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crisis Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 Parayko would be awesome for a 3rd pairing but his contract is unworkable. He turns 30 in May Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 1 minute ago, NJDevils1214 said: With Wood being a negative asset and 3.2MM I assumed it would take at least a first to unload him, let alone get something in return. Who knows tho. Teams are wheelin' and dealin' all over today. I’m more saying Wood + mid-round pick would be for future considerations. Anyone Fitz would bring in would be in a separate deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDevils1214 Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 2 minutes ago, Colorado Rockies 1976 said: I’m more saying Wood + mid-round pick would be for future considerations. Anyone Fitz would bring in would be in a separate deal. I hear you. One trade or several, my point is it will take more than a 3rd. I am looking at what OTT had to give up to get rid of Zaitsev. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDevils1214 Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagknife Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 My prediction a week or two ago was that Meier would be traded today cause I wasn’t gonna have my phone for most of the afternoon. Turns out everyone panicked today once we got our man over the weekend 😉 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob_Ottawa Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 (edited) So the Tampa strategy: give up way too much for support pieces now once window is open. Then in a couple years you are guaranteed to be bad, but you also get a better chance at getting top draft picks later to repeat the cycle. As long as fans can handle a five year sh!t time then I kind of see the logic. Edited March 1 by Rob_Ottawa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Dan 56 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 11 minutes ago, Rob_Ottawa said: So the Tampa strategy: give up way too much for support pieces now once window is open. Then in a couple years you are guaranteed to be bad, but you also get a better chance at getting top draft picks later to repeat the cycle. As long as fans can handle a five year sh!t time then I kind of see the logic. They should be careful because that 5 years can turn into 10 real fast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aitchmack Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 2 hours ago, Colorado Rockies 1976 said: Goes from his second tour of duty with the Caps to his second tour of duty with the Wild…weird. I'd forgotten he went to Wild before. Deja Vu time for him then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 1 hour ago, NJDevils1214 said: I hear you. One trade or several, my point is it will take more than a 3rd. I am looking at what OTT had to give up to get rid of Zaitsev. Yeah Fitz simply may not be able to make more cap room happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 1 minute ago, Aitchmack said: I'd forgotten he went to Wild before. Deja Vu time for him then. After spending a bunch of seasons with the Caps to start his career, he done a ton of bouncing around. Over 800 GP for his career though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Dan 56 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 Chicago retained 50% of Kane’s salary and Arizona retained 25% so the rags are paying the remaining 25%. This is within the “spirit of the CBA” 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 Just now, Devil Dan 56 said: Chicago retained 50% of Kane’s salary and Arizona retained 25% so the rags are paying the remaining 25%. This is within the “spirit of the CBA” What did Arizona get out of doing that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2ELIAS6 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 Just now, Devil Dan 56 said: Chicago retained 50% of Kane’s salary and Arizona retained 25% so the rags are paying the remaining 25%. This is within the “spirit of the CBA” SCAM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicomo Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 11 minutes ago, Devil Dan 56 said: Chicago retained 50% of Kane’s salary and Arizona retained 25% so the rags are paying the remaining 25%. This is within the “spirit of the CBA” You can’t make this sh!t up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Sundstrom Ghost Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 1 hour ago, NJDevils1214 said: I hear you. One trade or several, my point is it will take more than a 3rd. I am looking at what OTT had to give up to get rid of Zaitsev. Completely different situation, Wood is gone after this year, Z is stuck for another year, that's why Ott had to pay extra. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fansinz88 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 21 minutes ago, Colorado Rockies 1976 said: What did Arizona get out of doing that? 3rd round pick somewhere I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Dan 56 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 20 minutes ago, Colorado Rockies 1976 said: What did Arizona get out of doing that? A 2025 3rd I believe 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 Just now, Devil Dan 56 said: A 2025 3rd I believe Yep just saw that. So basically bought a pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog2020 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 fvck those losers 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Sundstrom Ghost Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 (edited) Nick Bjugstad is sitting tonight, he's someone who would be an upgrade from the probable sex pest as a 4th line center. Does not make much, is a FA after season, I wonder if we are in on him. Edited March 1 by Patrick Sundstrom Ghost Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDevils1214 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slasher72 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 Gotta love Sportsnet. They're now saying the Rangers are the "team to beat" and best in the NHL because of Kane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicomo Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 23 minutes ago, NJDevils1214 said: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 (edited) 5 hours ago, Nicomo said: I feel for him but at the same time, dude…you are KILLING your team at this point. An .845 save% over your last 15 games?! What exactly are the Kings supposed to do here? They can’t kill their season and not address a major shortcoming. And the fact is that he’s been largely meh for years now…since the start of the 2018-19 season, he’s put up a .896 save% and a GSAA of -60.6. This is Mackenzie Blackwood-type stuff. Edited March 1 by Colorado Rockies 1976 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.