Jump to content

GDT: Devils @ Toronto


MadDog2020

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 311
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah... The refs are really Bias against the devils.... seeing that they have the best PP:SH ratio in the league.

Obviosuly you missed the non-call that led to the Leafs goal. Also, the Devils have learned something called discipline, maybe your team should learn it, who knows, maybe you'll win the Cup then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pelley showed he was a rookie by taking that semi-breakaway shot from so far out.

If he waited 1 more second he could have deked and lifted it for his first goal. That was a big sway in the Laff's favor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah... The refs are really Bias against the devils.... seeing that they have the best PP:SH ratio in the league.

I'm sure discipline has nothing to do with that. :rolleyes:

I am anxious to hear your argument for why there should not have been a call there.

Pelley showed he was a rookie by taking that semi-breakaway shot from so far out.

If he waited 1 more second he could have deked and lifted it for his first goal. That was a big sway in the Laff's favor.

No way, he would have gotten tripped and the play would have went back down the ice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way, he would have gotten tripped and the play would have went back down the ice.

He would have drawn a penalty atleast, you're not gonna beat Raycroft 5 hole from above the hash dead center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know if you actually look at the play you see he hooked the puck as the trip happened, that's a fair non-call... the "pick" on Clarkson was rather touchy though....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know if you actually look at the play you see he hooked the puck as the trip happened, that's a fair non-call... the "pick" on Clarkson was rather touchy though....

true, but this is just a standard call usually - it could've gone either way.

two weak calls on NJ and nothing on Toronto - meh. Toronto's got Hal Gill and Pavel Kubina - 1 to 1 says one of them takes a minor in the next period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know if you actually look at the play you see he hooked the puck as the trip happened, that's a fair non-call... the "pick" on Clarkson was rather touchy though....

On the replay it did look like he might have touched the puck but if you ask me, that rule never really made sense. Just because the puck is touched prior to tripping another player its not a penalty? Maybe Pandolfo could have got to a rebound or created some offensive opportunity, but its hard to do that when your sliding on the ice. If they are going to make those tacky calls on the Devils, the Pandolfo trip needs to be a penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh. Had the Lafs been called for the hook or trip, They woulda just called Pando for the dive as well, so it wouldn't have mattered in the long run. Woulda stopped play fer a few seconds though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.