LucifersDog Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 That's a Flyers goal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicducksauce Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 hahaha chico is such a homer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weekes Head Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 that's totally inconclusive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeCups Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 That's a Flyers goal We know you are hoping it is, but I do not think it is conclusive enough.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Death Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 WHAT A SAVE????????? It looked in from the overhead! We'll get screwed!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshall Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Chico erupts in 5, 4, 3... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'7' Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 That's probably a goal...but I don't see any definitive camera angles. Should be no goal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thefiestygoat Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I won't be shocked if they call it a goal. Looks like a goal but I don't think it is enough conclusive evidence to overturn the call. Don't they need to be able to see the full puck across the line and not assume anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmigliore Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 (edited) Looks like a goal based off of Chico's dissection of the replay. Edited February 11, 2010 by nmigliore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'7' Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 (edited) I won't be shocked if they call it a goal. Looks like a goal but I don't think it is enough conclusive evidence to overturn the call. Don't they need to be able to see the full puck across the line and not assume anything? yes and there is no such angle that proves this. but I'm pretty sure it was in Edited February 11, 2010 by '7' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeCups Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I won't be shocked if they call it a goal. Looks like a goal but I don't think it is enough conclusive evidence to overturn the call. Don't they need to be able to see the full puck across the line and not assume anything? YES, which is why if it is called a goal it is total BS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biggie B Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Can this PK be any less lethargic? It's driving me insane.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weekes Head Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 sigh. the devils would be awesome if hockey games weren't 60 minutes long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicducksauce Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 looks like it, but camera isn't definitive. why can't the NHL get at least some of those super hi-speed cameras that the NFL uses? oh yeah, $$$ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog2020 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 That's probably a goal...but I don't see any definitive camera angles. Should be no goal This. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeCups Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Longest review ever.....NO GOAL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aznjsn Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 this is too early for a meltdown... we didn't even get to the fkin second period yet. either way that was a nice save by marty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thefiestygoat Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Credit the officials, they got it right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weekes Head Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 hahahaha chico: "drama." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Death Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 woooooooooo!!! NO GOAL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicducksauce Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 they really need an RFID chip in the puck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LucifersDog Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 (edited) We know you are hoping it is, but I do not think it is conclusive enough.... Why would I hope it was a Flyers goal? You so don't understand. Chico thought it was a goal and he's a homer. Edited February 11, 2010 by LucifersDog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeCups Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Why would I hope it was a Flyers goal? You so don't understand. So you can jump on here with your usual anti-Marty tirades of course.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Souray44 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 This is going to be one of those crazy games... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicducksauce Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 if kovy gets the GWG i am getting a jersey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.