Jump to content

New Kovy Update ("As the Kovy Turns")


DevsFan7545

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

TG in his blog:

http://blogs.northjersey.com/blogs/fireice/devils-kovalchuk_still_waiting_for_nhl_to_complete_review_of_latest_contrac/

So it will be near or at the $100M. possibly the 13/98 or 14or 15/100. just do not see the 14 or 15 years. 13 sounds more approving by the league.

13/98 is a painful cap hit to swallow.

dreger saying it's 15 years around 100 million. i don't see how the league accepts such a contract.

If the back is heavier than Hossa's, I don't see why not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13/98 is a painful cap hit to swallow.

If the back is heavier than Hossa's, I don't see why not.

it sounds like the devils' main selling point is the more uniform distribution of cash through the life of the deal

that is how they might win this round, with minimal variation in salary changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reports are saying that the new contract takes care of the problems the league has had with various proposals over the past several weeks. If it is indeed 15 years, then we have to assume that the league is OK with that amount of years. It must have been other issues (NMC / NTC, etc) that the league was having issues with.

And just another confirmation of the 15 years:

TGfireandice I too hear 15 years $100 million as approx numbers on new Kovy contract. The number of years could still be sticking point.

Edited by Amberite
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I remeber of the arbitrator ruling it was the odds of him playing given how few players have played past 40(but then again, how many players are there that have performed at Kovys level)and then the massive drop off (Maybe thats the second sticking point for Kovy, more back end money on the deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's not the length - it's the fact that kovalchuk is 42 at the end of it, making it unlikely he'll be playing.

So if there is more back end money, less obvious NMC NTC or at least ones that don't make it clear it looks like a 7 year deal at 70 mil then does that hold water. :noclue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's not the length - it's the fact that kovalchuk is 42 at the end of it, making it unlikely he'll be playing.

True but both Hossa and Luongo go to that age. Definitely weakens NHL's argument at any potential arbitration since they already approved deals going to that age. IMO, the bigger issue is how the money is applied to the back end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the final years of the contract are $1.5-2M, and the NTC/NMC was fixed to the NHL's liking, I don't see why the league would reject it, 15 years or not. 42 is a very plausible age for a player to stay active until, and $3-4M is enough of an incentive to keep playing those extra 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if Bettman doesn't try to railroad this then what do you think Lou has on him: A live boy or a dead hooker?

he has always been fond of Cindy Crosby and he is a well hmmm what is he again,, ??? I see what your saying...

Edited by Devs1965
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.