Daniel Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 My link While I think a lot of claims of wrongful convictions are bogus (usually the press will hide the bad facts in a particular case), this seems like a pretty clear cut case. Notice though it's not a new trial, but only a new "hearing" as to whether DNA evidence would be helpful at this juncture. It's possible that it won't, not because it wouldn't have exonerated them at the time, but that I would imagine the specimans become degridated enough that any results would be inconclusive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SC Devs Fan Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 it will make Johnny Depp happy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts