Triumph Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 MC79hockey did an in-depth look at NJ's bizarre territorial results from last year: http://www.mc79hockey.com/?p=6327 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 (edited) This quote from the article sums it all up, really: "The downside that the Devils had is that they couldn’t score goals or make saves so all the Corsi% in the world didn’t get them over the line for the playoffs." And as he notes, at the very least, having Schneider will help with one half of the equation. Can't see the Devils putting up an aggragate .897 save% again. We won't know for a while about the other half...these guys are going to need some time. I won't jump to any conclusions if they struggle to score OR somehow come flying out of the gate and pop in 3+ per game. Gotta see how this works out, and if the older guys can stay healthy. Edited October 2, 2013 by Colorado Rockies 1976 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 People in the comments mentioned DeBoer's coaching style as an explanation. Does anyone know whether his Panther teams had unusually high puck possession as compared to wins and goals scored? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triumph Posted October 2, 2013 Author Share Posted October 2, 2013 Florida results from 2008-09 to 2010-11: 48.7% goals percentage, 46.7% shots percentage, 47.1% Fenwick percentage. So, no. And again, we don't see this last year until the Devils got Ponikarovsky, Josefson got healthy, NJ got Zidlicky, etc. I think personnel is the major reason and it's why I think they're going to be darn good again this year in that department. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.