section 110 Posted July 18, 2004 Share Posted July 18, 2004 give me the days of the old CBA - Vancouver makes a formal offer to Niedermayer, Lou makes the case at the arbitration hearing that we want Markus Naslund and Jovo in return........and wins! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammyk Posted July 18, 2004 Share Posted July 18, 2004 Just a thought we will be paying Nieds about 1.5 times Marty's salary if he gets 9.5 million Actually that's not really true. Marty's salary averages $8M/year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squishyx Posted July 18, 2004 Share Posted July 18, 2004 give me the days of the old CBA - Vancouver makes a formal offer to Niedermayer, Lou makes the case at the arbitration hearing that we want Markus Naslund and Jovo in return........and wins! haha is that really how it used to work? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Posted July 18, 2004 Share Posted July 18, 2004 give me the days of the old CBA - Vancouver makes a formal offer to Niedermayer, Lou makes the case at the arbitration hearing that we want Markus Naslund and Jovo in return........and wins! haha is that really how it used to work? I'm confused myself. Stevens was awarded to the Devils because the package of Joseph and Rod Brind'Amour was deemed insufficient compensation for Brendan Shanahan. However, Washington was awarded 5 first round draft picks by St. Louis for picking Scott Stevens. Why was there an arbitration hearing for Shanahan, but 5 first round picks for Stevens? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squishyx Posted July 18, 2004 Share Posted July 18, 2004 give me the days of the old CBA - Vancouver makes a formal offer to Niedermayer, Lou makes the case at the arbitration hearing that we want Markus Naslund and Jovo in return........and wins! haha is that really how it used to work? I'm confused myself. Stevens was awarded to the Devils because the package of Joseph and Rod Brind'Amour was deemed insufficient compensation for Brendan Shanahan. However, Washington was awarded 5 first round draft picks by St. Louis for picking Scott Stevens. Why was there an arbitration hearing for Shanahan, but 5 first round picks for Stevens? now you have really confused me... i was about 6 at the time, anyone mind clearing up exactly what happened and how we got stevens? i always figured FA from washington.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammyk Posted July 18, 2004 Share Posted July 18, 2004 Why was there an arbitration hearing for Shanahan, but 5 first round picks for Stevens? St. Louis didn't have five first round picks available as compensation for signing Shanahan, since they gave them up when they signed Stevens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nieuwy25 Posted July 19, 2004 Share Posted July 19, 2004 If this arbitration happens (if neids/devs dont sign longterm beforehand), I thinkLou will be more "gentile" in his approach with neids. As opposed to more "jewish"? Sorry . . . I couldn't resist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MykeAbner Posted July 29, 2004 Share Posted July 29, 2004 Hi! I'm a Canuck fan, but I think that this article may intrest you all. Niedermayers want to play together - for CanucksPhoto full image Scott Niedermayer (foreground) hugs brother Rob (with beard) at the end of the 2002-2003 Stanley Cup finals. Both would love to have a shot at winning a Stanley Cup together - in Vancouver. (Files) Kevin Woodley For mytelus.com VANCOUVER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MantaRay Posted July 29, 2004 Share Posted July 29, 2004 Interesting article. I could see it happening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swede Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 btw, all this salary discussion reminds me of the kind of $hit brodeur took from the NHLPA when he signed his last contract. quotes like "this selfish signing is hurting other players that will be compared to him. They will not get what they deserve" weren't uncommon... all OT, but i just thought of it when I read this and the pronger thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammyk Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 (edited) Isn't this an old article that we discussed already? EDIT: Edited July 30, 2004 by sammyk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MykeAbner Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 Isn't this an old article that we discussed already? If it is, I apologise. I looked around here for a bit and I didn't see anything like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammyk Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 Isn't this an old article that we discussed already? If it is, I apologise. I looked around here for a bit and I didn't see anything like this. Just seemed familiar. Either it fell off the first page or I read it on another site. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.