Jump to content

Whether you like +/- or not, this is weird:


Neb00rs

Recommended Posts

Player    +/-  

 

1 Jaromir Jagr   +20

2 Travis Zajac   +5

3 Andy Greene   +4

4 Dainius Zubrus   +4

5 Cam Janssen   +3

6 Marek Zidlicky   +2

7 Andrei Loktionov +2

8 Reid Boucher   +2

9 Jacob Josefson   +1

10 Adam Henrique +0

11 Anton Volchenkov    +0

12 Tim Sestito   +0

13 Joe Whitney  +0

14 Mark Fayne   -1

15 Rostislav Olesz      -1

16 Mike Sislo    -1

17 Bryce Salvador    -3

18 Adam Larsson   -4

19 Eric Gelinas      -5

20 Ryan Carter    -5

21 Patrik Elias     -6

22 Peter Harrold   -6

23 Jon Merrill      -7

24 Stephen Gionta   -8

25 Mattias Tedenby    -8

26 Michael Ryde    -10

27 Ryane Clowe   -10

28 Damien Brunner     -11

29 Steve Bernier    -15

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will happen from time to time - Vladimir Zharkov pulled it off on the 08-09 Lowell Devils, he was +23, next guy was +5.  What has to happen is that everyone he plays with does really well and then does really poorly away from him - Elias has only played 175 minutes with him, but they've scored 6 goals and given up 1 - when Elias is away from Jagr, he's been on the ice for 13 goals for and 23 goals against.  The goals against rate is 10 times higher.

Edited by Triumph
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will happen from time to time - Vladimir Zharkov pulled it off on the 08-09 Lowell Devils, he was +23, next guy was +5.  What has to happen is that everyone he plays with does really well and then does really poorly away from him - Elias has only played 175 minutes with him, but they've scored 6 goals and given up 1 - when Elias is away from Jagr, he's been on the ice for 13 goals for and 23 goals against.  The goals against rate is 10 times higher.

 

I accept this explanation, but it gives validity to the +/- stat, does it not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I accept this explanation, but it gives validity to the +/- stat, does it not?

 

I think it more was showing how random that stat can be.  Jagr and Elias are the same players when they're together as when they're apart.  They don't become scoring machines or defensive walls only when playing together, yet the randomness of the this seasons numbers says, for Elias, he was a monster if with Jagr and pretty horrid when not playing with Jagr.  In reality, Elias was the same player doing the same things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it more was showing how random that stat can be.  Jagr and Elias are the same players when they're together as when they're apart.  They don't become scoring machines or defensive walls only when playing together, yet the randomness of the this seasons numbers says, for Elias, he was a monster if with Jagr and pretty horrid when not playing with Jagr.  In reality, Elias was the same player doing the same things.

 

I understand your point, but the way I see it, by fact, it shows that Jagr has deviated from the mean as far as being on the ice for GF and off the ice for GA. The rest of the team goes pretty sequentially. That's why I don't think the range matters, nor do I think Bernier's -15 is weird just because another Devil is +20, because Bernier has players close to him. But, the fact that Jagr, is +20, shows me that he is playing a more responsible game than the rest of the team. I also suspect it could me the team possesses the puck better with Jagr on the ice, but that's speculation as I don't know the numbers there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.