NYCdevil Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 hockeybuzz.com rumors karel rachunek to go to colorado for john michael-liles.. doubt this would happen..seems like a go nowhere tradefor either teams..but if liles could stay healthy it could benefit us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triumph Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 sigh, this will never happen in the future please use the word 'rumor' in your title Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice dog Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 Єklund (2.3% accurate) (2.3% accurate) is such crap! his silly internet polluting gossip and nonsence is laughable! he probably gets his rumors trolling hfboards.com...so sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devilsdude530 Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 Ice Dog, in your sig, you spelled Doc's last name incorrectly. Emrick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJD Jester Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 Єklund (2.3% accurate) (2.3% accurate) is such crap!his silly internet polluting gossip and nonsence is laughable! Liles's name has been linked to the Devils for more than a while. But other than that, I totally agree with your post. <JESTER> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice dog Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 Ice Dog, in your sig, you spelled Doc's last name incorrectly. Emrick. oops...thanx for the heads up ...lol! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYCdevil Posted February 18, 2008 Author Share Posted February 18, 2008 I didn't say rumor cuz I said Єklund (2.3% accurate) (2.3% accurate)..same thing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxpower Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 (edited) I'm dumbfounded by this one. Is Liles UFA, or does he have some kind of horrible cap-clogger of a contract that would justify moving him for a UFA who'll probably up and move to Europe when the season ends? EDIT: Found it myself. UFA with exactly same cap hit as Rachunek. Edited February 18, 2008 by maxpower Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
empulse27 Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 Too bad it's Єklund (2.3% accurate) (2.3% accurate), because I would love for this trade to happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devils731 Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 It was an E1 which...let me see what that is on his list...means...Ecklund made it up and he doesn't even believe it's plausible...that is an E1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Fan Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 Both are UFAs and both are not doing well with their respective teams, so why the Avs would do this deal if Liles can be exchanged for a pick, even it is just merely a 4th roudn??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njdevil26 Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 hahaha Єklund (2.3% accurate) (2.3% accurate) just said the Rangers are his pick to win the East. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMONPETEYD Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 nail in their coffin if they even had a chance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SatansDevils Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 hockeybuzz.com rumors karel rachunek to go to colorado for john michael-liles.. doubt this would happen..seems like a go nowhere tradefor either teams..but if liles could stay healthy it could benefit us Too bad this will only be a RUMOR. I wish Lou would pull that trigger right now and deal Rachunek for John Michael Liles. Just not going to happen. There has to be another player or a pick for that trade to go down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmigliore Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 LMAO its an (e1) .. you have a better shot at winning the lottery than having this trade happen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MantaRay Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 Both are UFAs and both are not doing well with their respective teams, so why the Avs would do this deal if Liles can be exchanged for a pick, even it is just merely a 4th roudn??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MantaRay Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 Both are UFAs and both are not doing well with their respective teams, so why the Avs would do this deal if Liles can be exchanged for a pick, even it is just merely a 4th roudn??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brodeurrocks Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 Єklund (2.3% accurate) (2.3% accurate) is such crap!his silly internet polluting gossip and nonsence is laughable! he probably gets his rumors trolling hfboards.com...so sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Fan Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 Since when has Rachenuk, not played well? For the money he has been a great pick-up and lately has been our most physical D-man. I would not be surprised if Lou signed him to an extension, especially since Suter seems to like him alot. Like him??? He is a healthy scratch! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MantaRay Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 He was a healthy scratch to showcase Greene and Brookbank in potential trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Fan Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 He was a healthy scratch to showcase Greene and Brookbank in potential trade. Oh, if a player is playing so great, why the team takes him out of the line-up in order to showcase other players' skills??? You'll never see Lidstrom or Pronger or Niedermayer being scratched for the others??? The reason is because those players are great players and Rachunek, I agree that he has his skills, but lately his defensive game is a huge question mark and that is why he is not in the line up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devils731 Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 So by this defintion of players bring scratched, any time a player is scratched it's because they're worse than the player being put in for them? Imagine the players Carolina was fielding last game to take Erik Cole's spot in the lineup, I had no idea how good that team actually was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowutopia Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 So basically the Devils aren't going to pick anyone up of any value? Awesome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SatansDevils Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 (edited) He was a healthy scratch to showcase Greene and Brookbank in potential trade. Edited February 20, 2008 by SatansDevils Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevilinLA Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 Highly doubt it was a showcase for Greene and Brookbank. Vishnevski and Rachunek have not been playing very well in the last couple of games and Sutter decided it was time for a change and it worked. Greene and Brookbank deserve to be in the line up right now. It would be a bad move by Sutter if he didn't play Greene and Brookbank tomorrow night vs. the Sharks. If anything possibly Brookbank might be in a trade but no way will Greene will be in a trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.