Jerrydevil Posted December 24, 2009 Author Share Posted December 24, 2009 without kovalchuk they're not going to have one. that hossa deal really worked out, huh? and that's pretty much the most they can expect to get for kovalchuk. They are in a very, very tough spot, that's for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HellOnICE Posted December 24, 2009 Share Posted December 24, 2009 without kovalchuk they're not going to have one. that hossa deal really worked out, huh? and that's pretty much the most they can expect to get for kovalchuk. Tri, if Waddell knew what to ask for ...the Hossa deal might've worked out. He got crap for Hossa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voros19 Posted December 24, 2009 Share Posted December 24, 2009 Kovalchuk is worth $10M. A top five talent in the NHL, capable of scoring 50 consistently. You can make that claim for one, maybe two other players. Anyone who uses +/- to assess defensively ability is moronic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerrydevil Posted December 24, 2009 Author Share Posted December 24, 2009 Kovalchuk is worth $10M. A top five talent in the NHL, capable of scoring 50 consistently. You can make that claim for one, maybe two other players. Anyone who uses +/- to assess defensively ability is moronic. I think it can't be the ONLY indicator. But I stated my case that it's damning for Kovalchuk to have no plus seasons with Atlanta when Hossa had two of them in the plus-15 range. Even Marc Savard managed a plus-7 season. Plus, I go with what my eyes tell me. He's a floater when his team doesn't have the puck. He's not worth $10 million for a team that wants to win. He's only worth $10 million because some misguided team will give him the money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triumph Posted December 24, 2009 Share Posted December 24, 2009 (edited) Tri, if Waddell knew what to ask for ...the Hossa deal might've worked out. He got crap for Hossa. huh? no. waddell got a lot of different stuff, which is what an organization that doesn't have any ability to draft needs. if the trade goes well, they plug up a lot of organizational holes. if it doesn't, they may get close to nothing. there's only a few teams that would have wanted hossa - TG rammed that 'lou was in the mix for hossa' down our throats - could our offer have even beaten the one the penguins came up with? it's very difficult to make this sort of a deal in a salary cap era - you're not going to have deals like morrison and pederson for mogilny anymore. teams aren't giving up top-level future NHL talent for rentals - they need those players to compete. Edited December 24, 2009 by Triumph Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek21 Posted December 24, 2009 Share Posted December 24, 2009 They'd do better at the gate with a winning team. The problem is exactly what Prucent and Tri already have indicated along with myself. Without Kovy, why should Thrasher fans go? He means a lot to that franchise. This ain't Hossa. It's their top banana. Atlanta has only made the playoffs once. They have a good enough team to go for it. Selling their most marketable player? Eh. If they could add another piece, they'd be in the top 6 with a chance. The argument against is that they're not better than the elite 3 (NJD, Pit, Wsh). Their fanbase has never seen a playoff win and are starved for it. Winning a round would mean a lot. Perhaps it would convince Kovalchuk to stay. There's a huge risk bc you don't want to lose a homegrown star for zilch. Whatever they decide will be extremely tough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voros19 Posted December 24, 2009 Share Posted December 24, 2009 (edited) I think it can't be the ONLY indicator. But I stated my case that it's damning for Kovalchuk to have no plus seasons with Atlanta when Hossa had two of them in the plus-15 range. Even Marc Savard managed a plus-7 season. Plus, I go with what my eyes tell me. He's a floater when his team doesn't have the puck. He's not worth $10 million for a team that wants to win. He's only worth $10 million because some misguided team will give him the money. That proves absolutely nothing. Plus minus measures productivity, not defensive acumen. It has a ton of noise since +/- is affected by teammates, quality of competition, and goaltending (this variable should not matter much over a large enough sample, although a season's worth isn't big enough in my opinion). Kovalchuk and Hossa did not have identical linemates and opponents, so you're argument is useless. In addition Triumph already stated that Hossa's presence on the penalty kill would artificially inflate his +/- compared to Kovalchuk's. Finally, wingers do not have a tremendous effect on preventing goals from being scored. That responsibility lies with defensemen and centers, so don't immediately suspect that differences in +/- among two wingers will be because of their defensive ability. And another thing. Hossa is known as an extremely good defensive player, so it's logical that he would have a higher +/- than Kovalchuk (ignoring all the points above). The fact that he has a lower +/- doesn't automatically characterize Kovalchuk as bad defensively, or a floater. Most Atlanta fans recognize the fact that he has matured as a hockey player over the last several years and is fairly responsible in all facets of the game. You're touting a stereotype from 2004. Edited December 24, 2009 by Voros19 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prucenterrules Posted December 24, 2009 Share Posted December 24, 2009 And another thing. Hossa is known as an extremely good defensive player, so it's logical that he would have a higher +/- than Kovalchuk (ignoring all the points above). The fact that he has a lower +/- doesn't automatically characterize Kovalchuk as bad defensively, or a floater. Most Atlanta fans recognize the fact that he has matured as a hockey player over the last several years and is fairly responsible in all facets of the game. You're touting a stereotype from 2004. kovalchuk isn't necessarily a floater but he needs to get better at backchecking. The good teams win because they can score and stop the other team. Just look at Zach, he is our top point getter and cares about keeping the puck out of our net just as much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MantaRay Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 They need a name like kovalchuk to keep fans coming to their games. Have you watched televised games from Atlanta??? He doesn't make a difference. Trade him, as he is lazy and one-dimensional, get some picks and actually build a winner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voros19 Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 Have you watched televised games from Atlanta??? He doesn't make a difference. Trade him, as he is lazy and one-dimensional, get some picks and actually build a winner. There's no way you actually believe what you post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice dog Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 Have you watched televised games from Atlanta??? He doesn't make a difference. Trade him, as he is lazy and one-dimensional, get some picks and actually build a winner. i agree! he does not back check worth a damn... atlanta needs to trade him and get more colby armstrong type players and then they will be on the right path to success! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voros19 Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 i agree! he does not back check worth a damn... atlanta needs to trade him and get more colby armstrong type players and then they will be on the right path to success! I can't tell if this is a joke. Atlanta needs to trade their 50 goal scorer and bring in more 30-40 point third line wingers? That's the path to success? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devlman Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 about 10 mill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pumpkin cutter Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 he needs to goto the khl and leave us alone. hes worth 6 /7 tops.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devilsfan118 Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 Certainly not more than 8. I can't imagine him wanting to stay in atlanta either; I get the impression he doesn't enjoy being the only real offensive threat on a team (and that's what he'll stay as in atlanta for at least the next few seasons). The only way he'll stay is if they offer him that 10m contract, which I can't imagine them not doing. I'd personally like to see him moved to a contender, and see atlanta get some legit young talent / high picks in return. Who knows, they could become the blackhawks of the east, if you will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerrydevil Posted December 26, 2009 Author Share Posted December 26, 2009 (edited) That proves absolutely nothing. Plus minus measures productivity, not defensive acumen. It has a ton of noise since +/- is affected by teammates, quality of competition, and goaltending (this variable should not matter much over a large enough sample, although a season's worth isn't big enough in my opinion). Kovalchuk and Hossa did not have identical linemates and opponents, so you're argument is useless. In addition Triumph already stated that Hossa's presence on the penalty kill would artificially inflate his +/- compared to Kovalchuk's. Finally, wingers do not have a tremendous effect on preventing goals from being scored. That responsibility lies with defensemen and centers, so don't immediately suspect that differences in +/- among two wingers will be because of their defensive ability. And another thing. Hossa is known as an extremely good defensive player, so it's logical that he would have a higher +/- than Kovalchuk (ignoring all the points above). The fact that he has a lower +/- doesn't automatically characterize Kovalchuk as bad defensively, or a floater. Most Atlanta fans recognize the fact that he has matured as a hockey player over the last several years and is fairly responsible in all facets of the game. You're touting a stereotype from 2004. Oh I see. You're his agent. So if he's not that bad defensively, where's his plus season? You'd think he'd have one by chance. Bad luck, I guess. Edited December 26, 2009 by Jerrydevil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.