RunninWithTheDevil Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Kind of off-topic, but relevant to the re-emergence of the Vuvuzela version New developments in the abuse case against the singer: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-31153633 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HellOnICE Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 YOU SUCK! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerzey Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Speaking of the You Suck crowd, can you imagine what it would have sounded like if they tried this at The Rock? http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/predators-fans-return-the-favour-sing-o-canada/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunninWithTheDevil Posted February 5, 2015 Author Share Posted February 5, 2015 (edited) Guess there won't be a... Rock and Roll Part 4 I hope this POS gets shanked in prison honestly. and thats awesome ^^^ i dont think I've ever been to a Devs game where the crowd has joined in singing Edited February 5, 2015 by RunninWithTheDevil 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William D'Aquila Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 He doesn't own the song anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'7' Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Glitter has been a known pedo for like 15 years already. Most of these years we had the song Anyway. It's gone and not coming back. True the post goal celebration sucks now, but eventually they will find a song people like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfitz804 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 I hate. Vuvuzela but I thought that was at least a cool use of one. Most of the time I want to see if I can shove it in one end of its player and make it come out the other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satans Hockey Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 (edited) He doesn't own the song anymore. If he lost the rights again they should just bring the song back. Edited February 6, 2015 by Satans Hockey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobilly45 Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 If he lost the rights again they should just bring the song back.they're never bringing it back... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sundstrom Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 I hate. Vuvuzela but I thought that was at least a cool use of one. i have to tell you, i'm not against the crowd made Vuvzela RR2. i appreciate it's that its fan led which gives it a bit of an "inside joke" type thing. and more importantly, they don't do it when the devils are losing (at least not at games i've been to this year). they will do it when devils are ahead or have tied the game - and that's when you do it. you do NOT do it when you're losing. that was always my problem with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDevs4978 Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 they're never bringing it back... What's the difference anymore? The fans more or less meld the chant in with whatever goal song the Devils do put out there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfitz804 Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Has someone actually gone on record that the song change was because of the chant? I remember a few previous times they changed it before that chant was happening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLL765 Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 He doesn't own the song anymore.I don't think that's true. I'm pretty sure there's no way to prevent someone from profiting from something unless it was created in the process of a committing a crime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chimaira_Devil_#9 Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Title of this thread should be Gary Glitter still guilty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfitz804 Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 I don't think that's true. I'm pretty sure there's no way to prevent someone from profiting from something unless it was created in the process of a committing a crime. Unless he sold the rights to it (maybe to pay legal fees), it's still his. You don't lose your intellectual property upon conviction of a crime, unless as ATL says, it would somehow be profiting from the crime. Just the fact that it was derived from the crime wouldn't necessarily be enough. The criminal has to be making an attempt to use his notoriety to profit. I.e. If he stabbed the guy who wrote the song to death and he stole it for his own. That would be subject to seizure because it's not his property, so that's not what we're talking about. If he wrote a song about how he loves child porn while in jail and tried to market it, then he would not be allowed to profit from it. In other words, RNR2 is not subject to seizure, UNLESS someone got a judgment against him and he had to sell assets to pay it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfitz804 Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Thinking about it, I am pretty sure he had a famous bankruptcy filing, so he probably did have to sell it. Still not just because of the crime, though it may have helped the bankruptcy along. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunninWithTheDevil Posted February 6, 2015 Author Share Posted February 6, 2015 (edited) Will infamous singer Gary Glitter's latest sex crimes conviction finally convince NHL teams to stop playing his music? http://m.thn.com/blog/will-infamous-singer-gary-glitters-latest-sex-crimes-conviction-finally-convince-nhl-teams-to-stop-playing-his-music/ This article makes a good point in correlation. How would one feel if an NHL team played Bill Cosby clips during intermission? Edited February 6, 2015 by RunninWithTheDevil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMazz Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Title of this thread should be Gary Glitter still guilty. No it should be called: "inevitable goal song thread part 67" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLL765 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Thinking about it, I am pretty sure he had a famous bankruptcy filing, so he probably did have to sell it. Still not just because of the crime, though it may have helped the bankruptcy along. I didn't realize he filed for bankruptcy. You're right that he may have had to sell the rights to the song while going through bankruptcy since that would be an asset that he could liquidate so to speak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roomtemp Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Didn't the Devils confirm he lost his rights and that's why it made a comeback when it did before being torn away from us last season? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Brown Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Gary Glitter is scum. Hope he rots in jail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.