Devil Dan 56 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 I'm not so mad in the pick itself, as I am in the sheer (non)necessity of it. We have the 29th pick - the only way we can get any lower is by winning the cup itself. I know we all think we're gonna win the cup every year, but in all honesty will likely have a higher draft position in the next two years. When Lou & Co decided to keep the pick this year, I thought it was because they had a very special or needed player in mind, or they were planning on trading up. In essence, I assumed there was a REAL reason to keep that pick. As much as I don't MIND this pick on a purely player level, I think it sucks on a strategic level. We could have easily given up this pick and been none the worse for it, especially taking into account what we may lose in the next 2 years. Also, is it possible Lou has something up his sleeve to get out of penalty? Sure, but I think it's extremely unlikely. Maybe Lou believes picking 29th in this draft is better than picking say 24th in the next draft. Maybe he doesn't see that kind of depth next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triumph Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 I'm not so mad in the pick itself, as I am in the sheer (non)necessity of it. We have the 29th pick - the only way we can get any lower is by winning the cup itself. I know we all think we're gonna win the cup every year, but in all honesty will likely have a higher draft position in the next two years. When Lou & Co decided to keep the pick this year, I thought it was because they had a very special or needed player in mind, or they were planning on trading up. In essence, I assumed there was a REAL reason to keep that pick. As much as I don't MIND this pick on a purely player level, I think it sucks on a strategic level. We could have easily given up this pick and been none the worse for it, especially taking into account what we may lose in the next 2 years. Also, is it possible Lou has something up his sleeve to get out of penalty? Sure, but I think it's extremely unlikely. The difference between, say, the 20th overall pick and the 29th overall pick is really not that large. The Devils need forwards in their system - Matteau immediately becomes their top forward prospect. Yeah, the Devils could've given this pick up, but they'd be kicking that forward problem down the road another year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDevs4978 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 When Lou & Co decided to keep the pick this year, I thought it was because they had a very special or needed player in mind, or they were planning on trading up. In essence, I assumed there was a REAL reason to keep that pick. One doesn't make any sense, there's absolutely no way of knowing who's going to be there at 29, I don't care if you're Lou, some guy from TSN or the mailman. It would have been a terrible reason to keep the pick to expect a particular player. Two maybe, but they have a pretty good record of trading up at the draft...if they saw nobody worth trading up for (or at least nobody clearly above what they were selecting in the 7-8 picks before us), they weren't going to trade up. Yes, the pick is likely to be lower in two years when we give it up (assuming we don't give it up next year when we don't have a 3rd rounder either), but would it really be so terrible if we're giving up a 18-20 pick two years later? The only thing that would make waiting terrible is if disaster struck and it was a top twelve or so pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog2020 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 You aren't going to get a sure fire 50 goal scorer at 29th. Lou and conte interviewed matteau at least twice. Clearly they see something in him, especially if they decided to use the pick. I don't know why people refuse to trust these guys. Apparently according to RDS, we turned down the 31st overall and another 2nd rounder for the 29 from Montreal because they also wanted to take Matteau. That's down 2 spots plus an extra 2. They like the kid. A lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDevs4978 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 (edited) Apparently according to RDS, we turned down the 31st overall and another 2nd rounder for the 29 from Montreal because they also wanted to take Matteau. That's down 2 spots plus an extra 2. They like the kid. A lot. Wow...well at least that ends the fear that we were 'stuck' with Matteau and wanted someone else. It was more than two spots though - Kings 30, Jackets 31. I think you meant four spots? Edited June 23, 2012 by NJDevs4978 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capo Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 I'm not so mad in the pick itself, as I am in the sheer (non)necessity of it. We have the 29th pick - the only way we can get any lower is by winning the cup itself. I know we all think we're gonna win the cup every year, but in all honesty will likely have a higher draft position in the next two years. When Lou & Co decided to keep the pick this year, I thought it was because they had a very special or needed player in mind, or they were planning on trading up. In essence, I assumed there was a REAL reason to keep that pick. As much as I don't MIND this pick on a purely player level, I think it sucks on a strategic level. We could have easily given up this pick and been none the worse for it, especially taking into account what we may lose in the next 2 years. Also, is it possible Lou has something up his sleeve to get out of penalty? Sure, but I think it's extremely unlikely. I'm with you on this. I'm thinking that he had a plan in place for a particular player and that player was off the board or they tried to trade up and the deal wasn't right. Otherwise, this pick just doesn't make sense. It would be nice if the kid surprised and we all ate some crow on this but I don't see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amberite Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Maybe Lou believes picking 29th in this draft is better than picking say 24th in the next draft. Maybe he doesn't see that kind of depth next year. There's no way to accurately predict next year's draft at this time, nevertheless two years from now. Also, by all accounts this was a pretty weak draft year. The difference between, say, the 20th overall pick and the 29th overall pick is really not that large. The Devils need forwards in their system - Matteau immediately becomes their top forward prospect. Yeah, the Devils could've given this pick up, but they'd be kicking that forward problem down the road another year. Actually 20th and 29th can be quite the difference. I can think of a lot of great players that were picked around 20th, and not so many in the 30th area. Also, what if something goes wrong next year and we end up with the 15th, 10th, or 5th? What if we get that happening two years from now and we're forced to give it up? I'm just saying there was no need to take this pick this year and risk this happening down the road. One doesn't make any sense, there's absolutely no way of knowing who's going to be there at 29, I don't care if you're Lou, some guy from TSN or the mailman. It would have been a terrible reason to keep the pick to expect a particular player. Two maybe, but they have a pretty good record of trading up at the draft...if they saw nobody worth trading up for (or at least nobody clearly above what they were selecting in the 7-8 picks before us), they weren't going to trade up. The scouting staff generally has a pretty good understanding of what will be available when. I would have expected them to keep this pick only if they thought that they would surely land with one of several players that would be great for the organization. Again, I have absolutely nothing against Matteau (unlike others here), and I think his scouting report is good, but I just don't see why we HAD to have to him this year. This is a player that you can get in any draft year is what I'm saying, I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog2020 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Wow...well at least that ends the fear that we were 'stuck' with Matteau and wanted someone else. It was more than two spots though - Kings 30, Jackets 31. I think you meant four spots? Duh, my bad yeah- #34, not 31. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 You aren't going to get a sure fire 50 goal scorer at 29th. Lou and conte interviewed matteau at least twice. Clearly they see something in him, especially if they decided to use the pick. I don't know why people refuse to trust these guys. ok now, enough with the "youre not worthy of being a fan of this team if you dont trust Lou" attitude here. I'm not just gonna get on my knees kissing his ass pretending the guy is perfect and that every single decisions he made was a good decision. Of course i trust him and he made some GREAT things through the years but he also made some pretty bad decisions too and im not gonna close my eyes on that pretending it never happened or that he cant make any more bad decisions. since the Nierdermayer first round pick pick... Jason Smith "92, Denis Pederson '93, Vadim Sharifijanov '94, Lance Ward '96, Jean-Francois Damphousse '97, Mike Van Ryn '98, Ari Ahonen '99, David Hale '00, Adrian Foster '01, Nicklas Bergfors '05, Matt Corrente '06, Mattias Tedenby '08..... What happened to ALL those first rounders ? actually it would have been easier to name the good first round pick since nierdermayer... Sykora, Parise, Zajac, Josefson... and god knows if Merrill will be a good pick and Larsson was a no brainer... Again im not saying Lou is not doing a great job or that i'd do a better job... but people need to start giving sh!t to fans for doubting him once in awhile... Lou and Conte FAILED pretty damn often in the first round Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triumph Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 (edited) Actually 20th and 29th can be quite the difference. I can think of a lot of great players that were picked around 20th, and not so many in the 30th area. Also, what if something goes wrong next year and we end up with the 15th, 10th, or 5th? What if we get that happening two years from now and we're forced to give it up? I'm just saying there was no need to take this pick this year and risk this happening down the road. There have been lots of excellent NHL players taken at both spots, and the percentage of average players doesn't change significantly. I agree, it's a risk, but again, you've got a big organizational hole at winger that the Devils have hopefully closed up a bit. EDIT: Jason Smith and Mike Van Ryn were both very good NHL players, why are they being put on the bust list Edited June 23, 2012 by Triumph Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDevs4978 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 (edited) Duh, my bad yeah- #34, not 31. So I guess the rumored deal was the Habs' 33 and 51 (their two second-rounders) for our 29? Edited June 23, 2012 by NJDevs4978 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghdi Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Again im not saying Lou is not doing a great job or that i'd do a better job... but people need to start giving sh!t to fans for doubting him once in awhile... Lou and Conte FAILED pretty damn often in the first round No one can argue against that. They have made some crap picks in the past. But, they decided to keep the pick and it very well may turn out to be a bad decision, but the book is still being written. We don't know how next year will go. We don't know how the season following will go in respect to giving up a first. We kept the pick and took a guy the team seem confident about. Its clear the kid was targeted and "vetted" and wasnt a seat of the pants pick. Thats enough for me right now. If it turns out to be a sh!t pick, so be it. There's nothing we can do about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDevs4978 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Again im not saying Lou is not doing a great job or that i'd do a better job... but people need to start giving sh!t to fans for doubting him once in awhile... Lou and Conte FAILED pretty damn often in the first round You're pretty much guaranteed to fail more than you succeed in the draft. I'm sure someone could do a great study if they went back and analyzed a particular draft from 5-10 years ago, and see how many of those guys really became useful NHL players (more than 100-200 games). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 anyway i'll be able to watch him play whenever he's playing in Bathurst, Moncton or St-John so we'll see. But i stand by my opinion that in this particular situation we should have forfeit this year pick. Its a big risk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revan Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 You think after 3 Stanley cup championships, 5 finals appearances, a playoff series sweep and a win in impressive fashion this year, in a time the Rangers have won precisely fu©k all we would be over this , but i guess not. This +100. I know it's easier for me to say when I don't have to face Rangers fans everyday, but seriously, we have MAJOR bragging rights over them. Imagine the sh!t we would be getting from them if it was them winning three Cups since our last one. We have so much on them it's just unbelievable anyone is still getting upset when they bring up their 18-year old champnioship. The irony and controversy is obvious, I understand people who are puzzled and have mixed feeling about the situation. But some of you folks saying we should bury him in the minors and wishing bad luck on him just because of his roots... I hope you're kidding and it's just a fresh emotional reaction to the pick. ONLY good things can result from him playing well. Not only does it help the team win, it is also a slack in the face of Rangers fans. He is a Devil now, so I support him 100%. I hope he doesn't turn out to be a bust. Still, there's going to be some awkward moments when his dad is at the game in NJ. Seeing the elder Matteau, a Rangers hero, in a Devils hat... priceless! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devils26 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 If anyone here still suffers from ass fury over 94, after winning three cups and knocking that team out the way we did this year, kill yourselves. I can't judge the kid because I've never seen him play but how great would it be if he makes it? I think it would be awesome to see this kid thrive while Ranger fans watch us chant his name. I'd love to have a Matteau Devils jersey, just to further shove it up their ass. In all honesty, are you 12 years old or just an enormous idiot? Telling people to kill themselves if they have trouble getting over one of the most crushing defeats in the franchise's history? People like you need to just stop posting because you bring nothing but immaturity. I really wanted to let your stupid post go and not respond, but I couldn't bring myself to do it. I don't care if you were kidding, which you probably were, but telling people to kill themselves really exposes you as a true idiot and baby. Please grow up a little bit before you post again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onddeck Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Haha that sentence was like something you'd find on a third grader's homework assignment designed to work on your proofreading skills. Or an iphone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devils26 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 This +100. I know it's easier for me to say when I don't have to face Rangers fans everyday, but seriously, we have MAJOR bragging rights over them. Imagine the sh!t we would be getting from them if it was them winning three Cups since our last one. We have so much on them it's just unbelievable anyone is still getting upset when they bring up their 18-year old champnioship. The irony and controversy is obvious, I understand people who are puzzled and have mixed feeling about the situation. But some of you folks saying we should bury him in the minors and wishing bad luck on him just because of his roots... I hope you're kidding and it's just a fresh emotional reaction to the pick. ONLY good things can result from him playing well. Not only does it help the team win, it is also a slack in the face of Rangers fans. He is a Devil now, so I support him 100%. I hope he doesn't turn out to be a bust. Still, there's going to be some awkward moments when his dad is at the game in NJ. Seeing the elder Matteau, a Rangers hero, in a Devils hat... priceless! Everybody who talks about the Rags rivalry from out of town always qualifies their statement with this, but seeing and interacting with Rangers fans every day is one of the main things that fuels the rivalry. You can't just take out one of the main parts of the rivalry and then assume that you understand it as well as those who have to live amongst Rags fans. I love all of our out of town posters, but without actually living in the NY/NJ area, it's tough to completely understand why Devils fans hate the Rags so much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Everybody who talks about the Rags rivalry from out of town always qualifies their statement with this, but seeing and interacting with Rangers fans every day is one of the main things that fuels the rivalry. You can't just take out one of the main parts of the rivalry and then assume that you understand it as well as those who have to live amongst Rags fans. I love all of our out of town posters, but without actually living in the NY/NJ area, it's tough to completely understand why Devils fans hate the Rags so much. agreed, here im surrounded by Habs fans and thats where the rivalry is with me. I know 2-3 rangers fans so. Happily NJ still had something with the Brodeur thing against Mtl and they owned them for yeaaarrrsss so i was in a good spot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevsMan84 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 After beating the tags like we did this year, their fans have no ground to talk sh!t. However that won't prevent them from doing so. In other words, nothing has changed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Dan 56 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 ok now, enough with the "youre not worthy of being a fan of this team if you dont trust Lou" attitude here. I'm not just gonna get on my knees kissing his ass pretending the guy is perfect and that every single decisions he made was a good decision. Of course i trust him and he made some GREAT things through the years but he also made some pretty bad decisions too and im not gonna close my eyes on that pretending it never happened or that he cant make any more bad decisions. since the Nierdermayer first round pick pick... Jason Smith "92, Denis Pederson '93, Vadim Sharifijanov '94, Lance Ward '96, Jean-Francois Damphousse '97, Mike Van Ryn '98, Ari Ahonen '99, David Hale '00, Adrian Foster '01, Nicklas Bergfors '05, Matt Corrente '06, Mattias Tedenby '08..... What happened to ALL those first rounders ? actually it would have been easier to name the good first round pick since nierdermayer... Sykora, Parise, Zajac, Josefson... and god knows if Merrill will be a good pick and Larsson was a no brainer... Again im not saying Lou is not doing a great job or that i'd do a better job... but people need to start giving sh!t to fans for doubting him once in awhile... Lou and Conte FAILED pretty damn often in the first round No one questioned your fandom. I said that between then interviewing him numerous times and turning down montreal's offer, they had to have seen something they liked. The devils have drafted pretty well the last couple of years. I really don't think they would have kept the pick if they didn't feel it was worth it. Let's atleast see the kid at prospect camp first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayday Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 This is going to be a hard prospect to project. He is only 18 and will enter the Q next year. He has some temper and discipline issues but that can be fixed. If anything his temper is good because we lack forwards with a real edge. The last thing we need him to do though is pull a Cormier. If he is developed correctly he could be at best a second line winger. A safe projection would be third line winger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDevils1214 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 (edited) I'm not so mad in the pick itself, as I am in the sheer (non)necessity of it. We have the 29th pick - the only way we can get any lower is by winning the cup itself. I know we all think we're gonna win the cup every year, but in all honesty will likely have a higher draft position in the next two years. When Lou & Co decided to keep the pick this year, I thought it was because they had a very special or needed player in mind, or they were planning on trading up. In essence, I assumed there was a REAL reason to keep that pick. This.^ I honestly thought that Lou and company was going to trade up when Forsberg was getting passed on or even Teravainen. I guess it isn't disappointment in the pick rather the lack of a move I was so convinced was going to happen. I am kind of worried this kid might just be Mike Rupp 2.0 or something. Edited June 23, 2012 by NJDevils1214 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 since the Nierdermayer first round pick pick... Jason Smith "92, Denis Pederson '93, Vadim Sharifijanov '94, Lance Ward '96, Jean-Francois Damphousse '97, Mike Van Ryn '98, Ari Ahonen '99, David Hale '00, Adrian Foster '01, Nicklas Bergfors '05, Matt Corrente '06, Mattias Tedenby '08..... What happened to ALL those first rounders ? actually it would have been easier to name the good first round pick since nierdermayer... Sykora, Parise, Zajac, Josefson... and god knows if Merrill will be a good pick and Larsson was a no brainer... The Red Wings have had about the same amount of success with their first picks since '94. The Devils "busts", so to speak, are a product of them drafting at the bottom of the first round virtually every year. Lance Ward was the number 10 pick in perhaps the worst draft in NHL history. What you really should be asking is who the Devils passed over to select those busts (not drafting Pavel Datsyuk doesn't count)? Very, very few who turned out to be good. Want to talk about a bad drafting team. Take a look at the Ranger first rounders from 1992 to 2004. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peteyvegas Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Relax, you loonies!! We'll trade him to the Rags for their best player. They're crazy like that. The fans will be tormenting the management for that trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.