mfitz804 Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 6 minutes ago, MB3 said: I have a Blake Coleman jersey and I adore the man but if you aren’t doing a happy dance in your kitchen right now at that return you’re a moron. spectacular fvcking trade my god. I was already looking back at the 2017-18 roster to see if there was an easy replacement if I stripped mine, since it has the NHL100 sleeve patch. The answer was, nobody whose number covers a 20 well, so I’ll stick with Blake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog2020 Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Nicomo said: Yeah, Fitz doing a good job so far. And both guys traded were from Lou lol If Fitz wants this job full-time, he’s off to a nice start. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonginator11 Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 3 minutes ago, MB3 said: Hate to say it but if that’s the kind of price a team will pay for Blake Coleman, you have to see what they’ll pay for Kyle Palmieri. I’m afraid of what the Rangers will get for Kreider 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 (edited) Sad to see Blake go...but that’s a big return. Pretty sure Fitz is going to get the interim tag removed in time. A strong hunch. Edited February 17, 2020 by Colorado Rockies 1976 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWagg72 Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 1 minute ago, MB3 said: Hate to say it but if that’s the kind of price a team will pay for Blake Coleman, you have to see what they’ll pay for Kyle Palmieri. 100% agree. If Fitz is going to get returns like this, they need to move Simmonds and Vat and see what kind of return you can get for Palms. You’d have to get a great return for him though now that Coleman is gone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicomo Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 (edited) 3 minutes ago, mfitz804 said: I was already looking back at the 2017-18 roster to see if there was an easy replacement if I stripped mine, since it has the NHL100 sleeve patch. The answer was, nobody whose number covers a 20 well, so I’ll stick with Blake. Why just that year? Wouldn’t any Edge be ok? I mean, I have OCD, but I wouldn’t really worry about the 1’s vs the 2.0’s or a particular year lol disregard I read your post too fast and didn’t see the mention of the patch lol Edited February 17, 2020 by Nicomo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerzey Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, MB3 said: Sort of annoying — if the Canucks miss the playoffs this year, the pick slides to 2021. So we have to hope for a last second slip in to the playoffs and a quick first round exit. They seem pretty locked into a playoff spot at this point but anything can happen. Arizona has their work cut out for them though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lateralous Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 Great trade that you had to do given the return. A little easier to swallow when the rookies backfilling the lineup are scoring tonight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob_Ottawa Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 horrible trade. The draft pick will be very late and likely useless. He wasn't UFA, no need to do this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicomo Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 Just now, MB3 said: He mentioned it has that 100 patch. That’s a bad look with anyone who wasn’t around that season. Zajac seems like a great option here. Yeah, I edited my post. Reading comprehension fail on my part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJDevils1214 Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 Just now, Rob_Ottawa said: horrible trade. The draft pick will be very late and likely useless. He wasn't UFA, no need to do this. That extra year is what helped get NJ the level of return they did. It is clear I am never going to agree with you on anything. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicomo Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Rob_Ottawa said: horrible trade. The draft pick will be very late and likely useless. He wasn't UFA, no need to do this. LOL Horrible? Give me a break. A 1st and a good prospect is a GREAT return for slightly over one season of a 28 year old who’s career high in points is 36. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerzey Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Rob_Ottawa said: horrible trade. The draft pick will be very late and likely useless. He wasn't UFA, no need to do this. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicomo Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, NJDevils1214 said: That extra year is what helped get NJ the level of return they did. It is clear I am never going to agree with you on anything. Join the club lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfitz804 Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 1 minute ago, MB3 said: He mentioned it has that 100 patch. That’s a bad look with anyone who wasn’t around that season. Zajac seems like a great option here. Plus that season is Adidas, not Reebok Edge. I want to make sure the glue remnants, if any, are mostly covered. A “1” is bad for covering another number, which is why I’m not making it a Hischier. I suppose I could strip it first and see what I’m dealing with...or remove the sleeve patch, but I don’t like to take stuff off when there’s nothing going back to cover it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lateralous Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 Given the Lightning’s drafting record over the last decade or so, I like getting a 2019 1st rounder that THEY made the call on 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIP72 Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 Real disappointed Coleman was traded even with the good return, but the Devils weren’t going anywhere this season and it would probably would be an uphill climb next season to make the playoffs even with Coleman.The Devils just need more of their young guys to live up to or preferably exceed their pedigrees.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicomo Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 3 minutes ago, mfitz804 said: Plus that season is Adidas, not Reebok Edge. I want to make sure the glue remnants, if any, are mostly covered. A “1” is bad for covering another number, which is why I’m not making it a Hischier. I suppose I could strip it first and see what I’m dealing with...or remove the sleeve patch, but I don’t like to take stuff off when there’s nothing going back to cover it. I still have a game issued Ramage #55 that I’ve been meaning to send in to make into a Hughes. Which I would think will cover nicely. Still not sure what to do with my Edge Hall though. Think I asked you guys before, but it seems White #5 is probably my best bet if I want it redone. 4 minutes ago, Lateralous said: Given the Lightning’s drafting record over the last decade or so, I like getting a 2019 1st rounder that THEY made the call on Good point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfitz804 Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Nicomo said: I still have a game issued Ramage #55 that I’ve been meaning to send in to make into a Hughes. Which I would think will cover nicely. Still not sure what to do with my Edge Hall though. Think I asked you guys before, but it seems White #5 is probably my best bet if I want it redone. Good point. White is a good choice on that one. The 55-86 swap would work well also. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SterioDesign Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 (edited) Well since we're collecting canadian gold medalists... might as well get Byram too Edited February 17, 2020 by SterioDesign Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonginator11 Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 17 minutes ago, MB3 said: He’s a UFA after the season — that return will be less than Hall. I forgot that he was a UFA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devs3cups Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 (edited) Foote played well in the world juniors for Canada. He has a great shot. Loved Blake. But this is a GREAT return. Edited February 17, 2020 by Devs3cups 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagknife Posted February 17, 2020 Author Share Posted February 17, 2020 31 minutes ago, Nicomo said: Oh noooooo, is that Adam’s son?? His dad is one of my most hated players ever lol good return though. Yeah, highly regarded power forward 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Rockies 1976 Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 Some guy behind me bitching incessantly about this deal. As in won’t shut the fvck up about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunninWithTheDevil Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 Sad to see one of the few bright spots of these past few years hitting the road but you gotta love that return. Shero who? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.